Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 2;14:1145820. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1145820. eCollection 2023.
To explore the advantages and disadvantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy.
A total of 101 patients with adrenal tumors who received retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) (n=75) or robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RARLA) (n=26) in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative indicators were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
We found that blood loss in the RARLA group was significantly less than that in the RLA group (66.9 ± 35.5 ml vs 91.5 ± 66.1 ml, = 0.020). Gastrointestinal function recovery time in RARLA group was significantly less than that in RLA group (19.9 ± 6.9 hours vs 32.0 ± 9.0 hours, < 0.001). However, the operation time, drainage tube placement time, post-operative hospital stay in the RARLA group were significantly longer compared with the RLA group (149.6 ± 53.4 mins vs 118.7 ± 41.2 mins, = 0.003; 4.9 ± 2.0 days vs 3.6 ± 1.1 days, = 0.004; 6.4 ± 1.8 days vs 4.6 ± 1.6 days, < 0.001). The hospitalization expense in the RARLA group is significantly higher than that in the RLA group (59284 ± 8724 RMB¥ vs 39785 ± 10126 RMB¥, < 0.001). We found that there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the pathological types of the two groups were significantly different. Patients in the RLA group had a higher proportion of adrenocortical adenoma, while patients in the RARLA group had a higher proportion of pheochromocytoma.
Compared with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and accelerate postoperative gastrointestinal recovery. It is committed to studying how to reduce the hospitalization time and hospitalization cost of RARLA, which can make RARLA more widely used.
探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的优缺点。
回顾性收集 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月我院收治的 101 例肾上腺肿瘤患者,分别接受后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(RLA)(n=75)或机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(RARLA)(n=26)。比较患者的一般资料、肿瘤特征和围手术期指标。使用 t 检验比较连续变量,使用 Pearson 卡方检验或 Fisher 确切概率法比较分类变量。
我们发现 RARLA 组的术中出血量明显少于 RLA 组(66.9 ± 35.5ml 比 91.5 ± 66.1ml, = 0.020)。RARLA 组的胃肠功能恢复时间明显短于 RLA 组(19.9 ± 6.9 小时比 32.0 ± 9.0 小时, < 0.001)。然而,RARLA 组的手术时间、引流管放置时间、术后住院时间明显长于 RLA 组(149.6 ± 53.4 分钟比 118.7 ± 41.2 分钟, = 0.003;4.9 ± 2.0 天比 3.6 ± 1.1 天, = 0.004;6.4 ± 1.8 天比 4.6 ± 1.6 天, < 0.001)。RARLA 组的住院费用明显高于 RLA 组(59284 ± 8724 元比 39785 ± 10126 元, < 0.001)。我们发现两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异。然而,两组的病理类型有显著差异。RLA 组患者中肾上腺皮质腺瘤的比例较高,而 RARLA 组患者中嗜铬细胞瘤的比例较高。
与传统腹腔镜肾上腺切除术相比,机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术可明显减少术中出血量,加速术后胃肠功能恢复。致力于研究如何降低 RARLA 的住院时间和住院费用,使 RARLA 更广泛地应用。