Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
ISR-Lisboa/LARSyS and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jun 6;184:108545. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108545. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
Effective use of conceptual knowledge engages semantic representation and control processes to access information in a goal-driven manner. Neuropsychological findings of patients presenting either degraded knowledge (e.g., semantic dementia) or disrupted control (e.g., semantic aphasia) converge with neuroimaging evidence from young adults, and delineate the neural segregation of representation and control mechanisms. However, there is still scarce research on the neurofunctional underpinnings of such mechanisms in healthy ageing. To address this, we conducted an fMRI study, wherein young and older adults performed a covert naming task of typical and atypical objects. Three main age-related differences were found. As shown by age group and typicality interactions, older adults exhibited overactivation during naming of atypical (e.g., avocado) relative to typical concepts in brain regions associated to semantic representation, including anterior and medial portions of left temporal lobe (respectively, ATL and MTG). This provides evidence for the reorganization of neural activity in these brain regions contingent to the enrichment of semantic repositories in older ages. The medial orbitofrontal gyrus was also overactivated, indicating that the processing of atypical concepts (relative to typical items) taxes additional control resources in the elderly. Increased activation in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was observed in naming typical items (relative to atypical ones), but only for young adults. This suggests that naming typical items (e.g., strawberry) taxes more on control processes in younger ages, presumably due to the semantic competition set by other items that share multiple features with the target (e.g., raspberry, blackberry, cherry). Together, these results reveal the dynamic nature of semantic control interplaying with conceptual representations as people grow older, by indicating that distinct neural bases uphold semantic performance from young to older ages. These findings may be explained by neural compensation mechanisms coming into play to support neurocognitive changes in healthy ageing.
有效利用概念知识需要语义表示和控制过程,以便以目标驱动的方式访问信息。表现出知识退化(例如语义痴呆)或控制受损(例如语义失语症)的患者的神经心理学发现与来自年轻人的神经影像学证据相吻合,并描绘了表示和控制机制的神经分离。然而,关于健康衰老中此类机制的神经功能基础的研究仍然很少。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项 fMRI 研究,其中年轻和老年成年人执行了典型和非典型物体的隐蔽命名任务。发现了三个主要的与年龄相关的差异。如年龄组和典型性交互作用所示,与典型概念相比,老年人在命名非典型(例如鳄梨)时表现出大脑区域的过度激活,这些大脑区域与语义表示相关,包括左侧颞叶的前部和内侧部分(分别为 ATL 和 MTG)。这为随着年龄的增长,这些大脑区域的神经活动重新组织提供了证据,这是由于语义库的丰富。内侧眶额回也过度激活,表明老年人在处理非典型概念(相对于典型项目)时需要额外的控制资源。在命名典型项目(相对于非典型项目)时,下额叶回(IFG)也观察到激活增加,但仅在年轻成年人中观察到。这表明,在年轻时期,命名典型项目(例如草莓)需要更多的控制过程,大概是由于与目标共享多个特征的其他项目(例如覆盆子,黑莓,樱桃)引起的语义竞争。总的来说,这些结果表明,随着人们年龄的增长,语义控制与概念表示相互作用的动态性质,表明从年轻到老年,不同的神经基础维持语义表现。这些发现可以通过神经补偿机制来解释,这些机制可以发挥作用以支持健康衰老中的神经认知变化。