Balsiger Philip, Jammet Thomas, Cianferoni Nicola, Surdez Muriel
University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
School of Social Work Fribourg, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), and University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Compet Change. 2023 Jan;27(1):163-183. doi: 10.1177/10245294211055612. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
How do organizations in a sector where powerful platforms have emerged cope with the new constraints and opportunities that platforms induce? A growing number of studies highlight the power of digital platforms to re-organize markets and thereby create new forms of dependence. But there are also indications that organizations are capable of countering platform power especially by demanding their regulation. This paper expands this view to investigate also strategies at the organizational level. It draws on the algorithmic game studies of strategic responses to environmental changes to study how organizations strategically respond to the rise of digital platforms. To show organizations' capacities to cope with the new digital market environment, we use a qualitative case study of the Swiss hotel sector and its reactions to so-called online travel agencies, based on interviews with hotel managers and professional representatives. We distinguish between three types of hotels-small family-run, luxury, and chain hotels, and identify three types of strategic responses: bypassing, optimizing, and mitigating. Contrary to a platform power perspective, we find some evidence for organizations' capacity to keep platforms at bay, by limiting dependence through mitigation, and platforms' reach through bypassing. Hotels also learn to "play the algorithmic game" and take advantage of platforms' technological affordances, but such strategies seem to accommodate platform power rather than countering it. Finally, we find that hotels with fewer resources (small family-run hotels) are less equipped to counter platform power, suggesting that platforms risk fostering existing hierarchies and segmentation in markets.
在一个已经出现强大平台的行业中,各组织如何应对平台带来的新约束和新机遇?越来越多的研究强调了数字平台重新组织市场并由此创造新形式依赖关系的力量。但也有迹象表明,各组织有能力对抗平台的力量,尤其是通过要求对其进行监管。本文拓展了这一观点,还研究了组织层面的策略。它借鉴了关于对环境变化的战略回应的算法博弈研究,来探讨各组织如何对数字平台的崛起做出战略回应。为了展示各组织应对新数字市场环境的能力,我们基于对酒店经理和专业代表的访谈,对瑞士酒店业及其对所谓在线旅行社的反应进行了定性案例研究。我们区分了三种类型的酒店——小型家庭经营酒店、豪华酒店和连锁酒店,并确定了三种战略回应类型:绕过、优化和减轻。与平台权力观点相反,我们发现有一些证据表明各组织有能力通过减轻依赖来避免受平台影响,并通过绕过平台来限制其影响力。酒店也学会了“玩算法博弈”并利用平台的技术能力,但这些策略似乎是在顺应平台权力而非对抗它。最后,我们发现资源较少的酒店(小型家庭经营酒店)应对平台权力的能力较弱,这表明平台有加剧市场中现有等级制度和分割的风险。