• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解个人价值观与支持烟草和酒精控制政策之间的关联。

Understanding Associations of Personal Values With Support for Tobacco and Alcohol Control Policies.

机构信息

Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch (HCIRB), Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch (HCIRB), Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):448-457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.010
PMID:36933752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10505251/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (N=3,604) examines the associations of personal values with tobacco and alcohol control policy support, which may inform policy-related communication efforts.

METHODS

Respondents selected which of 7 value options they considered most important in their daily life and rated their support for 8 proposed tobacco and alcohol control policies (1=strongly oppose, 5=strongly support). Weighted proportions for each value were described across sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status, and alcohol use. Weighted bivariate and multivariable regressions tested the associations of values with mean policy support (alpha=0.89). Analyses occurred from 2021 to 2022.

RESULTS

The most frequently selected values were assuring my family is safe and secure (30.2%), being happy (21.1%), and making my own decisions (13.6%). Selected values varied across sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. For example, people with lower education and incomes were overrepresented among those selecting making my own decisions and keeping myself in good health. After adjusting for sociodemographics, smoking, and alcohol use, people selecting family safety (β=0.20, 95% CI=0.06, 0.33) or religious connection (β=0.34, 95% CI=0.14, 0.54) as most important reported higher policy support than those selecting making their own decisions, the value associated with the lowest mean policy support. Mean policy support did not significantly differ across any other value comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Personal values are associated with support for alcohol and tobacco control policies, with making my own decisions associated with the lowest policy support. Future research and communication efforts may consider aligning tobacco and alcohol control policies with the idea of supporting autonomy.

摘要

简介

本研究利用 2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查(N=3604)的横断面数据分析,探讨了个人价值观与烟草和酒精控制政策支持的关联,这可能为相关政策沟通工作提供信息。

方法

受访者选择他们认为日常生活中最重要的 7 种价值观选项,并对 8 项拟议的烟草和酒精控制政策表示支持(1=强烈反对,5=强烈支持)。根据社会人口统计学特征、吸烟状况和饮酒情况,描述了每种价值观的加权比例。加权单变量和多变量回归检验了价值观与平均政策支持的关联(α=0.89)。分析于 2021 年至 2022 年进行。

结果

最常被选择的价值观是确保家人安全(30.2%)、快乐(21.1%)和自主决策(13.6%)。选择的价值观因社会人口统计学和行为特征而异。例如,受教育程度和收入较低的人更倾向于选择自主决策和保持身体健康。在调整了社会人口统计学、吸烟和饮酒因素后,选择家庭安全(β=0.20,95%CI=0.06,0.33)或宗教联系(β=0.34,95%CI=0.14,0.54)作为最重要的价值观的人,比选择自主决策的人报告了更高的政策支持率,而自主决策是与最低平均政策支持率相关的价值观。在任何其他价值观比较中,平均政策支持率均无显著差异。

结论

个人价值观与支持酒精和烟草控制政策相关,自主决策与最低的政策支持率相关。未来的研究和沟通工作可以考虑将烟草和酒精控制政策与支持自主的理念相协调。

相似文献

1
Understanding Associations of Personal Values With Support for Tobacco and Alcohol Control Policies.理解个人价值观与支持烟草和酒精控制政策之间的关联。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):448-457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Using the intervention ladder to examine policy influencer and general public support for potential tobacco control policies in Alberta and Quebec.利用干预阶梯来考察艾伯塔省和魁北克省的政策影响者和普通公众对潜在烟草控制政策的支持。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Feb;40(2):47-57. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.2.03.
3
Support for cancer prevention public health policies: results from a nationally representative sample of residents in the United States.支持癌症预防公共卫生政策:来自美国全国代表性居民样本的结果。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):1124-1132. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac056.
4
Smoking behaviours and attitudes towards campus-wide tobacco control policies among staff and students: a cross-sectional survey at the University of Birmingham.吸烟行为和对伯明翰大学全面禁烟政策的态度:伯明翰大学员工和学生的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8321-9.
5
Policy Influencer and General Public Support for Proposed Alcohol Healthy Public Policy Options in Alberta and Quebec, Canada.政策影响者和普通公众对加拿大艾伯塔省和魁北克省拟议的酒精健康公共政策选择的支持。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jan;81(1):47-57.
6
Association between tobacco and alcohol use among young adult bar patrons: a cross-sectional study in three cities.年轻成年酒吧顾客中烟草与酒精使用之间的关联:一项在三个城市开展的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 24;14:500. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-500.
7
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
8
Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study.公众对苏格兰和英格兰酒精控制政策的态度:一项混合方法研究的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
9
Relapse to problem drinking or trading up to spirits? Using U.S. national cross-sectional survey data to highlight possible negative impacts of potential tobacco retail changes.复饮或转向烈酒?利用美国全国横断面调查数据强调潜在烟草零售变化可能带来的负面影响。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Nov 1;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00498-8.
10
Exploring public support for novel tobacco and alcohol control policies in Great Britain 2021-2023: A population-based cross-sectional survey.2021 - 2023年英国公众对新型烟草和酒精控制政策的支持情况调查:一项基于人群的横断面调查
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 16;11(1):e41303. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41303. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Population-Level Dissemination of a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App: Quasi-Experimental Comparison of Values-Based Messages in Social Media Advertisements.戒烟智能手机应用在人群层面的传播:社交媒体广告中基于价值观信息的准实验比较
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jul 28;13:e71619. doi: 10.2196/71619.
2
Prosociality and public support for tobacco control policies among South Korean adults: A cross-sectional study.韩国成年人的亲社会行为与对烟草控制政策的公众支持:一项横断面研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 24;30:101809. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101809. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Within- and between-group heterogeneity in cultural models of emotion among people of European, Asian, and Latino heritage in the United States.美国欧洲、亚洲和拉丁裔血统人群情绪文化模型中的组内和组间异质性。
Emotion. 2023 Feb;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/emo0001052. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
2
Reach, Receptivity, And Beliefs Associated With the Campaign to Prevent and Reduce Cigarette Use Among Youth in the United States.美国预防和减少青少年吸烟运动的覆盖面、接受度和相关信念。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jun;36(5):789-800. doi: 10.1177/08901171211069991. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
Public Support for Cigarette Pack Pictorial Health Warnings Among US Adults: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey.公众对美国成年人香烟包装图形健康警示的支持:2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查的横断面分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Apr 28;24(6):924-928. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab263.
4
U.S. public opinion toward policy restrictions to limit tobacco product placement and advertising at point-of-sale and on social media.美国公众对限制烟草产品在销售点和社交媒体上的展示和广告的政策的看法。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106930. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106930. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
5
Awareness of Alcohol as a Carcinogen and Support for Alcohol Control Policies.对酒精作为致癌物的认识和对酒精控制政策的支持。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Feb;62(2):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
6
Prevalence and correlates of US adult public opinion on restricting junk food advertising to children on social media: 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey.美国成年人对社交媒体限制向儿童投放垃圾食品广告的意见的流行程度和相关因素:2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Nov;24(16):5534-5538. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003359. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems.政策实施科学促进人群健康:学习卫生政策系统的潜力。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;9:681602. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.681602. eCollection 2021.
8
Reducing mask resistance among White evangelical Christians with value-consistent messages.用价值观一致的信息降低白人福音派基督教徒的口罩抵触情绪。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101723118.
9
"The Tragedy of the Commons": How Individualism and Collectivism Affected the Spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic.《公地悲剧》:个人主义和集体主义如何影响 COVID-19 大流行的传播。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;9:627559. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.627559. eCollection 2021.
10
Policy Implementation Science - An Unexplored Strategy to Address Social Determinants of Health.政策实施科学——解决健康社会决定因素的未探索策略。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jan 21;31(1):133-138. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.1.133. eCollection 2021 Winter.