Berlin Nicholas L, Chopra Zoey, Bryant Arrice, Agius Josh, Singh Simone R, Chhabra Karan R, Schulz Paul, West Brady T, Ryan Andrew M, Kullgren Jeffrey T
National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Surg Open. 2022 May 3;3(2):e162. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000162. eCollection 2022 Jun.
To estimate the nationwide prevalence of individualized out-of-pocket (OOP) price estimators at US hospitals, characterize patterns of inclusion of 14 specified "shoppable" surgical procedures, and determine hospital-level characteristics associated with estimators that include surgical procedures.
Price transparency for shoppable surgical services is a key requirement of several recent federal policies, yet the extent to which hospitals provide online OOP price estimators remains unknown.
We reviewed a stratified random sample of 485 U.S. hospitals for the presence of a tool to allow patients to estimate individualized OOP expenses for healthcare services. We compared characteristics of hospitals that did and did not offer online price estimators and performed multivariable modeling to identify facility-level predictors of hospitals offering price estimator with and without surgical procedures.
Nearly two-thirds (66.0%) of hospitals in the final sample (95% confidence interval 61.6%-70.1%) offered an online tool for estimating OOP healthcare expenses. Approximately 58.5% of hospitals included at least one shoppable surgical procedure while around 6.6% of hospitals included all 14 surgical procedures. The most common price reported was laparoscopic cholecystectomy (55.1%), and the least common was recurrent cataract removal (20.0%). Inclusion of surgical procedures varied by total annual surgical volume and health system membership. Only 26.9% of estimators explicitly included professional fees.
Our findings highlight an ongoing progress in price transparency, as well as key areas for improvement in future policies to help patients make more financially informed decisions about their surgical care.
为估算美国医院个性化自付费用(OOP)价格估算器的全国普及率,描述14种特定“可比较价格”外科手术的纳入模式,并确定与包含外科手术的估算器相关的医院层面特征。
可比较价格的外科手术服务的价格透明度是近期多项联邦政策的一项关键要求,但医院提供在线OOP价格估算器的程度仍不明确。
我们对485家美国医院的分层随机样本进行了审查,以确定是否存在一种工具,使患者能够估算医疗服务的个性化OOP费用。我们比较了提供和未提供在线价格估算器的医院的特征,并进行多变量建模,以确定提供有和没有外科手术的价格估算器的医院的机构层面预测因素。
最终样本中近三分之二(66.0%)的医院(95%置信区间61.6%-70.1%)提供了用于估算OOP医疗费用的在线工具。约58.5%的医院纳入了至少一种可比较价格的外科手术,而约6.6%的医院纳入了全部14种外科手术。报告的最常见价格是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(55.1%),最不常见的是复发性白内障摘除术(20.0%)。外科手术的纳入情况因年度总手术量和医疗系统成员身份而异。只有26.9%的估算器明确包括专业费用。
我们的研究结果突出了价格透明度方面的持续进展,以及未来政策中需要改进的关键领域,以帮助患者在手术护理方面做出更明智的财务决策。