School of Education, Department of Psychiatry and the MIND Institute, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Autism Res. 2023 Apr;16(4):697-712. doi: 10.1002/aur.2910. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
The fuzzy nature of categories of psychopathology, such as autism, leads to significant research challenges. Alternatively, focusing research on the study of a common set of important and well-defined psychological constructs across psychiatric conditions may make the fundamental etiological processes of psychopathology easier to discern and treat (Cuthbert, 2022). The development of the research domain criteria (RDoC) framework is designed to guide this new research approach (Insel et al., 2010). However, progress in research may be expected to continually refine and reorganize the understanding of the specifics of these mental processes (Cuthbert & Insel, 2013). Moreover, knowledge gleaned from the study of both normative and atypical development can be mutually informative in the evolution of our understanding of these fundamental processes. A case in point is the study of social attention. This Autism 101 commentary provides an educational summary of research over the last few decades indicates that social attention is major construct in the study of human social-cognitive development, autism and other forms of psychopathology. The commentary also describes how this research can inform the Social Process dimension of the RDoC framework.
精神病理学范畴的模糊性,如自闭症,给研究带来了重大挑战。相反,将研究重点放在研究一组常见的、重要的和明确定义的心理结构上,这些心理结构存在于各种精神疾病中,这可能使精神病理学的基本病因过程更容易被发现和治疗(Cuthbert,2022)。研究领域标准(RDoC)框架的发展旨在指导这种新的研究方法(Insel 等人,2010)。然而,预计研究进展将不断完善和重组对这些心理过程具体内容的理解(Cuthbert 和 Insel,2013)。此外,从规范和非典型发展的研究中获得的知识,在我们对这些基本过程的理解的发展中可以相互提供信息。一个恰当的例子是对社会注意力的研究。本自闭症 101 评论提供了过去几十年研究的教育性总结,表明社会注意力是人类社会认知发展、自闭症和其他形式的精神病理学研究的主要结构。该评论还描述了这项研究如何为 RDoC 框架的社会过程维度提供信息。