• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

样本处理技术对人工智能细胞检测与分类的影响

Effect of Specimen Processing Technique on Cell Detection and Classification by Artificial Intelligence.

作者信息

Maruyama Sayumi, Sakabe Nanako, Ito Chihiro, Shimoyama Yuka, Sato Shouichi, Ikeda Katsuhide

机构信息

Pathophysiology Sciences, Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Clinical Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Juntendo University, Urayasu, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 May 2;159(5):448-454. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac178.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqac178
PMID:36933198
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cytomorphology is known to differ depending on the processing technique, and these differences pose a problem for automated diagnosis using deep learning. We examined the as-yet unclarified relationship between cell detection or classification using artificial intelligence (AI) and the AutoSmear (Sakura Finetek Japan) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) processing techniques.

METHODS

The "You Only Look Once" (YOLO), version 5x, algorithm was trained on the AutoSmear and LBC preparations of 4 cell lines: lung cancer (LC), cervical cancer (CC), malignant pleural mesothelioma (MM), and esophageal cancer (EC). Detection and classification rates were used to evaluate the accuracy of cell detection.

RESULTS

When preparations of the same processing technique were used for training and detection in the 1-cell (1C) model, the AutoSmear model had a higher detection rate than the LBC model. When different processing techniques were used for training and detection, detection rates of LC and CC were significantly lower in the 4-cell (4C) model than in the 1C model, and those of MM and EC were approximately 10% lower in the 4C model.

CONCLUSIONS

In AI-based cell detection and classification, attention should be paid to cells whose morphologies change significantly depending on the processing technique, further suggesting the creation of a training model.

摘要

目的

已知细胞形态学因处理技术而异,这些差异给使用深度学习的自动诊断带来了问题。我们研究了使用人工智能(AI)进行细胞检测或分类与自动涂片法(樱花精技株式会社)和液基细胞学(LBC)处理技术之间尚未阐明的关系。

方法

使用“你只看一次”(YOLO)v5x算法对4种细胞系(肺癌(LC)、宫颈癌(CC)、恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MM)和食管癌(EC))的自动涂片和LBC标本进行训练。检测率和分类率用于评估细胞检测的准确性。

结果

在单细胞(1C)模型中,当使用相同处理技术的标本进行训练和检测时,自动涂片模型的检测率高于LBC模型。当使用不同处理技术进行训练和检测时,在四细胞(4C)模型中,LC和CC的检测率显著低于1C模型,MM和EC的检测率在4C模型中约低10%。

结论

在基于AI的细胞检测和分类中,应关注形态因处理技术而显著变化的细胞,这进一步表明需要创建一个训练模型。

相似文献

1
Effect of Specimen Processing Technique on Cell Detection and Classification by Artificial Intelligence.样本处理技术对人工智能细胞检测与分类的影响
Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 May 2;159(5):448-454. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac178.
2
Relationship between a deep learning model and liquid-based cytological processing techniques.深度学习模型与液基细胞学处理技术的关系。
Cytopathology. 2023 Jul;34(4):308-317. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13235. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
Relationship between Liquid-Based Cytology Preservative Solutions and Artificial Intelligence: Liquid-Based Cytology Specimen Cell Detection Using YOLOv5 Deep Convolutional Neural Network.基于液体的细胞学保存液与人工智能的关系:使用 YOLOv5 深度学习卷积神经网络进行基于液体的细胞学标本细胞检测。
Acta Cytol. 2022;66(6):542-550. doi: 10.1159/000526098. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology.液基细胞学与传统细胞学在宫颈异常细胞检测中的效能比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(16):7381-4. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.16.7381.
5
A randomized trial comparing conventional cytology to liquid-based cytology and computer assistance.一项比较传统细胞学与液基细胞学和计算机辅助的随机试验。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Jun 15;132(12):2849-57. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27955. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
Artificial intelligence-assisted cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer: A multicenter, clinical-based, observational study.人工智能辅助细胞学检测宫颈上皮内瘤变或浸润性癌:一项多中心、基于临床的观察性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.099. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
7
A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.液基细胞学与传统细胞学在宫颈癌筛查中的比较。
Acta Cytol. 2012;56(4):370-4. doi: 10.1159/000337641. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
A screening assistance system for cervical cytology of squamous cell atypia based on a two-step combined CNN algorithm with label smoothing.基于两步级联卷积神经网络算法与标签平滑的宫颈细胞学鳞状细胞不典型性筛查辅助系统。
Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(2):520-529. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4460. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
9
Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates.将SurePath、ThinPrep和传统细胞学作为主要检测方法进行比较:SurePath与CIN II+检测率的提高相关。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jan;27(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0678-1. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
10
The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.人工智能辅助细胞学诊断系统在大规模宫颈癌筛查中的应用:一项基于人群的 70 万名妇女的队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6896-6906. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3296. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Smart nanomedicines powered by artificial intelligence: a breakthrough in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.由人工智能驱动的智能纳米药物:肺癌诊断与治疗的一项突破。
Med Oncol. 2025 Mar 25;42(5):134. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02680-x.
2
A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.人工智能在肺癌临床应用的全面综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;17(5):882. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050882.