• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本子宫内膜癌患者微创外科手术的趋势和特征。

Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 May;34(3):e56. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e56. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e56
PMID:36929580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10157347/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Owing to the potential benefits of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer, the practice pattern has recently shifted in Japan. This study examined the trends in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study examined the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tumor Registry database between 2015-2019. This study examined the time-specific proportion change and predictors of MIS use in initial endometrial cancer treatment in Japan, and compared it with the use of abdominal surgery. Additionally, the association between hospital surgical treatment volume and MIS use was examined.

RESULTS

A total of 14,059 patients (26.5%) underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy, and 39,070 patients (73.5%) underwent abdominal hysterectomy in the study period. Patients who underwent MIS were more likely to be treated at high-volume centers, younger, central, or western Japan residents, registered in recent years, and had a tumor with stage I disease, type 1 histology, and less myometrial invasion (all adjusted p<0.05). The proportion of MIS treatments increased from 19.1% in 2015 to 34.3% in 2019 (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, treatment at high-volume centers was a contributing factor for MIS (adjusted odds ratio=3.85; 95% confidence interval=3.44-4.30). MIS at high-volume centers increased significantly from 24.8% to 41.0% (p<0.001) during the study period, whereas MIS at low-volume centers remained at median 8.8%.

CONCLUSION

MIS has increased significantly in recent years, accounting for nearly 34% of surgical management of endometrial cancer in Japan. High-volume treatment centers take the lead in performing MIS.

摘要

目的

由于微创子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌具有潜在益处,因此日本最近改变了手术方式。本研究旨在探讨日本子宫内膜癌患者微创治疗的趋势。

方法

本回顾性观察性研究分析了日本妇产科协会肿瘤登记数据库 2015 年至 2019 年的数据。本研究考察了日本子宫内膜癌初始治疗中微创手术(MIS)的时间特异性比例变化及其预测因素,并与腹部手术进行了比较。此外,还分析了医院手术治疗量与 MIS 使用之间的关联。

结果

在研究期间,共有 14059 例(26.5%)患者接受了微创子宫切除术,39070 例(73.5%)患者接受了剖腹子宫切除术。接受 MIS 治疗的患者更可能在高容量中心接受治疗,年龄较小,来自中心或西部日本,登记时间较晚,且肿瘤处于 I 期、组织学类型为 1 型、肌层浸润程度较低(所有调整后的 p 值均<0.05)。2015 年 MIS 治疗比例为 19.1%,2019 年增至 34.3%(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,高容量中心治疗是 MIS 的一个促成因素(调整后比值比=3.85;95%置信区间=3.44-4.30)。在此期间,高容量中心的 MIS 比例从 2015 年的 24.8%显著增加至 41.0%(p<0.001),而低容量中心的 MIS 比例保持在中位数 8.8%。

结论

近年来,MIS 显著增加,占日本子宫内膜癌手术治疗的近 34%。高容量治疗中心率先开展 MIS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/850fd86d34e7/jgo-34-e56-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/a2e6709fe55e/jgo-34-e56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/f4313ac616b3/jgo-34-e56-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/d5ae5d8de207/jgo-34-e56-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/850fd86d34e7/jgo-34-e56-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/a2e6709fe55e/jgo-34-e56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/f4313ac616b3/jgo-34-e56-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/d5ae5d8de207/jgo-34-e56-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb1/10157347/850fd86d34e7/jgo-34-e56-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.日本子宫内膜癌患者微创外科手术的趋势和特征。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 May;34(3):e56. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e56. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
Questionnaire survey regarding current status of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer in Japan: A cross-sectional survey for JSGOE members.针对日本子宫内膜癌微创手术现状的问卷调查:日本妇科肿瘤学会成员的横断面调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023 Sep;49(9):2370-2378. doi: 10.1111/jog.15728. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.作为子宫内膜癌的质量指标的微创手术率。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1389-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.在国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)中心进行的子宫内膜癌的微创子宫切除术手术率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):480-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Care: A Quality and Cost Disparity.微创外科在子宫内膜癌治疗中的应用:质量和成本的差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):91-100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001180.
6
Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?II型子宫内膜癌的微创治疗方法:明智且安全吗?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Disparities in Surgical Care Among Women With Endometrial Cancer.子宫内膜癌女性患者手术治疗的差异
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):526-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001567.
8
Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.子宫操作器对子宫内膜癌手术中肿瘤学结果的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):65.e1-65.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的区域趋势及围手术期结局探索
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;77:102095. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102095. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
10
Variability between individual surgeons in route of hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer in Florida.佛罗里达州子宫内膜癌患者行子宫切除术的术者间手术途径差异。
Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;31:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer in Japan.日本子宫内膜癌的医院治疗量与生存结局的成本效益分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;35(5):e61. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e61. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between hospital treatment volume and survival of women with gynecologic malignancy in Japan: a JSOG tumor registry-based data extraction study.日本妇科恶性肿瘤患者的医院治疗量与生存率的关系:基于 JSOG 肿瘤登记处的数据提取研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e3. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e3. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Binary genetic algorithm for optimal joinpoint detection: Application to cancer trend analysis.用于最优折点检测的二元遗传算法:在癌症趋势分析中的应用
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 10;40(3):799-822. doi: 10.1002/sim.8803. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
Nationwide Comparison of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
全国范围内机器人手术、腹腔镜手术和开放手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的手术和肿瘤学结局比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):549-557. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.802. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
4
Surgical trends, outcomes and disparities in minimal invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in England: a retrospective cohort study.英国子宫内膜癌患者微创手术的手术趋势、结果和差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 16;10(9):e036222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036222.
5
Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.勘误:《2018年全球癌症统计数据:全球癌症观察站对185个国家36种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313. doi: 10.3322/caac.21609. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasms.日本妇科肿瘤学会 2018 年子宫体肿瘤治疗指南。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):e18. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e18. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Implementing robotic surgery for uterine cancer in the United States: Better outcomes without increased costs.美国实施机器人手术治疗子宫癌:更好的疗效,无增加成本。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Feb;156(2):451-458. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
Trends and characteristics of epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan between 2002 and 2015: A JSGO-JSOG joint study.2002 年至 2015 年日本上皮性卵巢癌的趋势和特征:JSGO-JSOG 联合研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jun;153(3):589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.243. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 31;10(10):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.
10
A nationwide survey on gynecologic endoscopic surgery in Japan, 2014-2016.2014 - 2016年日本妇科内镜手术全国性调查
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Nov;44(11):2067-2076. doi: 10.1111/jog.13774. Epub 2018 Aug 20.