• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥昏迷量表与气管插管在预测重症监护病房患者死亡率中的相关性

Association of Glasgow coma scale and endotracheal intubation in predicting mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

作者信息

Moghaddam Nader Markazi, Fathi Mohammad, Jame Sanaz Zargar Balaye, Darvishi Mohammad, Mortazavi Morteza

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Economics, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Critical Care Quality Improvement Research Center, Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Acute Crit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):113-121. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00927. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

DOI:10.4266/acc.2022.00927
PMID:36935540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10030249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assessed predictors of mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) and investigated if Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is associated with mortality in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (EI).

METHODS

From February 2020, we performed a 1-year study on 2,055 adult patients admitted to the ICU of two teaching hospitals. The outcome was mortality during ICU stay and the predictors were patients' demographic, clinical, and laboratory features.

RESULTS

EI was associated with a decreased risk for mortality compared with similar patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.32; P=0.030). This shows that EI had been performed correctly with proper indications. Increasing age (AOR, 1.04; P<0.001) or blood pressure (AOR, 1.01; P<0.001), respiratory problems (AOR, 3.24; P<0.001), nosocomial infection (AOR, 1.64; P=0.014), diabetes (AOR, 5.69; P<0.001), history of myocardial infarction (AOR, 2.52; P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AOR, 3.93; P<0.001), immunosuppression (AOR, 3.15; P<0.001), and the use of anesthetics/sedatives/hypnotics for reasons other than EI (AOR, 4.60; P<0.001) were directly; and GCS (AOR, 0.84; P<0.001) was inversely related to mortality. In patients with trauma surgeries (AOR, 0.62; P=0.014) or other surgical categories (AOR, 0.61; P=0.024) undergoing EI, GCS had an inverse relation with mortality (accuracy=82.6%, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve=0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of features affected the risk for mortality in patients admitted to the ICU. Considering GCS score for EI had the potential of affecting prognosis in subgroups of patients such as those with trauma surgeries or other surgical categories.

摘要

背景

我们评估了重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率预测因素,并调查了格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)与接受气管插管(EI)患者死亡率之间的关系。

方法

自2020年2月起,我们对两家教学医院ICU收治的2055例成年患者进行了为期1年的研究。观察指标为ICU住院期间的死亡率,预测因素为患者的人口统计学、临床和实验室特征。

结果

与相似患者相比,EI与死亡率风险降低相关(调整优势比[AOR],0.32;P = 0.030)。这表明EI的实施指征正确。年龄增加(AOR,1.04;P < 0.001)、血压升高(AOR,1.01;P < 0.001)、呼吸问题(AOR,3.24;P < 0.001)、医院感染(AOR,1.64;P = 0.014)、糖尿病(AOR,5.69;P < 0.001)、心肌梗死病史(AOR,2.52;P < 0.001)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AOR,3.93;P < 0.001)、免疫抑制(AOR,3.15;P < 0.001)以及因EI以外原因使用麻醉药/镇静药/催眠药(AOR,4.60;P < 0.001)与死亡率直接相关;而GCS(AOR,0.84;P < 0.001)与死亡率呈负相关。在接受EI的创伤手术患者(AOR,0.62;P = 0.014)或其他手术类型患者(AOR,0.61;P = 0.024)中,GCS与死亡率呈负相关(准确率 = 82.6%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积 = 0.81)。

结论

多种特征影响ICU收治患者的死亡风险。考虑EI时的GCS评分可能会影响创伤手术或其他手术类型等亚组患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/3672603e6b8f/acc-2022-00927f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/6f1a65f948dc/acc-2022-00927f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/d073243fad9c/acc-2022-00927f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/3672603e6b8f/acc-2022-00927f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/6f1a65f948dc/acc-2022-00927f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/d073243fad9c/acc-2022-00927f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b079/10030249/3672603e6b8f/acc-2022-00927f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Glasgow coma scale and endotracheal intubation in predicting mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit.格拉斯哥昏迷量表与气管插管在预测重症监护病房患者死亡率中的相关性
Acute Crit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):113-121. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00927. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
The FOUR score predicts mortality, endotracheal intubation and ICU length of stay after traumatic brain injury.FOUR评分可预测创伤性脑损伤后的死亡率、气管插管情况及重症监护病房住院时间。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(3):496-504. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9995-6.
3
Prognostication of traumatic brain injury outcomes in older trauma patients: A novel risk assessment tool based on initial cranial CT findings.老年创伤患者创伤性脑损伤预后的预测:一种基于初始头颅CT表现的新型风险评估工具。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jan-Mar;7(1):23-31. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_2_17.
4
Glasgow Coma Scale score in the evaluation of outcome in the intensive care unit: findings from the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III study.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在重症监护病房预后评估中的应用:急性生理与慢性健康状况评估III研究的结果
Crit Care Med. 1993 Oct;21(10):1459-65. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199310000-00012.
5
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
6
The association between field Glasgow Coma Scale score and outcome in patients undergoing paramedic rapid sequence intubation.接受护理人员快速顺序插管患者的现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与预后的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.012.
7
Intensive care unit morbidity and mortality from eclampsia: an evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and the Glasgow Coma Scale score.子痫所致重症监护病房的发病率和死亡率:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的评估
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;28(1):120-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00020.
8
Comparison of Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Revised Trauma Score in Predicting the Mortality and Prolonged ICU Stay of Traumatic Young Children: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.损伤严重度评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和改良创伤评分在预测创伤性幼儿死亡率及重症监护病房长期住院情况中的比较:一项横断面回顾性研究
Emerg Med Int. 2019 Dec 1;2019:5453624. doi: 10.1155/2019/5453624. eCollection 2019.
9
Survival and functional outcome of children requiring endotracheal intubation during therapy for severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤治疗期间需要气管插管的儿童的生存情况和功能转归
Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1396-401. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00030.
10
Questioning dogma: does a GCS of 8 require intubation?质疑教条:格拉斯哥昏迷评分 8 分是否需要插管?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):2073-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01383-4. Epub 2020 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Airway management and functional outcomes in intubated patients with ischemic stroke.缺血性中风插管患者的气道管理与功能转归
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85489-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Early endotracheal intubation improves neurological outcome following witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: a population-based observational study.在日本,早期气管插管可改善院外心脏骤停患者的神经学预后:一项基于人群的观察性研究。
Acute Med Surg. 2021 May 1;8(1):e650. doi: 10.1002/ams2.650. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Factors associated with death due to trauma in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed dilated pupils.格拉斯哥昏迷评分 3 分且双侧瞳孔固定散大的创伤患者死亡的相关因素。
Emergencias. 2021;33(2):121-127.
3
Decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score in medical patients as an indicator for intubation in the Emergency Department: Why are we doing it?
内科患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分降低作为急诊科插管的指标:我们为何要这样做?
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Mar 8;76:e2282. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2282. eCollection 2021.
4
Isolated traumatic brain injury: Routine intubation for Glasgow Coma Scale 7 or 8 may be harmful!单纯性创伤性脑损伤:格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 7 或 8 分的患者常规插管可能有害!
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):874-879. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003123.
5
Intensive Care Unit Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.重症监护病房风险评估:一项系统综述
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Aug;49(8):1422-1431. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i8.3865.
6
Questioning dogma: does a GCS of 8 require intubation?质疑教条:格拉斯哥昏迷评分 8 分是否需要插管?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):2073-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01383-4. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale scores on unplanned intensive care unit readmissions among surgical patients.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分对手术患者非计划重症监护病房再入院的影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct;7(20):520. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.06.
8
Risk prediction models for intensive care unit readmission: A systematic review of methodology and applicability.重症监护病房再入院风险预测模型:方法学和适用性的系统评价。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jul;33(4):367-374. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
Trauma patients with prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale less than nine: not a homogenous group.创伤患者的院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于 9 分:并非同质群体。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):873-878. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01139-9. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Advanced airway management during adult cardiac arrest: A systematic review.成人心脏骤停时的高级气道管理:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 11.