• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症护理中新颖的以患者为中心的结局指标:在家天数——一项范围综述研究方案。

Novel patient-centred outcome in cancer care, days at home: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 17;13(3):e071201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071201.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071201
PMID:36931670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10030791/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient-centred care is valued by patients and providers. As management of cancer becomes increasingly complex, the value of providing care that incorporates an individual's values and preferences along with demographic and tumour factors is increasingly important. To improve care, patients with cancer need easily accessible information on the outcomes important to them. The patient-centred outcome, days at home (DAH), is based on a construct that measures the time a patient spends alive and out of hospitals and healthcare institutions. DAH is accurately measured from various data sources and has shown construct validity with many patient-centred outcomes. There is significant heterogeneity in terms used and definitions for DAH in cancer care. This scoping review aims to consolidate information on the outcome DAH in cancer care and to review definitions and terms used to date to guide future use of DAH as a patient-centred care, research and policy tool.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review protocol has been designed with joint guidance from the and the expanded framework from Arksey and O'Malley. We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus for studies measuring DAH, or equivalent, in the context of active adult cancer care. Broad inclusion criteria have been developed, given the recent introduction of DAH into cancer literature. Editorials, opinion pieces, case reports, abstracts, dissertations, protocols, reviews, narrative studies and grey literature will be excluded. Two authors will independently perform full-text selection. Data will be extracted, charted and summarised both qualitatively and quantitively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval is required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated through scientific publication and presentation at relevant conferences.

摘要

简介

以患者为中心的护理受到患者和医护人员的重视。随着癌症管理变得越来越复杂,提供既包含个人价值观和偏好,又包含人口统计学和肿瘤因素的护理的重要性日益增加。为了改善护理,癌症患者需要能够轻松获取对他们重要的结果相关信息。以患者为中心的结果,即在家天数(DAH),是基于一个衡量患者在医院和医疗机构外生存和康复时间的指标。DAH 可以通过多种数据源准确测量,并已通过多项以患者为中心的结果证明了其构建效度。在癌症护理中,DAH 的使用术语和定义存在显著的异质性。本范围综述旨在整合癌症护理中 DAH 结果的信息,并回顾迄今为止用于指导 DAH 作为以患者为中心的护理、研究和政策工具的定义和术语。

方法和分析

本范围综述方案是在与 以及 Arksey 和 O'Malley 扩展框架的联合指导下设计的。我们将系统地在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 中搜索测量 DAH 或与之等效的研究,这些研究是在成人癌症护理的背景下进行的。鉴于 DAH 最近被引入癌症文献,我们制定了广泛的纳入标准。社论、观点文章、病例报告、摘要、论文、方案、综述、叙事研究和灰色文献将被排除在外。两名作者将独立进行全文筛选。将定性和定量地提取、图表和总结数据。

伦理和传播

本范围综述不需要伦理批准。结果将通过科学出版物和相关会议的演讲进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7a4/10030791/c07a77bb57d7/bmjopen-2022-071201f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7a4/10030791/c07a77bb57d7/bmjopen-2022-071201f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7a4/10030791/c07a77bb57d7/bmjopen-2022-071201f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Novel patient-centred outcome in cancer care, days at home: a scoping review protocol.癌症护理中新颖的以患者为中心的结局指标:在家天数——一项范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 17;13(3):e071201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071201.
2
Patient-centered outcomes for gastrointestinal cancer care: a scoping review protocol.以患者为中心的胃肠道癌症护理结局评价:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;12(6):e061309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061309.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators.针对以患者为中心的质量指标进行识别和分类的范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e013632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013632.
6
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
7
Assessing research methodologies used to evaluate inequalities in end-of-life cancer care research: a scoping review protocol.评估用于评估癌症临终关怀研究中不平等现象的研究方法:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):e064743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064743.
8
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
9
Family participation in dignity interventions for patients with cancer receiving palliative care: a scoping review protocol.家庭参与对接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的尊严干预:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e090338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090338.
10
Medical complexity in emergency and urgent care settings: a scoping review protocol.急诊和紧急护理环境中的医疗复杂性:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086984.

引用本文的文献

1
Curative intent therapy of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a patient-centered precision approach to assess, measure, and interpret benefits and harms.I-III期非小细胞肺癌的根治性意向治疗:一种以患者为中心的精准方法,用于评估、衡量和解释获益与危害。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):4473-4500. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-213. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Real-World Evidence Acceptability and Use in Breast Cancer Treatment Decision-Making in the United States: Call-to-Action from a Multidisciplinary Think Tank.美国乳腺癌治疗决策中真实世界证据的可接受性与应用:多学科智库的行动呼吁
Adv Ther. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03201-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Time Toxicity of Cancer Treatment.癌症治疗的时间毒性
J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1611-1615. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02810. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
2
Healthy days at home: A population-based quality measure for cancer patients at the end of life.在家的健康日:生命末期癌症患者的一项基于人群的质量衡量指标。
Cancer. 2021 Nov 15;127(22):4249-4257. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33817. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Days alive and at home after hip fracture: a cross-sectional validation of a patient-centred outcome measure using routinely collected data.
Days at home after surgery as a perioperative outcome: scoping review and recommendations for use in health services research.
手术后在家天数作为围手术期结局:范围综述及在卫生服务研究中的应用建议
Br J Surg. 2024 Nov 27;111(12). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae278.
4
Normality and compassionate care: experiences from advanced cancer patients in their last time at home.常态与关怀:晚期癌症患者在家中临终时的体验。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02499-x.
髋部骨折后存活和在家的天数:使用常规收集数据验证以患者为中心的结局测量指标
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Sep;32(9):546-556. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013150. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
5
Patient-Centered Time-at-Home Outcomes in Older Adults After Surgical Cancer Treatment.老年癌症手术治疗后以患者为中心的居家时间结局。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov 1;155(11):e203754. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3754. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
6
Cancer patients' preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decision-making: an epidemiological study.癌症患者对治疗决策参与的偏好和感知水平:一项流行病学研究。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Aug;59(8):967-974. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1762926. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Socioeconomic Status and Days Alive and Out of Hospital after Major Elective Noncardiac Surgery: A Population-based Cohort Study.社会经济地位与主要择期非心脏手术后的存活天数和出院天数:基于人群的队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):713-722. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003123.
8
Days Alive and Out of Hospital: Validation of a Patient-centered Outcome for Perioperative Medicine.存活天数和出院情况:围手术期医学以患者为中心的结局的验证。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jul;131(1):84-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002701.
9
Home Time as a Patient-Centered Outcome in Administrative Claims Data.家庭时间作为行政索赔数据中的以患者为中心的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Feb;67(2):347-351. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15705. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.