Sorkhabi Nadia
Department of Child & Adolescent Development, Lurie College of Education, San Jose State University, CA 95192-0075, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Jun;110(3):854-78. doi: 10.2466/10.02.17.21.PR0.110.3.854-878.
In this article, the controversy of divergent findings in research on parental socialization effects in different cultures is addressed. Three explanations intended to address divergent findings of socialization effects in different cultures, as advanced by researchers who emphasize cultural differences, are discussed. These include cultural differences in socialization values and goals of parents, parental emotional and cognitive characteristics associated with parenting styles, and adolescents' interpretations or evaluations of their parents' parenting styles. The empirical evidence for and against each of these arguments is examined and an alternative paradigm for understanding and empirical study of developmental outcomes associated with parenting styles in different cultures is suggested. Baumrind's directive parenting style is presented as an alternative to the authoritarian parenting style in understanding the positive developmental effects associated with "strict" parenting in cultures said to have a collectivist orientation. Directions for research on the three explanations are mentioned.
本文探讨了不同文化中父母社会化影响研究结果存在差异的争议。文中讨论了三位强调文化差异的研究者所提出的、旨在解释不同文化中社会化影响差异的三种观点。这些观点包括父母社会化价值观和目标的文化差异、与养育方式相关的父母情感和认知特征,以及青少年对父母养育方式的理解或评价。本文审视了支持和反对上述每种观点的实证证据,并提出了一种用于理解和实证研究不同文化中与养育方式相关的发展结果的替代范式。在理解与所谓集体主义文化中“严格”养育相关的积极发展影响时,提出用鲍姆林德的指导型养育方式替代专制型养育方式。文中还提及了针对这三种解释的研究方向。