• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者的院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于 9 分:并非同质群体。

Trauma patients with prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale less than nine: not a homogenous group.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):873-878. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01139-9. Epub 2019 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-019-01139-9
PMID:31062034
Abstract

PURPOSE

Prehospital guidelines stratify and manage patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than nine and any sign of head injury as affected by severe traumatic brain injury (STBI). We hypothesized that this group of patients is so inhomogeneous that uniform treatment guidelines cannot be advocated.

METHODS

Patients (2005-2012) with prehospital GCS below nine and abbreviated injury scale head and neck above two were identified from trauma registry. Patients with acute lethal injuries, isolated neck injuries, extubated within 24 h or transferred interhospitally were excluded. Patients were dichotomized based on the worst prehospital GCS (recorded before sedatives) into two groups: GCS 3-5 and GCS 6-8. These were statistically compared using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The GCS 3-5 group (99 patients) when compared with the GCS 6-8 group (49 patients) had shorter prehospital times (63 vs. 79 min; p < 0.05), more frequent episodes of both hypoxia (30.3% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.05) and hypotension (26.7% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.05), more often required craniectomy (15.1% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.05) and higher mortality (33.3% vs. 2%; p < 0.05). In the GCS 3-5 group, prehospital endotracheal intubation was attempted more often (57.5% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.05) and was more often successful (39.3% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.05). Length of stay in ICU did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

STBI patients are fundamentally different based on whether their initial GCS falls into 3-5 or 6-8 category. Recommendations from trials investigating trauma patients with GCS less than nine as one group should be translated with caution to clinical practice.

摘要

目的

院前指南对格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分小于 9 分且有任何头部受伤迹象的患者进行分层和管理,这些患者受严重创伤性脑损伤(STBI)的影响。我们假设这组患者非常不同,因此不能提倡统一的治疗指南。

方法

从创伤登记处确定院前 GCS 评分低于 9 分且损伤严重程度评分头颈部大于 2 的患者。排除有急性致命性损伤、单纯颈部损伤、24 小时内拔管或院内转科的患者。根据院前记录的最差 GCS(镇静前),将患者分为两组:GCS 3-5 组和 GCS 6-8 组。使用单变量分析对两组进行统计学比较。

结果

与 GCS 6-8 组(49 例)相比,GCS 3-5 组(99 例)的院前时间更短(63 分钟 vs. 79 分钟;p<0.05),缺氧(30.3% vs. 7.7%;p<0.05)和低血压(26.7% vs. 6.4%;p<0.05)的发作更频繁,更常需要开颅术(15.1% vs. 4.0%;p=0.05),死亡率更高(33.3% vs. 2%;p<0.05)。在 GCS 3-5 组中,院前气管插管的尝试更频繁(57.5% vs. 28.6%,p<0.05),成功率更高(39.3% vs. 10.2%;p=0.05)。ICU 住院时间无差异。

结论

根据初始 GCS 是否落入 3-5 或 6-8 类别,STBI 患者存在根本差异。从临床试验中获得的针对 GCS 评分低于 9 分的创伤患者的建议,应谨慎转化为临床实践。

相似文献

1
Trauma patients with prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale less than nine: not a homogenous group.创伤患者的院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分小于 9 分:并非同质群体。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):873-878. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01139-9. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
The association between field Glasgow Coma Scale score and outcome in patients undergoing paramedic rapid sequence intubation.接受护理人员快速顺序插管患者的现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与预后的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.012.
3
Prehospital intubation for isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injury: worse outcomes and higher mortality.单纯严重钝性创伤性脑损伤的院前气管插管:预后更差且死亡率更高。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0718-x. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
4
A tale of two cities: prehospital intubation with or without paralysing agents for traumatic brain injury.双城故事:创伤性脑损伤患者院前插管使用或不使用麻痹剂的情况
ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):455-459. doi: 10.1111/ans.14479. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(mGCS)的运动成分与院前总格拉斯哥昏迷量表(tGCS)的比较,作为创伤患者的院前风险调整措施。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844870.
6
Observed versus expected mortality in pediatric patients intubated in the field with Glasgow Coma Scale scores < 9.现场格拉斯哥昏迷评分 < 9 的小儿患者插管的观察死亡率与预期死亡率。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct;45(5):769-776. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-01065-2. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
7
Should trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 be intubated prior to hospital arrival?创伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 3 分,在送达医院前是否应插管?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):541-6. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008736.
8
Is prehospital endotracheal intubation associated with improved outcomes in isolated severe head injury? A matched cohort analysis.院前气管插管是否与单纯严重颅脑损伤的转归改善相关?一项配对队列分析。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Feb;29(1):32-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008947. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
9
Prehospital on-scene anaesthetist treating severe traumatic brain injury patients is associated with lower mortality and better neurological outcome.现场预诊麻醉师治疗严重创伤性脑损伤患者与较低的死亡率和更好的神经预后相关。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 28;27(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0590-x.
10
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Settlement Is at the End-Common Trauma Scores Require a Critical Reassessment Due to the Possible Dynamics of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Patients' Clinical Course.由于患者临床病程中创伤性脑损伤可能存在动态变化,结局评估需对常用创伤评分进行批判性重新评估。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 5;13(11):3333. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113333.
2
Long-term outcome of traumatic brain injury patients with initial GCS of 3-5.初始格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为3 - 5分的创伤性脑损伤患者的长期预后
World Neurosurg X. 2024 Mar 8;23:100361. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100361. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Association of Glasgow coma scale and endotracheal intubation in predicting mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
格拉斯哥昏迷量表与气管插管在预测重症监护病房患者死亡率中的相关性
Acute Crit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):113-121. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00927. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
4
The most critically injured polytrauma patient mortality: should it be a measurement of trauma system performance?多发伤重伤患者死亡率:是否应作为创伤体系效能的衡量指标?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Feb;50(1):115-119. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02073-z. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
5
25-Year experience with adult polytraumatized patients in a European level 1 trauma center: polytrauma between 1995 and 2019. What has changed? A retrospective cohort study.25 年欧洲 1 级创伤中心成人多发伤患者经验:1995 年至 2019 年多发伤。有何变化?一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2409-2415. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04433-1. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
6
Reply to the letter: "Unreliable claims regarding bicycle helmet law in Western Australia".对信件《关于西澳大利亚州自行车头盔法的不可靠说法》的回复。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Dec;163(12):3243-3245. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04944-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
Acute DNA Methylation Trajectories in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Associations With Outcomes Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults.成人严重创伤性脑损伤后脑脊液中急性 DNA 甲基化轨迹及其与结局的关系。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Sep;35(9):790-800. doi: 10.1177/15459683211028245. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
8
Identification of Serious Adverse Events in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries, from Prehospital Care to Intensive-Care Unit, Using Early Warning Scores.使用早期预警评分识别创伤性脑损伤患者从院前急救到重症监护病房的严重不良事件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051504.