Suppr超能文献

养育测量、规范性及其与儿童结果的关联:比较来自四个非西方文化的证据。

Parenting measurement, normativeness, and associations with child outcomes: Comparing evidence from four non-Western cultures.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA.

School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13388. doi: 10.1111/desc.13388. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

This study compared parenting across four non-Western cultures to test cross-cultural commonality and specificity principles in three aspects: measurement properties, parenting normativeness, and their associations with child outcomes. Both mothers and fathers (N = 1509 dyads) with preschool-aged children (M = 5.00 years; 48% girls) from urban areas of four countries (Malaysia, N = 372; China, N = 441; Turkey, N = 402; and Japan, N = 294) reported on four parenting constructs (authoritative, authoritarian, group harmony socialization, and intrusive control) and their sub-dimensions using modified culturally relevant measures. Teachers reported on children's internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors. The commonality principle was supported by two sets of findings: (1) full measurement invariance was established for most parenting constructs and sub-dimensions, except that intrusive control only reached partial scalar invariance, and (2) no variations were found in associations between parenting and any child outcomes across cultures or parent gender at the construct level for all four parenting constructs and at the sub-dimensional level for authoritarian and intrusive control sub-dimensions. The specificity principle was supported by the other two sets of findings: (1) cross-cultural differences in parenting normativeness did not follow the pattern of economic development but yielded culture-specific patterns, and (2) at the sub-dimensional level, the authoritative parenting and group harmony socialization sub-dimensions were differently associated with child outcomes across cultures and/or parent gender. The findings suggested that examining specific dimensions rather than broad parenting constructs is necessary to reflect cultural specificities and nuances. Our study provided a culturally-invariant instrument and a three-step guide for future parenting research to examine cross-cultural commonalities/specificities. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: This is the first study to use an instrument with measurement invariance across multiple non-Western cultures to examine the commonality and specificity principles in parenting. Measurement invariance was achieved across cultures for authoritative and authoritarian parenting, group harmony socialization, intrusive control, and their sub-dimensions, supporting the commonality principle. Cross-cultural differences in parenting normativeness did not follow the pattern of economic development but yielded culture-specific patterns, supporting the specificity principle. Both commonalities and specificities were manifested in associations between parenting and child outcomes across cultures.

摘要

本研究比较了四个非西方文化中的育儿方式,以检验跨文化共同性和特异性原则在三个方面的表现:测量特性、育儿规范性及其与儿童结果的关系。来自四个国家(马来西亚、中国、土耳其和日本)城市地区的 1509 对有学龄前儿童的母亲和父亲(N=372;N=441;N=402;N=294)报告了四种育儿结构(权威型、专制型、集体和谐社会化和侵入性控制)及其使用改良的具有文化相关性的测量方法的子维度。教师报告了儿童的内化、外化和亲社会行为。共同性原则得到了两组发现的支持:(1)除了侵入性控制仅达到部分标度不变外,大多数育儿结构和子维度都建立了完全测量不变性,(2)在文化间或父母性别层面,在所有四种育儿结构和专制型和侵入性控制子维度的子维度层面上,都没有发现育儿与任何儿童结果之间的关联存在变化。特异性原则得到了另外两组发现的支持:(1)育儿规范性的跨文化差异并不遵循经济发展模式,而是产生了具有文化特异性的模式,(2)在子维度层面上,权威型和集体和谐社会化子维度与文化间和/或父母性别相关的儿童结果不同。研究结果表明,为了反映文化的特殊性和细微差别,有必要检查具体的维度而不是广泛的育儿结构。本研究提供了一种具有跨文化不变性的工具和一个三步指导方针,用于未来的育儿研究,以检验跨文化的共同性/特异性。研究亮点:这是第一项使用具有跨多个非西方文化不变性的工具来检验育儿共同性和特异性原则的研究。跨文化的权威性和专制性育儿、集体和谐社会化、侵入性控制及其子维度均实现了测量不变性,支持了共同性原则。育儿规范性的跨文化差异并不遵循经济发展模式,而是产生了具有文化特异性的模式,支持了特异性原则。共同性和特异性都表现在文化间育儿与儿童结果之间的关系中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验