Suppr超能文献

GC-MS 和 UHPLC-MS 策略联用分析荆芥及其炭荆芥的化学成分特征及比较。

Chemical Characteristics and Comparison of Schizonepetae Herba and Schizonepetae Herba Carbonisata by Combination of GC-MS and UHPLC-MS Strategies.

机构信息

Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine Processing Technology Innovation Center of Hebei Province, College of Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang 050200, China.

Hebei Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hebei Industrial Technology Institute for Traditional Chinese Medicine Preparation, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2023 Jul 17;106(4):970-978. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Schizonepetae Herba (SH, Jingjie) and Schizonepetae Herba Carbonisata (SHC, Jingjie Tan) are two different forms of the same herbal material, with SHC being the processed product of SH. The different clinical efficacies of SH and SHC may be caused by changes in their chemical compositions. Despite this, there have been few studies that have reported on the comparative identification of SH and SHC. Therefore, the aims of this experiment are to investigate the differential changes of non-volatile and volatile components before and after SH processing.

OBJECTIVES

To establish combination strategies for identifying the chemical markers in SH and SHC using ultra-HPLC-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS) and headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS).

METHODS

UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS and HS-GC-MS methods was utilized to comprehensively discriminate between SH and SHC. To identify chemical markers, principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were performed on 14 batches of SH and SHC.

RESULTS

A total of 71 non-volatile compounds and 81 volatile compounds were tentatively identified in SH and SHC. Among these, 14 non-volatile compounds and 18 volatile oils were found to be potential characteristic markers that can differentiate between SH and SHC.

CONCLUSION

The present work provides valuable information for understanding the chemical differences between SH and SHC. The results obtained from this research may serve as a scientific foundation for comprehensively revealing the mechanisms involved in the carbonizing processing method of stir-frying SH.

HIGHLIGHTS

The chemical changes that occur before and after carbonizing SH were investigated using integrated methods based on LC-MS and GC-MS, and chemical markers in SH and SHC were identified.

摘要

背景

荆芥(SH)和荆芥炭(SHC)是同一种草药的两种不同形式,SHC 是 SH 的加工品。SH 和 SHC 的不同临床疗效可能是由于其化学成分的变化所致。尽管如此,关于 SH 和 SHC 的比较鉴定,鲜有研究报道。因此,本实验旨在研究 SH 加工前后非挥发性和挥发性成分的差异变化。

目的

采用超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱(UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS)和顶空气相色谱-质谱(HS-GC-MS)建立鉴定 SH 和 SHC 中化学标志物的组合策略。

方法

利用 UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS 和 HS-GC-MS 方法全面区分 SH 和 SHC。为了鉴定化学标志物,对 14 批 SH 和 SHC 进行主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘判别分析(OPLS-DA)。

结果

在 SH 和 SHC 中分别初步鉴定出 71 种非挥发性化合物和 81 种挥发性化合物。其中,发现 14 种非挥发性化合物和 18 种挥发油是区分 SH 和 SHC 的潜在特征标志物。

结论

本研究为理解 SH 和 SHC 之间的化学差异提供了有价值的信息。本研究的结果可为全面揭示炒荆芥炭炮制方法的机制提供科学依据。

重点

采用 LC-MS 和 GC-MS 相结合的综合方法研究了 SH 炭化前后的化学变化,并鉴定了 SH 和 SHC 中的化学标志物。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验