Suppr超能文献

美国癌症中心前列腺癌局部消融治疗的当代模式:来自国家登记处的数据。

Contemporary patterns of local ablative therapies for prostate cancer at United States cancer centers: results from a national registry.

机构信息

Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2023 May;41(5):1309-1315. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04354-7. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the national-level patterns of care for local ablative therapy among men with PCa and identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with the receipt of these techniques.

METHODS

We retrospectively interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for men with clinically localized PCa between 2010 and 2017. The main outcome was receipt of local tumor ablation with either cryo- or laser-ablation, and "other method of local tumor destruction including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)". Patient level, hospital level, and demographic variables were collected. Mixed effect logistic regression models were fitted to identify separately patient- and hospital-level predictors of receipt of local ablative therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,278 patients received ablative therapy, of whom 78.8% had cryotherapy, 15.6% had laser, and 5.7% had another method including HIFU. At the patient level, men with intermediate-risk PCa were more likely to be treated with local ablative therapy (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.11; p = 0.05), as were men with Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1 (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29-1.43; p < 0.01), men between 71 and 80 years (OR 3.70; 95% CI 3.43-3.99; p < 0.01), men with Medicare insurance (OR 1.38; 95% 1.31-1.46; p < 0.01), and an income < $47,999 (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.21; p < 0.01). At the hospital-level, local ablative therapy was less likely to be performed in academic/research facilities (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32-0.64; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Local ablative therapy for PCa treatment is more commonly offered among older and comorbid patients. Future studies should investigate the uptake of these technologies in non-hospital-based settings and in light of recent changes in insurance coverage.

摘要

目的

描述 2010 年至 2017 年间接受局部消融治疗的局限性前列腺癌男性患者的全国性治疗模式,并确定与接受这些技术相关的患者和医院层面的因素。

方法

我们回顾性地从国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中检索了 2010 年至 2017 年间患有局限性前列腺癌的男性患者的临床资料。主要结局为接受局部肿瘤消融治疗,包括冷冻消融或激光消融,以及“其他局部肿瘤破坏方法,包括高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)”。收集患者水平、医院水平和人口统计学变量。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型分别确定患者和医院水平接受局部消融治疗的预测因素。

结果

总体而言,11278 名患者接受了消融治疗,其中 78.8%接受了冷冻消融治疗,15.6%接受了激光治疗,5.7%接受了包括 HIFU 在内的其他方法。在患者层面上,中危前列腺癌患者更有可能接受局部消融治疗(OR 1.05;95%CI 1.00-1.11;p=0.05),Charlson 合并症指数>1 的患者(OR 1.36;95%CI 1.29-1.43;p<0.01),71 至 80 岁之间的患者(OR 3.70;95%CI 3.43-3.99;p<0.01),医疗保险的患者(OR 1.38;95%CI 1.31-1.46;p<0.01),收入<47999 美元的患者(OR 1.16;95%CI 1.06-1.21;p<0.01)。在医院层面上,在学术/研究机构接受局部消融治疗的可能性较小(OR 0.45;95%CI 0.32-0.64;p<0.01)。

结论

局部消融治疗前列腺癌的治疗方法在老年和合并症患者中更为常见。未来的研究应该调查这些技术在非医院环境中的应用情况,并根据最近的保险覆盖范围的变化进行研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验