Knepp Bodie, Ander Bradley P, Jickling Glen C, Hull Heather, Yee Alan H, Ng Kwan, Rodriguez Fernando, Carmona-Mora Paulina, Amini Hajar, Zhan Xinhua, Hakoupian Marisa, Alomar Noor, Sharp Frank R, Stamova Boryana
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Brain Hemorrhages. 2022 Dec;3(4):155-176. doi: 10.1016/j.hest.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
The peripheral immune system response to Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) may differ with ICH in different brain locations. Thus, we investigated peripheral blood mRNA expression of Deep ICH, Lobar ICH, and vascular risk factor-matched control subjects (n = 59). Deep ICH subjects usually had hypertension. Some Lobar ICH subjects had cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Genes and gene networks in Deep ICH and Lobar ICH were compared to controls. We found 774 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 2 co-expressed gene modules associated with Deep ICH, and 441 DEGs and 5 modules associated with Lobar ICH. Pathway enrichment showed some common immune/inflammatory responses between locations including Autophagy, T Cell Receptor, Inflammasome, and Neuroinflammation Signaling. Th2, Interferon, GP6, and BEX2 Signaling were unique to Deep ICH. Necroptosis Signaling, Protein Ubiquitination, Amyloid Processing, and various RNA Processing terms were unique to Lobar ICH. Finding amyloid processing pathways in blood of Lobar ICH patients suggests peripheral immune cells may participate in processes leading to perivascular/vascular amyloid in CAA vessels and/or are involved in its removal. This study identifies distinct peripheral blood transcriptome architectures in Deep and Lobar ICH, emphasizes the need for considering location in ICH studies/clinical trials, and presents potential location-specific treatment targets.
外周免疫系统对脑出血(ICH)的反应可能因脑出血发生在不同脑区而有所不同。因此,我们研究了深部脑出血、脑叶脑出血患者以及血管危险因素匹配的对照受试者(n = 59)的外周血mRNA表达。深部脑出血患者通常患有高血压。一些脑叶脑出血患者患有脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)。将深部脑出血和脑叶脑出血患者的基因及基因网络与对照组进行比较。我们发现与深部脑出血相关的774个差异表达基因(DEG)和2个共表达基因模块,以及与脑叶脑出血相关的441个DEG和5个模块。通路富集分析显示不同脑区之间存在一些共同的免疫/炎症反应,包括自噬、T细胞受体、炎性小体和神经炎症信号通路。Th2、干扰素、GP6和BEX2信号通路是深部脑出血所特有的。坏死性凋亡信号通路、蛋白质泛素化、淀粉样蛋白加工以及各种RNA加工相关术语是脑叶脑出血所特有的。在脑叶脑出血患者血液中发现淀粉样蛋白加工通路表明外周免疫细胞可能参与导致CAA血管周围/血管淀粉样蛋白形成的过程和/或参与其清除。本研究确定了深部和脑叶脑出血在外周血转录组结构上的差异,强调了在脑出血研究/临床试验中考虑出血部位的必要性,并提出了潜在的部位特异性治疗靶点。