Khan Raza A, Patel Nidhi, Folajimi Atunde, Raveena Bai Bansari, Patel Vrushak, Komminni Praveen Kumar, Palleti Sujith K, Hirani Shamsha
General Medicine, The University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Internal Medicine, Gujarat Medical & Education Research Society (GMERS), Vadodara, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35014. eCollection 2023 Feb.
The aim of this meta-analysis is to synthesize and critically evaluate the available evidence on the comparison of the efficacy and safety of metformin-based combination therapy versus metformin alone in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We performed the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies were identified using electronic searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and clinicaltrial.gov from inception to 31 January 2023. The outcomes examined in this meta-analysis included change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) (%), fasting plasma sugar (FPG) (mg/dl), and the number of individuals experiencing adverse events. Three studies met the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The reduction of HbA1C was significantly higher in metformin-based combination therapy (MD: -1.19, 95% CI: -2.05, -0.33, p-value: 0.007). No significant difference was reported between patients randomized in metformin-based combination therapy and metformin alone (MD: -18.67, 95% CI: -50.17, 12.84, p-value: 0.25). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis found that the reduction in HbA1C was significantly higher in patients receiving metformin-based combination therapy compared to metformin alone. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from the baseline. In relation to safety, no significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events between the two groups.
本荟萃分析的目的是综合并严格评估关于二甲双胍联合疗法与单独使用二甲双胍治疗儿童和青少年2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效和安全性比较的现有证据。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了本次荟萃分析。通过使用PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)和clinicaltrial.gov进行电子检索,从数据库建立至2023年1月31日,识别符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。本荟萃分析中检查的结果包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)(%)、空腹血糖(FPG)(mg/dl)相对于基线的变化,以及发生不良事件的个体数量。三项研究符合标准并纳入荟萃分析。基于二甲双胍的联合治疗组糖化血红蛋白的降低幅度显著更高(MD:-1.19,95%CI:-2.05,-0.33,p值:0.007)。在基于二甲双胍的联合治疗组和单独使用二甲双胍组的随机分组患者之间未报告显著差异(MD:-18.67,95%CI:-50.17,12.84,p值:0.25)。总之,本荟萃分析发现,接受基于二甲双胍联合治疗的患者糖化血红蛋白的降低幅度显著高于单独使用二甲双胍的患者。两组之间空腹血糖(FPG)相对于基线的变化无显著差异。在安全性方面,两组之间不良事件和严重不良事件的发生率无显著差异。