Nilsen Christian, Graae Jensen Per, Gundersen Morten, Utheim Øygunn A, Gjerdrum Bjørn, Gundersen Kjell Gunnar, Jahanlu David, Potvin Rick
iFocus Øyeklinikk, Haugesund, Norway.
The Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic, Oslo, Norway.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 11;17:829-835. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S402556. eCollection 2023.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity differences in relation to dry eye symptoms and other non-osmolar signs of dry eye disease.
One hundred ninety one participants who attended a larger interventional study of dry eye disease prior to and after cataract surgery were analyzed for dry eye disease (DED). Dry eye diagnostics were performed for all subjects according to the DEWS II criteria: tear osmolarity was collected from both eyes with the TearLab system, non-invasive Tear film break up time (NIKBUT) was obtained on the test eye with Keratograph and ocular surface staining (OSS) was evaluated using the Oxford schema. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess symptoms. Inter-eye osmolarity greater than 8, which is considered as a sign of DED according to the TearLab user manual, was evaluated and compared with other non-osmolar signs of DED.
The 191 subjects were divided into three groups according to osmolarity measurements. Sixty-five subjects had normal osmolarity (below 308 mOsmol/L in both eyes and less than 9 mOsmol/L difference between the eyes), 107 had high osmolarity (308 mOsmol/L or higher in one of the eyes) and 19 had an inter-eye difference >8 mOsmol/L or higher, with neither eye having osmolarity higher than 307 mOsmol/L. Signs and symptoms in this last group were not correlated with the high osmolarity group or the normal group, though they appeared more similar to the normal group.
The diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity difference in predicting symptoms or other non-osmolar signs of dry eyes appears weak. Our study suggests that the criterion of an inter-eye difference of 8 mOsmol/L is not a useful cut-off for diagnosing dry eyes based on osmolarity.
本研究旨在评估双眼渗透压差异对干眼症症状及干眼症其他非渗透压体征的诊断价值。
对191名曾参与白内障手术前后干眼症大型干预性研究的参与者进行干眼症分析。根据DEWS II标准对所有受试者进行干眼症诊断:使用TearLab系统采集双眼的泪液渗透压,使用角膜地形图仪在受试眼上获取非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIKBUT),并使用牛津模式评估眼表染色(OSS)。使用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷评估症状。评估双眼渗透压差值大于8(根据TearLab用户手册,这被视为干眼症的一个体征),并与干眼症的其他非渗透压体征进行比较。
根据渗透压测量结果,191名受试者被分为三组。65名受试者渗透压正常(双眼均低于308 mOsmol/L,且双眼差值小于9 mOsmol/L),107名受试者渗透压高(一只眼睛为308 mOsmol/L或更高),19名受试者双眼差值>8 mOsmol/L或更高,且双眼渗透压均不高于307 mOsmol/L。最后一组的体征和症状与高渗透压组或正常组均无相关性,尽管它们看起来与正常组更相似。
双眼渗透压差异对预测干眼症症状或其他非渗透压体征的诊断价值似乎较弱。我们的研究表明,8 mOsmol/L的双眼差值标准并非基于渗透压诊断干眼症的有用切点。