King Kristen L, Yu Miko, Husain S Ali, Patzer Rachel E, Sandra Vanessa, Reese Peter P, Schold Jesse D, Mohan Sumit
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA.
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Dec 30;8(3):442-454. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.12.021. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The use of race coefficients in equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) may have contributed to racial disparities in access to preemptive (without dialysis exposure) kidney transplantation (Ktx).
In this retrospective national cohort study of incident kidney transplant candidates in the United States from 2001 to 2019, we describe temporal trends and racial disparities in preemptive listing and the distribution of eGFR at listing, using eGFR as reported and after removing the race coefficient for Black candidates.
Among 511,686 candidates, preemptive listing increased over time, from 18% in 2001 to 33% in 2019. Non-Black candidates were listed preemptively nearly twice as frequently as Black candidates in 2019 (38% vs. 21% preemptive) and at higher eGFR values (median 15.6 vs. 15.0 ml/min per 1.73 m). After adjusting for candidate characteristics, including listing eGFR without the race coefficient, preemptive Black candidates still had significantly lower odds of preemptive deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation compared to non-Black candidates (odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.98).
Over the last 2 decades, Black patients were consistently less likely to be listed preemptively and were listed at lower eGFR values. Adjusting for listing eGFR with the race coefficient computationally removed did not eliminate the racial disparity, suggesting that additional efforts are needed to achieve equity in preemptive transplantation beyond adopting race-free eGFR equations.
估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)方程中种族系数的使用可能导致了在接受抢先(未接受透析)肾移植(Ktx)方面的种族差异。
在这项对2001年至2019年美国新发肾移植候选者的全国性回顾性队列研究中,我们描述了抢先列入名单的时间趋势和种族差异,以及列入名单时eGFR的分布情况,分别使用报告的eGFR以及去除黑人候选者种族系数后的eGFR。
在511,686名候选者中,抢先列入名单的比例随时间增加,从2001年的18%增至2019年的33%。2019年,非黑人候选者抢先列入名单的频率几乎是非黑人候选者的两倍(抢先比例分别为38%和21%),且eGFR值更高(中位数分别为每1.73平方米15.6和15.0毫升/分钟)。在对候选者特征进行调整后,包括使用去除种族系数后的列入名单时的eGFR,与非黑人候选者相比,抢先列入名单的黑人候选者接受抢先死亡供体(DD)肾移植的几率仍然显著更低(优势比0.87,95%置信区间:0.78 - 0.98)。
在过去20年中,黑人患者抢先列入名单的可能性一直较低,且列入名单时的eGFR值也较低。通过计算去除种族系数来调整列入名单时的eGFR并不能消除种族差异,这表明除了采用无种族的eGFR方程外,还需要做出额外努力以实现抢先移植的公平性。