From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Anesth Analg. 2023 Jun 1;136(6):1182-1188. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006471. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Surgical patients with preexisting neurological diseases create greater challenges to perioperative management, and choice of anesthetic is often complicated. We investigated neuraxial anesthesia use in total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) recipients with multiple sclerosis or myasthenia gravis compared to the general population.
We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing a TKA/THA with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or myasthenia gravis (Premier Health Database, 2006-2019). The primary outcome was neuraxial anesthesia use in multiple sclerosis or myasthenia gravis patients compared to the general population. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation. We measured the association between the aforementioned subgroups and neuraxial anesthesia use. Subsequently, subgroup-specific associations between neuraxial anesthesia and secondary outcomes were measured. We report odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Among 2,184,193 TKA/THAs, 7559 and 3176 had a multiple sclerosis or myasthenia gravis diagnosis, respectively. Compared to the general population, neuraxial anesthesia use was lower in multiple sclerosis patients (OR, 0.61; CI, 0.57-0.65; P < .0001) and no different in myasthenia gravis patients (OR, 1.05; CI, 0.96-1.14; P = .304). Multiple sclerosis patients administered neuraxial anesthesia (compared to those without neuraxial anesthesia) had lower odds of prolonged length of stay (OR, 0.63; CI, 0.53-0.76; P < .0001) mirroring neuraxial anesthesia benefits seen in the general population.
Neuraxial anesthesia use was lower in surgical patients with multiple sclerosis compared to the general population but no different in those with myasthenia gravis. Neuraxial use was associated with lower odds of prolonged length of stay.
患有先前存在的神经系统疾病的外科患者给围手术期管理带来了更大的挑战,麻醉选择通常较为复杂。我们研究了多发性硬化症或重症肌无力患者接受全膝关节和髋关节置换术(TKA/THA)时与普通人群相比使用脊麻的情况。
我们回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2019 年在 Premier Health 数据库中诊断为多发性硬化症或重症肌无力的接受 TKA/THA 的患者。主要结果是多发性硬化症或重症肌无力患者与普通人群相比使用脊麻的情况。次要结果为住院时间、入住重症监护病房和机械通气。我们测量了上述亚组与脊麻使用之间的关联。随后,测量了亚组特异性的脊麻与次要结果之间的关联。我们报告比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
在 2184193 例 TKA/THA 中,分别有 7559 例和 3176 例患有多发性硬化症或重症肌无力。与普通人群相比,多发性硬化症患者使用脊麻的可能性较低(OR,0.61;CI,0.57-0.65;P<0.0001),重症肌无力患者则没有差异(OR,1.05;CI,0.96-1.14;P=0.304)。接受脊麻的多发性硬化症患者(与未接受脊麻的患者相比),住院时间延长的可能性较低(OR,0.63;CI,0.53-0.76;P<0.0001),这与普通人群中脊麻的益处相似。
与普通人群相比,多发性硬化症外科患者使用脊麻的可能性较低,但重症肌无力患者则没有差异。脊麻的使用与住院时间延长的可能性降低有关。