Qi Dongliang, Zhu Jianqiang, Wang Xiugui
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agriculture Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434025, Hubei, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):61741-61752. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26480-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
Alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD) can reduce non-point source pollution from paddy fields by mitigating field water depth. However, the influence of compounding modes of polymer-coated urea (PCU) and conventional urea (CU) on nitrogen (N) loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields under AWD conditions remains unclear. To address this question, in this study, a 2-year field experiment was set up with three N management treatments: (a) 100% CU (N1), (b) 60% PCU + 40% CU (N2), and (c) 100% PCU (N3), at an equivalent N rate of 240 kg ha that was applied to traditional continuously flooded (CI) and AWD systems. The results of this experiment showed a high-risk period of N loss from the paddy fields within 7 d after basal fertilization and 5 days after tillering fertilization. AWD reduced irrigation frequencies by 3.5 times and total input of irrigation water by 38.1%, increasing water utilization from precipitation by 44.4% than CI and reducing the volume of runoff by 46.1% and leaching water by 22.1%. This reduced the total N (TN) loss through runoff and leaching under AWD. In the N2 and N3 treatment groups, N concentration in floodwater decreased from 33.8 to 24.9%, TN loss via runoff decreased by 35.3 to 25.0%, and leaching decreased by 41.7 to 30.3% from the paddy field compared to N1. With the same N mode, AWD showed a higher N uptake (from jointing to maturity stage) and rice yield compared to CI. Besides, N2 and N3 had higher N uptake compared to N1 under the two irrigation regimes. Moreover, the AWDN3 and AWDN2 treatments resulted in the lowest and second-lowest loss of TN via runoff (2.21 to 2.66 kg ha) and leaching (8.14 and 10.21 kg ha), respectively, from the paddy fields and had the relatively high N uptake in rice in the maturity stage. Remarkably, compared with N3, N2 had a comparable grain yield under CI; however, it showed a higher yield under AWD, suggesting that there is a positive interaction in the rice yield between the AWD and compounding N (PCU + CU) fertilization practice. Thus, AWD coupled with N2 could be recommended as a useful approach to reduce N loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields, which could increase the grain yield of middle-season rice.
干湿交替灌溉(AWD)可通过降低田间水深来减少稻田的面源污染。然而,在AWD条件下,聚合物包膜尿素(PCU)与常规尿素(CU)的配施方式对稻田氮素径流和淋失损失的影响尚不清楚。为解决这一问题,本研究开展了为期两年的田间试验,设置了三种施氮管理处理:(a)100%常规尿素(N1),(b)60% PCU + 40% CU(N2),以及(c)100% PCU(N3),以240 kg ha的等量施氮量施用于传统淹灌(CI)和AWD系统。本试验结果表明,基肥后7天内和分蘖肥后5天内是稻田氮素损失的高风险期。AWD使灌溉频率降低了3.5倍,灌溉水总投入量减少了38.1%,与CI相比,降水水分利用率提高了44.4%,径流量减少了46.1%,淋溶水量减少了22.1%。这减少了AWD条件下通过径流和淋溶造成的总氮(TN)损失。与N1相比,N2和N3处理组中,稻田田面水氮浓度从33.8%降至24.9%,径流氮损失减少了35.3%至25.0%,淋失减少了41.7%至30.3%。在相同施氮模式下,与CI相比,AWD在拔节至成熟期表现出更高的氮素吸收量和水稻产量。此外,在两种灌溉方式下,N2和N3的氮素吸收量均高于N1。而且,AWD-N3和AWD-N2处理导致稻田径流(2.21至2.66 kg ha)和淋溶(8.14和10.21 kg ha)的TN损失分别最低和次低,且成熟期水稻氮素吸收量相对较高。值得注意的是,与N3相比,N2在CI条件下具有相当的籽粒产量;然而,在AWD条件下其产量更高,这表明AWD与配施氮(PCU + CU)施肥措施在水稻产量上存在正相互作用。因此,AWD与N2配施可作为一种减少稻田氮素径流和淋失损失的有效方法,可提高中季稻的籽粒产量。