• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养育测量、规范性及其与儿童结果的关联:比较来自四个非西方文化的证据。

Parenting measurement, normativeness, and associations with child outcomes: Comparing evidence from four non-Western cultures.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA.

School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13388. doi: 10.1111/desc.13388. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1111/desc.13388
PMID:36929667
Abstract

This study compared parenting across four non-Western cultures to test cross-cultural commonality and specificity principles in three aspects: measurement properties, parenting normativeness, and their associations with child outcomes. Both mothers and fathers (N = 1509 dyads) with preschool-aged children (M = 5.00 years; 48% girls) from urban areas of four countries (Malaysia, N = 372; China, N = 441; Turkey, N = 402; and Japan, N = 294) reported on four parenting constructs (authoritative, authoritarian, group harmony socialization, and intrusive control) and their sub-dimensions using modified culturally relevant measures. Teachers reported on children's internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors. The commonality principle was supported by two sets of findings: (1) full measurement invariance was established for most parenting constructs and sub-dimensions, except that intrusive control only reached partial scalar invariance, and (2) no variations were found in associations between parenting and any child outcomes across cultures or parent gender at the construct level for all four parenting constructs and at the sub-dimensional level for authoritarian and intrusive control sub-dimensions. The specificity principle was supported by the other two sets of findings: (1) cross-cultural differences in parenting normativeness did not follow the pattern of economic development but yielded culture-specific patterns, and (2) at the sub-dimensional level, the authoritative parenting and group harmony socialization sub-dimensions were differently associated with child outcomes across cultures and/or parent gender. The findings suggested that examining specific dimensions rather than broad parenting constructs is necessary to reflect cultural specificities and nuances. Our study provided a culturally-invariant instrument and a three-step guide for future parenting research to examine cross-cultural commonalities/specificities. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: This is the first study to use an instrument with measurement invariance across multiple non-Western cultures to examine the commonality and specificity principles in parenting. Measurement invariance was achieved across cultures for authoritative and authoritarian parenting, group harmony socialization, intrusive control, and their sub-dimensions, supporting the commonality principle. Cross-cultural differences in parenting normativeness did not follow the pattern of economic development but yielded culture-specific patterns, supporting the specificity principle. Both commonalities and specificities were manifested in associations between parenting and child outcomes across cultures.

摘要

本研究比较了四个非西方文化中的育儿方式,以检验跨文化共同性和特异性原则在三个方面的表现:测量特性、育儿规范性及其与儿童结果的关系。来自四个国家(马来西亚、中国、土耳其和日本)城市地区的 1509 对有学龄前儿童的母亲和父亲(N=372;N=441;N=402;N=294)报告了四种育儿结构(权威型、专制型、集体和谐社会化和侵入性控制)及其使用改良的具有文化相关性的测量方法的子维度。教师报告了儿童的内化、外化和亲社会行为。共同性原则得到了两组发现的支持:(1)除了侵入性控制仅达到部分标度不变外,大多数育儿结构和子维度都建立了完全测量不变性,(2)在文化间或父母性别层面,在所有四种育儿结构和专制型和侵入性控制子维度的子维度层面上,都没有发现育儿与任何儿童结果之间的关联存在变化。特异性原则得到了另外两组发现的支持:(1)育儿规范性的跨文化差异并不遵循经济发展模式,而是产生了具有文化特异性的模式,(2)在子维度层面上,权威型和集体和谐社会化子维度与文化间和/或父母性别相关的儿童结果不同。研究结果表明,为了反映文化的特殊性和细微差别,有必要检查具体的维度而不是广泛的育儿结构。本研究提供了一种具有跨文化不变性的工具和一个三步指导方针,用于未来的育儿研究,以检验跨文化的共同性/特异性。研究亮点:这是第一项使用具有跨多个非西方文化不变性的工具来检验育儿共同性和特异性原则的研究。跨文化的权威性和专制性育儿、集体和谐社会化、侵入性控制及其子维度均实现了测量不变性,支持了共同性原则。育儿规范性的跨文化差异并不遵循经济发展模式,而是产生了具有文化特异性的模式,支持了特异性原则。共同性和特异性都表现在文化间育儿与儿童结果之间的关系中。

相似文献

1
Parenting measurement, normativeness, and associations with child outcomes: Comparing evidence from four non-Western cultures.养育测量、规范性及其与儿童结果的关联:比较来自四个非西方文化的证据。
Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13388. doi: 10.1111/desc.13388. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Cross-Cultural Associations of Four Parenting Behaviors With Child Flourishing: Examining Cultural Specificity and Commonality in Cultural Normativeness and Intergenerational Transmission Processes.四种养育行为与儿童茁壮成长的跨文化关联:审视文化规范性和代际传承过程中的文化特异性与共性
Child Dev. 2021 Nov;92(6):e1138-e1153. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13634. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Longitudinal associations between parenting and youth adjustment in twelve cultural groups: Cultural normativeness of parenting as a moderator.12 个文化群体中教养方式与青少年适应的纵向关联:教养方式的文化规范性作为调节变量。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Feb;54(2):362-377. doi: 10.1037/dev0000416. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Examining effects of parent warmth and control on internalizing behavior clusters from age 8 to 12 in 12 cultural groups in nine countries.考察 12 个国家的 9 个文化群体中,从 8 岁到 12 岁期间父母温暖与控制对内化行为群的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;61(4):436-446. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13138. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
Parenting practices and their relevance to child behaviors in Canada and China.中加父母教养方式及其与儿童行为的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;51(2):109-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00795.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
6
Ready to make nice: parental socialization of young sons' and daughters' prosocial behaviors with peers.准备好表现友善:父母对年幼子女与同伴亲社会行为的社会化培养。
J Genet Psychol. 2007 Jun;168(2):177-200. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.168.2.177-200.
7
Maternal socialization goals, parenting styles, and social-emotional adjustment among Chinese and European American young adults: testing a mediation model.中国和欧美裔年轻人的母亲社会化目标、育儿方式与社会情感调适:检验一个中介模型
J Genet Psychol. 2010 Oct-Dec;171(4):330-62. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2010.505969.
8
Parent discipline practices in an international sample: associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness.国际样本中的父母纪律实践:与儿童行为的关联及感知规范性的调节作用。
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):487-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x.
9
Parent socialization effects in different cultures: significance of directive parenting.不同文化中的父母社会化影响:指令性养育方式的重要性
Psychol Rep. 2012 Jun;110(3):854-78. doi: 10.2466/10.02.17.21.PR0.110.3.854-878.
10
Test of a cultural framework of parenting with Latino families of young children.对有年幼子女的拉丁美国家庭的育儿文化框架的测试。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2012 Jul;18(3):285-96. doi: 10.1037/a0028694. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Parenting Style and Child Internet Addiction in China: Mediation Effect of Parental Active Meditation.中国的育儿方式与儿童网络成瘾:父母积极冥想的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;22(4):461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040461.
2
Childhood psychological maltreatment subtypes and depression among Chinese college students: the role of self-compassion and perceived negative attention bias.中国大学生童年期心理虐待亚型与抑郁:自我同情和感知消极注意偏向的作用
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;13(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02617-z.
3
Influential Factors Behind the Declining Helicopter Parenting in Chinese Emerging Adults' First-Year University Life.
中国新兴成年人大学一年级生活中直升机式育儿方式减少背后的影响因素。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02171-2.