• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钛弹性钉与锁定钢板治疗小儿股骨转子下骨折的系统评价与Meta分析

Titanium elastic nails vs locking plate in pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Yaqiang, Xue Yun, Zhao Maosheng, Chen Xianxia, Gao Qiuming

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The 940th Hosptial of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Gansu, China.

Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2023 Mar 3;11:1114265. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1114265. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2023.1114265
PMID:36937961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10020654/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Titanium elastic nails (TENs) and locking plates (LPs) are currently the main internal fixation for treating pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures, and the optimal choice of internal fixation is controversial. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TENs and LPs in treating subtrochanteric fractures in children to provide a theoretical basis and reference for clinical treatment.

METHODS

The literature related to TENs and LPs for treating subtrochanteric fractures in children was searched using the CNKI, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, and the search time frame was from the establishment of the database to October 2022. Two evaluators screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted relevant data. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata14.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with 407 patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures were included in the final screening, including 210 cases with TENs and 197 cases with LPs. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the locking plate, TEN had a shorter operative time [WMD = -1.3, 95%CI(-1.94,-0.66), < 0.01], less intraoperative bleeding [WMD = -84.45, 95%CI(-111.09, -57.82), < 0.01], shorter fracture healing time [WMD = -1.3, 95%CI(-1.94,-0.66), < 0.01], shorter hospital stays [WMD = -2.80, 95% CI(-4.63,-0.98), < 0.01], and earlier full weight bearing [SMD = -0.48, 95% CI(-0.91,-0.04), < 0.05] but more intraoperative fluoroscopy [WMD = 28.23, 95% CI(15.22,41.25), < 0.05]. The overall complication rate was high [OR = 3.52, 95% CI(1.96,6.34), < 0.05], and the postoperative period was prone to angulation, rotation, and inversion deformity [OR = 3.68, 95% CI(1.40, 9.68),  < 0.05]. No significant difference in the incidence of lower limb inequality between the two types of internal fixation [OR = 0.83, 95% CI(0.38, 1.85),  > 0.05] and no significant difference in the Harris score of the hip at the last follow-up between the two types of internal fixation [WMD = -0.67, 95% CI(-2.01,0.67),  > 0.05] were found.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to LPs, TENs have a shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and a shorter fracture healing time, and the child can be fully weight-bearing earlier. Locking plates can reduce the operator's x-ray exposure, and the incidence rate of postoperative angulation, rotation, and inversion deformity is low. Therefore, TENs and LPs are the best internal fixation methods for treating subtrochanteric fractures in children.

摘要

目的

钛弹性髓内钉(TENs)和锁定钢板(LPs)是目前治疗小儿股骨转子下骨折的主要内固定方式,内固定的最佳选择存在争议。本研究旨在系统评价TENs和LPs治疗儿童股骨转子下骨折的有效性和安全性,为临床治疗提供理论依据和参考。

方法

通过中国知网、PubMed、Cochrane、Embase及Web of Science检索与TENs和LPs治疗儿童股骨转子下骨折相关的文献,检索时间范围为各数据库建库至2022年10月。两名评价者根据纳入和排除标准筛选文献并提取相关数据。采用Stata14.0软件进行Meta分析。

结果

最终筛选出9项研究,共407例股骨转子下骨折患儿,其中TENs组210例,LPs组197例。Meta分析结果显示,与锁定钢板相比,TEN手术时间更短[加权均数差(WMD)=-1.3,95%可信区间(CI)(-1.94,-0.66),P<0.01],术中出血量更少[WMD=-84.45,95%CI(-111.09,-57.82),P<0.01],骨折愈合时间更短[WMD=-1.3,95%CI(-1.94,-0.66),P<0.01],住院时间更短[WMD=-2.80,95%CI(-4.63,-0.98),P<0.01],完全负重时间更早[标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.48,95%CI(-0.91,-0.04),P<0.05],但术中透视次数更多[WMD=28.23,95%CI(15.22,41.25),P<0.05]。总体并发症发生率较高[比值比(OR)=3.52,95%CI(1.96,6.34),P<0.05],术后易出现成角、旋转及内翻畸形[OR=3.68,95%CI(1.40,9.68),P<0.05]。两种内固定方式在下肢不等长发生率上差异无统计学意义[OR=0.83,95%CI(0.38,1.85),P>0.05],末次随访时髋关节Harris评分差异也无统计学意义[WMD=-0.67,95%CI(-2.01,0.67),P>0.05]。

结论

与LPs相比,TENs手术时间短、术中出血少、骨折愈合时间短,患儿可更早完全负重。锁定钢板可减少术者X线暴露,术后成角、旋转及内翻畸形发生率低。因此,TENs和LPs都是治疗儿童股骨转子下骨折的最佳内固定方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/af39f09b0113/fped-11-1114265-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/934d3ac3d1a0/fped-11-1114265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/4f35ec949626/fped-11-1114265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/c1bd7d79881d/fped-11-1114265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/6062bc4cb263/fped-11-1114265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/8adf1a5af303/fped-11-1114265-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/f5a0ec891d2c/fped-11-1114265-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/198a058bb9ec/fped-11-1114265-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/5b8f333465b1/fped-11-1114265-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/d908771face6/fped-11-1114265-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/af39f09b0113/fped-11-1114265-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/934d3ac3d1a0/fped-11-1114265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/4f35ec949626/fped-11-1114265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/c1bd7d79881d/fped-11-1114265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/6062bc4cb263/fped-11-1114265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/8adf1a5af303/fped-11-1114265-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/f5a0ec891d2c/fped-11-1114265-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/198a058bb9ec/fped-11-1114265-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/5b8f333465b1/fped-11-1114265-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/d908771face6/fped-11-1114265-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07d9/10020654/af39f09b0113/fped-11-1114265-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Titanium elastic nails vs locking plate in pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.钛弹性钉与锁定钢板治疗小儿股骨转子下骨折的系统评价与Meta分析
Front Pediatr. 2023 Mar 3;11:1114265. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1114265. eCollection 2023.
2
[Effectiveness comparison of titanium elastic nail and locking compression plate fixation in treating femoral subtrochanteric fractures in older children].[钛弹性髓内钉与锁定加压钢板固定治疗大龄儿童股骨转子下骨折的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 15;31(10):1184-1189. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201704122.
3
Titanium elastic nailing versus locking compression plating in school-aged pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures.钛弹性髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗学龄期儿童股骨转子下骨折的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11568. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011568.
4
Comparison of titanium elastic nail and plate fixation of pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures.钛弹性髓内钉与钢板固定小儿股骨转子下骨折的比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Apr-May;33(3):232-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318288b496.
5
[Comparison of long Gamma 3 nail and proximal femur locking plate for the treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures].长柄Gamma 3钉与股骨近端锁定钢板治疗股骨转子下骨折的比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Feb 25;32(2):105-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.02.003.
6
Functional Outcome of Pediatric Subtrochanteric Fractures Treated With a Titanium Elastic Nailing System (TENS) Versus Plating.采用钛弹性髓内钉系统(TENS)与钢板治疗小儿股骨转子下骨折的功能预后
Cureus. 2023 Jun 6;15(6):e40036. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40036. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Operative choice for subtrochanteric femoral fracture in school-aged children: Triple elastic stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate.学龄期儿童股骨转子下骨折的手术选择:三弹性稳定髓内钉与锁定钢板的比较
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 26;10:894262. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.894262. eCollection 2022.
8
Proximal femoral nails antirotation, Gamma nails, and dynamic hip screws for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉、Gamma钉和动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的Meta分析
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Dec;100(8):859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
The definition and treatment of pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures with titanium elastic nails.钛弹性髓内钉治疗小儿股骨转子下骨折的定义与治疗
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):364-70. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000203005.50906.41.
10
Subtrochanteric Fractures: Comparison of Proximal Femur Locking Plate and Intramedullary Locking Nail Fixation Outcome.股骨转子下骨折:股骨近端锁定钢板与髓内锁定钉固定效果的比较
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):795-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-1004-3. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Traumatic obturator hip dislocation with subtrochanteric fracture in an 8-year-old child.病例报告:一名8岁儿童创伤性闭孔髋关节脱位合并转子下骨折。
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 14;12:1531518. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1531518. eCollection 2025.
2
A Rare Case of Non-ossifying Fibroma Causing Pathological Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture in a Child: A Common Lesion at an Uncommon Location.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):e73761. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73761. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Operative choice for subtrochanteric femoral fracture in school-aged children: Triple elastic stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate.学龄期儿童股骨转子下骨折的手术选择:三弹性稳定髓内钉与锁定钢板的比较
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 26;10:894262. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.894262. eCollection 2022.
2
An Alternative Fixation Option for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures in Children: Adult Proximal Humerus Plate.儿童股骨转子下骨折的另一种固定选择:成人肱骨近端板。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Sep 1;42(8):e828-e832. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002207. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
Pathological Fractures of the Proximal Femur in Children and Adolescents Treated with LCP Paediatric Hip Plate.
儿童和青少年股骨近端病理性骨折采用 LCP 儿童髋钢板治疗。
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89(1):68-74.
4
Outcome of proximal femur shaft fractures in school going children treated with locking compression plates.使用锁定加压钢板治疗的学龄儿童股骨近端骨干骨折的疗效
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Sep-Oct;37(5):1353-1358. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.3938.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Can titanium elastic nail be safely used for paediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures?钛弹性钉可安全用于儿童股骨转子下骨折吗?
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021 Jan;30(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000766.
7
Elastic nail fixation versus plate fixation of paediatric femoral fractures in school age patients - A retrospective observational study.学龄期儿童股骨干骨折弹性髓内钉与钢板固定的回顾性观察研究
J Orthop. 2019 Nov 27;19:153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.033. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
8
Enhancing stability by penetrating the apophysis of greater trochanter or the posterior neck cortex during titanium elastic nailing of paediatric subtrochanteric femoral fractures in children aged 5-12 years.在 5-12 岁儿童的儿童股骨转子下骨折中,经皮钛弹性钉固定时穿透大转子顶点或后颈皮质,增强稳定性。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020 Sep;29(5):478-484. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000699.
9
Extra-articular proximal femur fractures in children and adolescents treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing.儿童和青少年经弹性稳定髓内钉治疗的关节外股骨近端骨折。
Int Orthop. 2019 Dec;43(12):2849-2856. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04379-x. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
10
Retrospective, multicenter evaluation of complications in the treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures in pediatric patients.回顾性、多中心评估儿童股骨干骨折治疗中并发症。
Injury. 2019 Aug;50 Suppl 4:S60-S63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 7.