• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎癌患者的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:多中心环境下开放手术与视频内镜手术方法的比较

Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer patients: a comparison between open and video endoscopic approach in a multicenter setting.

作者信息

Bada Maida, Crocetto Felice, Nyirady Peter, Pagliarulo Vincenzo, Rapisarda Sebastiano, Aliberti Antonio, Boccasile Stefano, Ferro Matteo, Barone Biagio, Celia Antonio

机构信息

Department of Urology, San Bassanino Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Vicenza, Italy.

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology - Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 20;34(3):383-389. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0038. eCollection 2023 May 1.

DOI:10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0038
PMID:36933235
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare differences of operative outcomes, post-operative complications and survival outcomes between open and laparoscopic cases in a multicenter study.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study performed at three European centers from September 2011 to January 2019. The surgeon decision to perform open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) or video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) was done in each hospital after patient counselling. Inclusion criteria regarded a minimum follow-up of 9 months since the inguinal lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients with proven squamous cell penile cancer underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy. 26 of them underwent OIL, while 29 patients underwent VEIL. For the OIL and VEIL groups, the mean operative time was 2.5 vs. 3.4 h (p=0.129), respectively. Hospital stays were lower in the VEIL group with 4 vs. 8 days in OIL patients (p=0.053) while number of days requiring drains to remain was 3 vs. 6 days (p=0.024). The VEIL group reported a lower incidence of major complications compared to the OIL group (2 vs. 17%, p=0.0067) while minor complications were comparable in both groups. In a median follow-up period of 60 months, the overall survival was 65.5 and 84.6% in OIL and VEIL groups, respectively (p=0.105).

CONCLUSIONS

VEIL is comparable to OIL regarding safety, overall survival and post-operative outcomes.

摘要

目的

在一项多中心研究中比较开放手术与腹腔镜手术病例的手术结果、术后并发症及生存结果的差异。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,于2011年9月至2019年1月在三个欧洲中心进行。在每家医院,经患者咨询后,由外科医生决定进行开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(OIL)或视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEIL)。纳入标准为自腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后至少随访9个月。

结果

共有55例经证实的阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者接受了腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。其中26例接受了OIL,29例接受了VEIL。OIL组和VEIL组的平均手术时间分别为2.5小时和3.4小时(p = 0.129)。VEIL组的住院时间较短(4天,而OIL组患者为8天,p = 0.053),引流管留置天数为3天和6天(p = 0.024)。与OIL组相比,VEIL组报告的主要并发症发生率较低(2%对17%,p = 0.0067),而两组的轻微并发症相当。在中位随访期60个月时,OIL组和VEIL组的总生存率分别为65.5%和84.6%(p = 0.105)。

结论

在安全性、总生存率和术后结果方面,VEIL与OIL相当。

相似文献

1
Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer patients: a comparison between open and video endoscopic approach in a multicenter setting.阴茎癌患者的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:多中心环境下开放手术与视频内镜手术方法的比较
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 20;34(3):383-389. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0038. eCollection 2023 May 1.
2
Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.经下腹与经腿部皮下入路行视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的比较研究
J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):66-72. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0455.
3
Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?对于阴茎癌患者,视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的发病率会低于开放性淋巴结清扫术吗?
J Endourol. 2008 Aug;22(8):1687-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0386.
4
Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study.双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术同期双腹腔镜治疗阴茎癌:回顾性研究。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):112.e1-112.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
5
Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Standard and Lateral Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy: A Multinational Retrospective Study.标准与侧方视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的短期手术结果:一项多国回顾性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):373-377. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0733. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(RAVEIL)与视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEIL)对比开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(OILND)治疗阴茎癌:围手术期结果、并发症及肿瘤学结果的比较。一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):112.e11-112.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
Expanded criteria for video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in penile cancer: palpable lymph nodes.扩大视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术(VEIL)在阴茎癌中的适应证:可触及的淋巴结。
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):893; discussion 894. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.06.17.
8
[Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: Systematic review.].[阴茎癌的视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:系统评价。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Dec;72(10):992-999.
9
Extending boundaries in minimally invasive procedures with simultaneous bilateral video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (veil) for penile cancer: initial Denver health medical center and ABC school of medicine experience and surgical considerations.在微创手术中扩展边界,同时进行双侧视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术(面纱)治疗阴茎癌:丹佛健康医疗中心和 ABC 医学院的初步经验和手术考虑因素。
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):587-92. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.04.18.
10
A Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy and Conventional Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Treating Vulvar Cancer.视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与传统开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗外阴癌的比较研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Nov;27(9):1983-1989. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001100.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Study.阴茎鳞状细胞癌腹股沟淋巴结转移的预测因素:来自单中心回顾性研究的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 23;14(9):2921. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092921.
2
Exploring the Multifactorial Landscape of Penile Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk Factors.探索阴茎癌的多因素格局:危险因素的综合分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;14(16):1790. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161790.
3
Long-term oncological and surgical outcomes after Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in patients with penile cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Sexual Activity on the Risk of Male Genital Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature.性行为对男性生殖器肿瘤风险的影响:文献系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168500.
2
Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive.阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的技术管理:开放手术与微创手术对比
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2264-2271. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.04.02.
3
Urologic malignancies: advances in the analysis and interpretation of clinical findings.
阴茎癌患者行 Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy(VEIL)后的长期肿瘤学和手术结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Sep-Oct;49(5):580-589. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0065.
泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤:临床检查结果分析与解读的进展
Future Sci OA. 2021 Feb 4;7(4):FSO674. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0210.
4
Penile cancer.阴茎癌
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Feb 11;7(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00246-5.
5
Robot-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: A review of current outcomes.机器人辅助内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:当前结果综述
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis.视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术 (VEIL) 与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术 (O-ILND) 治疗阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的围手术期和生存结局的比较研究。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01189-x. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
7
Penile cancer: a Brazilian consensus statement for low- and middle-income countries.阴茎癌:一份针对低收入和中等收入国家的巴西共识声明。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;146(12):3281-3296. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03417-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Standard and Lateral Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy: A Multinational Retrospective Study.标准与侧方视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的短期手术结果:一项多国回顾性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):373-377. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0733. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection.确定阴茎鳞状细胞癌的最佳淋巴结检出量:手术解剖的预后影响。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):82-88. doi: 10.1111/bju.14883. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阴茎癌的视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的临床可行性及肿瘤学结局比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15862. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015862.