Hoeksema Bernd
Faculty of Philosophy Theology and Religious Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
iHub: Radboud's Interdisciplinary Research Hub On Digitalization and Society, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Philos Technol. 2023;36(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s13347-023-00618-7. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
In this paper, I approach the power of digital platforms by using the republican concept of domination. More specifically, I argue that the traditional, agent-relative interpretation of domination, in the case of digital domination, is best supplemented by a more radical version, on which republicans ought to give priority to structural elements. I show how radical republicanism draws attention to (1) the economic rationales and the socio-technical infrastructures that underlie and support digital platforms and to (2) the forms of influence that are directed at cognitive dimensions, such as habituation and routinisation, which are particularly relevant for the power of digital platforms. These insights also imply that republicans have reason to favour a more structural response to digital platforms over more direct and individualised forms of control that fit with a 'standard' republican approach, such as securing exit options and requiring user consent.
在本文中,我通过运用共和主义的支配概念来探讨数字平台的力量。更具体地说,我认为,在数字支配的情况下,传统的、相对于主体的支配解释,最好由一个更激进的版本来补充,在这个版本中,共和主义者应该优先考虑结构要素。我展示了激进共和主义如何将注意力引向:(1)作为数字平台基础并支撑其运行的经济原理和社会技术基础设施,以及(2)针对认知层面的影响形式,如习惯化和常规化,这些对于数字平台的力量尤为重要。这些见解还意味着,相较于符合“标准”共和主义方法的更直接、个性化的控制形式,如确保退出选项和要求用户同意,共和主义者有理由倾向于对数字平台采取更具结构性的应对措施。