• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷圈套息肉切除术切除的结直肠高级别异型增生或癌症的处理:一项多中心探索性研究。

Management of colorectal high-grade dysplasia or cancer resected by cold snare polypectomy: a multicenter exploratory study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8, Hatanodai, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, 142-8666, Japan.

Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun;58(6):554-564. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-01980-1. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00535-023-01980-1
PMID:36935473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical course and surveillance strategy for patients who undergo cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer is unclear. We investigated the management of colorectal HGDs and cancers following CSP.

METHODS

This Japanese nationwide multicenter exploratory study was retrospectively conducted on patients who had undergone CSP for colorectal HGDs or cancers and follow-up colonoscopy at least once from 2014 to 2020. We investigated the detection rate of CSP scars, local recurrence rate (LRR), risk factors for local recurrence, and follow-up strategy. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000043670).

RESULTS

We included 155 patients with 156 lesions. CSP scars were identified in 22 (31.4%), 41 (54.7%), and 10 (90.9%) patients with curative, borderline, and non-curative resection, respectively. Among them, residual tumors were observed in one (4.5%), six (14.6%), and three (30.0%) cases, respectively. The total LRR was 13.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.8-23.8). R1 resection cases (either horizontal or vertical margins positive for tumors) were associated with local recurrence (p = 0.031). Salvage endoscopic and surgical resections were performed on 21 and 10 patients, respectively. Among them, the proportion of endoscopically suspected residual tumors was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the residual tumor-positive group (100%) than in the residual tumor-negative group (28.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

LRR after CSP for HGDs or cancers was 13.7% based on scar-identified cases. Salvage endoscopic or surgical resection should be performed according to the curability of the lesion and endoscopic findings during colonoscopic surveillance.

摘要

背景

对于接受冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)治疗高级别异型增生(HGD)或癌症的患者,其临床病程和监测策略尚不清楚。我们调查了 CSP 后结直肠 HGD 和癌症的管理情况。

方法

这是一项在 2014 年至 2020 年期间接受 CSP 治疗结直肠 HGD 或癌症并至少进行一次随访结肠镜检查的日本全国多中心探索性研究。我们调查了 CSP 瘢痕的检出率、局部复发率(LRR)、局部复发的危险因素和随访策略。本研究在大学医院医疗信息网络(UMIN)临床试验注册中心(UMIN000043670)注册。

结果

我们纳入了 155 名患者的 156 处病变。在根治性、交界性和非根治性切除的患者中,分别有 22 例(31.4%)、41 例(54.7%)和 10 例(90.9%)发现 CSP 瘢痕。其中,分别有 1 例(4.5%)、6 例(14.6%)和 3 例(30.0%)患者有残留肿瘤。总的 LRR 为 13.7%(95%置信区间:6.8-23.8)。R1 切除病例(肿瘤的水平或垂直切缘阳性)与局部复发相关(p=0.031)。对 21 例和 10 例患者分别进行了挽救性内镜和手术切除。其中,在残留肿瘤阳性组(100%)中内镜怀疑有残留肿瘤的比例显著高于残留肿瘤阴性组(28.6%)(p<0.001)。

结论

根据瘢痕识别病例,CSP 治疗 HGD 或癌症后的 LRR 为 13.7%。在结肠镜监测期间,应根据病变的可治愈性和内镜检查结果,进行挽救性内镜或手术切除。

相似文献

1
Management of colorectal high-grade dysplasia or cancer resected by cold snare polypectomy: a multicenter exploratory study.冷圈套息肉切除术切除的结直肠高级别异型增生或癌症的处理:一项多中心探索性研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun;58(6):554-564. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-01980-1. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
Cold snare polypectomy for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor: a prospective clinical trial (pilot study).冷圈套息肉切除术治疗非壶腹型十二指肠浅表层上皮性肿瘤:一项前瞻性临床试验(初步研究)。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5217-5223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08899-9. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Recurrence rate and lesions characteristics after cold snare polypectomy of high-grade dysplasia and T1 lesions: A multicenter analysis.高级别异型增生和 T1 病变冷圈套息肉切除术后的复发率和病变特征:一项多中心分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3337-3344. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15625. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠息肉后局部复发及其危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2918-2925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07072-7. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Endoscopic features and clinical course of colorectal carcinoma resected by cold snare polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术切除的结直肠癌的内镜特征和临床过程。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;38(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16145. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Cold snare polypectomy vs. hot snare polypectomy vs. argon plasma coagulation for small (5-9mm) left-sided colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与热圈套息肉切除术和氩等离子体凝固术治疗左侧结直肠小息肉(5-9mm):一项前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(1S Suppl 1):e909-e915. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002300.
8
Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: A meta-analysis.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;34(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14464. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow-up is needed: a single-centre retrospective study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大型无蒂锯齿状病变是安全的,但需要随访:一项单中心回顾性研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Apr;9(3):370-377. doi: 10.1177/2050640620964641. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
Residual adenoma after cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal adenomas: a prospective clinical study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小结直肠腺瘤后残留腺瘤:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jul;50(7):693-700. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124869. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the accuracy of preoperative endoscopic localization for colorectal cancer: post hoc analysis of a prospective study.评估结直肠癌术前内镜定位的准确性:一项前瞻性研究的事后分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11871-6.
2
Verification of the increase in concomitant dysplasia and cancer with the size of sessile serrated lesions.伴发发育异常和癌症的发生率随无蒂锯齿状病变大小增加的验证。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 28;12(3):E448-E455. doi: 10.1055/a-2246-0820. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大小结直肠息肉的不完全切除率比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines.结肠镜筛查和监测指南。
Dig Endosc. 2021 May;33(4):486-519. doi: 10.1111/den.13972.
3
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.结直肠息肉管理的循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;56(4):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01776-1. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
4
Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for local residual/recurrent colorectal tumor after endoscopic resection: Large multicenter 10-year study.内镜黏膜下剥离术挽救内镜切除后局部残留/复发结直肠肿瘤: 10 年多中心大型研究。
Dig Endosc. 2021 May;33(4):608-615. doi: 10.1111/den.13797. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Case of Colorectal Cancer After Cold Snare Polypectomy Successfully Salvaged on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.冷圈套息肉切除术后发生的结直肠癌经内镜黏膜下剥离术成功挽救的病例
Cureus. 2020 Oct 26;12(10):e11182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11182.
6
Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1- to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.1-20mm 结直肠息肉不完全切除率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):904-914.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions-Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组关于内镜下切除结直肠病变的建议
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):486-519. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.029. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
8
Endoscopic prediction of advanced histology in colorectal lesions sized <10 mm using the Japan Narrow-band imaging Expert Team classification.使用日本窄带成像专家组分类法对直径<10毫米的大肠病变进行高级组织学的内镜预测。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):785-790. doi: 10.1111/den.13566. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
9
Does cold snare polypectomy completely resect the mucosal layer? A prospective single-center observational trial.冷圈套息肉切除术能否完全切除黏膜层?一项前瞻性单中心观察性试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;35(2):241-248. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14824. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
10
Objective validity of the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification system for the differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps.日本窄带成像专家团队分类系统对结直肠息肉鉴别诊断的客观有效性。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Sep;31(5):544-551. doi: 10.1111/den.13393. Epub 2019 May 7.