Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MR Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Kokereiallee 7, Building C84, 45141, Essen, Germany.
High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
MAGMA. 2023 Oct;36(5):725-735. doi: 10.1007/s10334-023-01074-2. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
This study presents an extended evaluation of a numerical approach to simulate artifacts of metallic implants in an MR environment.
The numerical approach is validated by comparing the artifact shape of the simulations and measurements of two metallic orthopedic implants at three different field strengths (1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T). Furthermore, this study presents three additional use cases of the numerical simulation. The first one shows how numerical simulations can improve the artifact size evaluation according to ASTM F2119. The second use case quantifies the influence of different imaging parameters (TE and bandwidth) on the artifact size. Finally, the third use case shows the potential of performing human model artifact simulations.
The numerical simulation approach shows a dice similarity coefficient of 0.74 between simulated and measured artifact sizes of metallic implants. The alternative artifact size calculation method presented in this study shows that the artifact size of the ASTM-based method is up to 50% smaller for complex shaped implants compared to the numerical-based approach.
In conclusion, the numerical approach could be used in the future to extend MR safety testing according to a revision of the ASTM F2119 standard and for design optimization during the development process of implants.
本研究对一种数值方法进行了扩展评估,以模拟磁共振环境中金属植入物的伪影。
通过比较两种金属骨科植入物在三个不同场强(1.5T、3T 和 7T)下的模拟和测量的伪影形状,验证了数值方法的准确性。此外,本研究还介绍了数值模拟的三个额外应用案例。第一个案例展示了如何根据 ASTM F2119 标准,通过数值模拟来改善伪影大小的评估。第二个应用案例量化了不同成像参数(TE 和带宽)对伪影大小的影响。最后,第三个应用案例展示了进行人体模型伪影模拟的潜力。
数值模拟方法显示,金属植入物的模拟和测量伪影大小之间的骰子相似系数为 0.74。本研究中提出的替代伪影大小计算方法表明,与基于数值的方法相比,基于 ASTM 方法的伪影大小对于复杂形状的植入物小了高达 50%。
总之,该数值方法未来可用于根据 ASTM F2119 标准的修订扩展磁共振安全性测试,并在植入物的开发过程中进行设计优化。