Suppr超能文献

2018 年心脏分配政策实施后,心脏移植候补名单的地理分配更加广泛,等待移植的结果也更好。

Greater geographic sharing and heart transplantation waitlist outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation policy.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction (MiCHAMP) and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Jul;42(7):936-942. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2018, a new heart allocation policy was introduced to reduce variability in access to and outcomes after transplantation, in part, through attempts at broader geographic sharing of donor hearts. We evaluated how this policy affected geographic sharing and waitlist outcomes by donation service area (DSA).

METHODS

This retrospective study of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database included adult patients waitlisted between October 2016 and October 2020, stratified by policy period. Our primary outcomes were mean proportion of imported and exported hearts aggregated by DSA as well as time to transplant.

RESULTS

Following the policy change, there was substantial evidence of sharing across DSAs. The mean proportion of imported hearts transplanted by a DSA increased from 32% (95% CI: 27%-36%) to 74% (95% CI: 71%-78%; p < 0.001), and the mean proportion of exported hearts increased from 37% (95% CI: 33%-42%) to 75% (95% CI: 71%-79%; p < 0.001). The mean sharing ratio, defined as the log-transformed ratio of imported to exported hearts per DSA, shifted from 1.15 (95% CI: 0.88-1.42) to 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96-1.07), with a 76% decline in the variance across DSAs. As sharing increased, time to transplant per DSA declined from 153.9 days (95% CI, 143.4-164.4 days) pre-policy to 89.6 days (95% CI, 83.1-96.1 days) post-policy (p < 0.001). A larger decrease in waitlist time was associated with a higher proportion of exported hearts.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2018 heart allocation policy was associated with more uniform access to heart transplantation and improved waitlist outcomes.

摘要

背景

2018 年,推出了一项新的心脏分配政策,旨在通过更广泛的地理区域内的供体心脏共享,减少移植后获得和结果的可变性。我们评估了该政策如何通过供体服务区域(DSA)影响地理区域共享和等待名单的结果。

方法

这项对移植受者登记处数据库的回顾性研究纳入了 2016 年 10 月至 2020 年 10 月期间按政策时期分层的成年患者。我们的主要结局是按 DSA 汇总的进口和出口心脏的平均比例以及移植时间。

结果

政策变更后,证据表明各 DSA 之间存在大量的共享。DSA 移植的进口心脏的平均比例从 32%(95%CI:27%-36%)增加到 74%(95%CI:71%-78%;p<0.001),出口心脏的平均比例从 37%(95%CI:33%-42%)增加到 75%(95%CI:71%-79%;p<0.001)。平均共享比率定义为每个 DSA 的进口与出口心脏对数比,从 1.15(95%CI:0.88-1.42)变为 1.02(95%CI:0.96-1.07),DSA 之间的方差下降了 76%。随着共享的增加,每个 DSA 的移植时间从政策前的 153.9 天(95%CI,143.4-164.4 天)减少到政策后的 89.6 天(95%CI,83.1-96.1 天)(p<0.001)。等待名单时间的较大减少与更高比例的出口心脏有关。

结论

2018 年的心脏分配政策与更公平地获得心脏移植和改善等待名单结果相关。

相似文献

1
Greater geographic sharing and heart transplantation waitlist outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation policy.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Jul;42(7):936-942. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
2
Effect of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on lung transplant waitlist outcomes.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
The heart transplant allocation change attenuates but does not eliminate blood group O waitlist outcome disadvantage.
Clin Transplant. 2022 May;36(5):e14620. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14620. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
4
Impact of the 2018 change in US allocation policy on adults with congenital heart disease.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Mar;41(3):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
5
The effect of the Statewide Sharing variance on geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):1449-60. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05350513. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
7
Validating thoracic simulated allocation model predictions for impact of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on transplant waitlist outcomes.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 May;39(5):433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Impact of the 2018 UNOS Heart Transplant Policy Changes on Patient Outcomes.
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 May;11(5):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Improved waitlist and comparable post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 heart allocation system.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;167(3):1064-1076.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.012. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Association of the 2018 U.S. Heart Allocation Policy Change and the Survival Benefit of Heart Transplantation.
JACC Heart Fail. 2025 Jul;13(7):102480. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.02.026. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
4
Outcomes of Heart Transplant Using High Donor Sequence Number Offers.
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:325-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
Heart Transplantation.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 18;13(2):558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020558.

本文引用的文献

2
Between-center variation in high-priority listing status under the new heart allocation policy.
Am J Transplant. 2021 Nov;21(11):3684-3693. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16614. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
One-Year Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation Under the New Donor Heart Allocation System in the United States.
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;14(2):e007754. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007754. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):173-180. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5395.
5
Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):159-167. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4909.
6
Changes in the United States Adult Heart Allocation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Oct;13(10):e005795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005795. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision.
Am J Transplant. 2020 Oct;20(10):2781-2790. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16010. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
8
An early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United States.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jan;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验