Neurology Unit, Neurorehabilitation and Neuropsychology Service, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico.
Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Research Unit, Mondino Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico.
Neuropsychology. 2023 Oct;37(7):837-845. doi: 10.1037/neu0000896. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
Self-assessment scales are broadly used to evaluate empathy in neurological patients, but it is conceivable that some discrepancy with caregiver evaluation may emerge as consequence of reduced self-awareness. The aim of the present study was to verify the presence of discrepancies in the self-assessment of empathy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to explore their neural correlates.
Twenty MCI patients and 38 healthy controls (HCs) underwent the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), exploring the following four aspects of empathy: perspective taking (PT), fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The questionnaire was administered in two modalities: self-administered, and administered to an informant, and the scores were compared. The correlation between discrepancies and regional cortical thickness was assessed.
The self-administered version of IRI showed higher PT scores in MCI as compared to HC ( = .017), with no differences detected in the other subscales. The difference between the scores obtained in the self-administered and in the informant-administered IRI-PT was significantly higher in MCI than in HCs ( = .006).
The self-assessment of empathy in subjects with MCI may be misleading because of a tendency toward an overestimation of the PT ability, typically considered as a cognitive component of empathy. Our results may reflect a particular aspect of reduced self-awareness in MCI subjects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
自我评估量表广泛用于评估神经科患者的同理心,但可以想象,由于自我意识降低,可能会与护理人员的评估出现一些差异。本研究的目的是验证轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 患者在同理心自我评估中是否存在差异,并探讨其神经相关性。
20 名 MCI 患者和 38 名健康对照者 (HC) 接受了人际反应指数 (IRI) 测试,该测试探讨了同理心的四个方面:观点采择 (PT)、幻想、共情关注和个人痛苦。问卷以两种方式进行管理:自我管理和向知情人管理,并比较得分。评估了差异与区域皮质厚度之间的相关性。
与 HC 相比,MCI 患者的 IRI 自我评估版本显示出更高的 PT 分数 ( =.017),而其他子量表则没有差异。在 MCI 中,自我管理和知情人管理的 IRI-PT 评分之间的差异明显高于 HC ( =.006)。
MCI 患者的同理心自我评估可能会产生误导,因为他们倾向于高估 PT 能力,通常被认为是同理心的认知成分。我们的结果可能反映了 MCI 患者自我意识降低的一个特殊方面。