• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国对儿科磁共振和计算机断层成像镇静实践的调查。

French survey of sedation practices for pediatric magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging.

机构信息

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnelé, 37044, Tours, France.

UMR 1253, iBrain, Inserm, University of Tours, 37000, Tours, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Jul;53(8):1669-1674. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05635-4. Epub 2023 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00247-023-05635-4
PMID:36932258
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tompgraphy (CT) require patient immobility and therefore often require sedation or general anesthesia of patients. Consensus on these procedures is lacking in France.

OBJECTIVE

Thus, the aim of this study was to describe the current sedation practices for pediatric MRI and CT in France.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2019, an online questionnaire was delivered by electronic mail to a representative radiologist in 60 pediatric radiology centers registered by the French-speaking pediatric and prenatal imaging society. Questions included protocols, drugs used, monitoring and side effects.

RESULTS

Representatives of 40 of the 60 (67%) radiology centers responded to the survey. Among them, 31 performed sedation including 17 (55%) centers where radiologists performed sedation without anesthesiologists present during the procedure. The premedication drugs were hydroxyzine (n = 8, 80%) and melatonin (n = 2, 20%), Sedation drugs used for children ages 0 to 6 years old were pentobarbital (n = 9, 60%), midazolam (n = 2, 13%), chloral hydrate (n = 2, 13%), diazepam (n = 1, 6.5%) and chlorpromazine (n = 1, 6.5%). A written sedation protocol was available in 10/17 (59%) centers. In 6/17 (35%) centers, no monitoring was used during the procedures. Blood pressure monitoring and capnography were rarely used (< 10%) and post-sedation monitoring was heterogeneous. No life-threatening adverse effect was reported, but 6 centers reported at least one incident per year.

CONCLUSION

For half of the responding radiology centers, radiologists performed sedation alone in agreement with the local anesthesiology team. Sedation procedures and monitoring were heterogenous among centers. Adjustment and harmonization of the practices according to the capacity of each center may be useful.

摘要

背景

儿科磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)需要患者保持不动,因此通常需要对患者进行镇静或全身麻醉。法国缺乏对此类程序的共识。

目的

因此,本研究旨在描述法国目前儿科 MRI 和 CT 的镇静实践。

材料和方法

从 2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,通过电子邮件向法语儿科和产前影像学协会注册的 60 个儿科放射科中心中的一名代表放射科医生发送了在线问卷。问题包括方案、使用的药物、监测和副作用。

结果

在 60 个放射科中心中有 40 个(67%)的代表对调查做出了回应。其中,31 个中心进行了镇静,其中 17 个(55%)中心在没有麻醉师在场的情况下由放射科医生进行镇静。预给药药物为羟嗪(n=8,80%)和褪黑素(n=2,20%)。用于 0 至 6 岁儿童的镇静药物为戊巴比妥(n=9,60%)、咪达唑仑(n=2,13%)、水合氯醛(n=2,13%)、地西泮(n=1,6.5%)和氯丙嗪(n=1,6.5%)。17 个中心中的 10 个(59%)有书面镇静方案。在 17 个中心中的 6 个(35%)中心,在程序中未使用任何监测。血压监测和呼气末二氧化碳监测很少使用(<10%),镇静后监测方法各不相同。没有报告危及生命的不良事件,但 6 个中心每年至少报告 1 起事件。

结论

对于一半的回应放射科中心,放射科医生在与当地麻醉团队协商一致的情况下单独进行镇静。中心之间的镇静程序和监测方法存在差异。根据每个中心的能力调整和协调实践可能是有用的。

相似文献

1
French survey of sedation practices for pediatric magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging.法国对儿科磁共振和计算机断层成像镇静实践的调查。
Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Jul;53(8):1669-1674. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05635-4. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
2
Chloral hydrate sedation of children undergoing CT and MR imaging: safety as judged by American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.水合氯醛对接受CT和MR成像的儿童进行镇静:根据美国儿科学会指南判断安全性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Oct;165(4):905-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676990.
3
A survey of post-discharge side effects of conscious sedation using chloral hydrate in pediatric CT and MR imaging.小儿CT和MR成像中使用水合氯醛进行清醒镇静后出院后副作用的调查。
Pediatr Radiol. 1999 Apr;29(4):287-90. doi: 10.1007/s002470050590.
4
Safe pediatric outpatient sedation: the chloral hydrate debate revisited.安全的儿科门诊镇静:水合氯醛之争再探讨
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Jan;116(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989770352-8.
5
Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children.儿童诊断性成像研究中镇静的恢复时间延长及副作用延迟出现。
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.3.e42.
6
Chloral hydrate in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of a 10-year sedation experience administered by radiologists.水合氯醛在儿科磁共振成像中的应用:放射科医生10年镇静经验的评估
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Jan;45(1):108-14. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3091-0. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging.戊巴比妥与水合氯醛在婴儿影像学检查中镇静效果的比较:戊巴比妥的优势
Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):537-42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302030107. Epub 2003 Dec 29.
8
[Sedation with oral hydroxyzine and rectal chloral hydrate in pediatric MRI and CT].[小儿MRI和CT检查中口服羟嗪与直肠水合氯醛镇静]
J Radiol. 1996 Dec;77(12):1189-92; discussion 1193-4.
9
Sedation for pediatric patients undergoing CT and MRI.接受CT和MRI检查的儿科患者的镇静
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-6. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199201000-00002.
10
Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients using chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and nitrous oxide--a retrospective study of 382 sedations.使用水合氯醛、羟嗪和一氧化二氮对儿童牙科患者进行清醒镇静——382例镇静的回顾性研究
Pediatr Dent. 1995 Nov-Dec;17(7):424-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedation and anesthesia for imaging of the infant and neonate-a brief review.镇静和麻醉在婴儿和新生儿成像中的应用:简要综述。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Sep;54(10):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05995-5. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Provision of Safe Anesthesia in Magnetic Resonance Environments: Degree of Compliance with International Guidelines in Saudi Arabia.磁共振环境下安全麻醉的提供:沙特阿拉伯对国际指南的遵守程度
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 10;11(18):2508. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182508.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes following early exposure to general anesthetics.早期接触全身麻醉后的长期认知和行为结果。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2022 Aug 1;35(4):442-447. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001155. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
"Feed and Swaddle" method of Infants Undergoing Head CT for minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department - A comparative case review.儿科急诊行头部 CT 检查的轻微头部外伤婴儿的“喂养和包裹”方法-病例对照研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110399. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110399. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
3
Impact of surgery and anesthesia during early brain development: A perfect storm.
早期脑发育过程中手术和麻醉的影响:完美风暴。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Jun;32(6):697-705. doi: 10.1111/pan.14433. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging with radial k-space sampling for neonates and infants to reduce anesthesia.自由呼吸磁共振成像采用放射状 k 空间采样,用于减少新生儿和婴儿的麻醉。
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Jun;52(7):1326-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05298-7. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Safety challenges related to the use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examinations.与儿科患者磁共振成像检查中镇静和全身麻醉使用相关的安全性挑战。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 May;51(5):724-735. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05044-5. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Should I irradiate with computed tomography or sedate for magnetic resonance imaging?我应该用计算机断层扫描进行放射治疗还是用磁共振成像进行镇静?
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Feb;52(2):340-344. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-04984-2. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
7
COVID-19 impact assessment on the French radiological centers: a nationwide survey.COVID-19 对法国放射学中心的影响评估:一项全国性调查。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6537-6544. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07035-w. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
8
Impact on child and parent anxiety level of a teddy bear-scale mock magnetic resonance scanner.泰迪熊尺寸模拟磁共振扫描仪对儿童及家长焦虑水平的影响
Pediatr Radiol. 2020 Jan;50(1):116-120. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04514-1. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Analysis of the French national evaluation of radiology residents.法国放射科住院医师国家评估分析。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Mar;100(3):185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
10
Latent Class Analysis of Neurodevelopmental Deficit After Exposure to Anesthesia in Early Childhood.幼儿期接触麻醉后神经发育缺陷的潜在类别分析
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2017 Jul;29(3):264-273. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000303.