Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Mar 1;12(3):19. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.19.
Performance comparison of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual field (VF) summary metrics for detecting glaucomatous progression.
Thirty healthy control eyes (mean deviation [MD], -1.25 ± 2.03; pattern standard deviation [PSD] , 1.78 ± 0.77) and 91 patient eyes comprised of 54 glaucoma patients and 37 glaucoma suspects (MD, -1.58 ± 1.96; PSD, 2.82 ± 1.92) with a follow-up of at least 1 year formed a group to evaluate progression with event analyses (P-Event). A subset of eyes with an additional criterion of a minimum of four tests was used for trend analyses (P-Trend) (30 healthy controls and 73 patients). For P-Event analysis, test-retest variability thresholds (lower 5th percentile) were estimated with repeat tests within a 4-month period. A P-Event eye was considered a "progressor" if the difference between follow-up and baseline tests exceeded the variability thresholds. For the P-Trend analysis, rates of change were calculated based on least-squares regression. Negative rates with significant (P < 0.05) values were considered progressing. For a reference standard, 17 patient eyes were classified as definitely progressing based on clear evidence of structural and corresponding functional progression.
Isolated OCT and VF summary metrics were either inadequately sensitive or not too specific. Combinations of OCT-OCT and OCT-VF metrics markedly improved specificity to nearly 100%. A novel combination of OCT metrics (circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer) showed high precision, with 13 of the 15 statistical progressors confirmed as true positives.
Although relying solely on metrics is not recommended for clinical purposes, in situations requiring very high specificity and precision, combinations of OCT-OCT metrics can be used.
All available OCT and VF metrics can miss eyes with progressive glaucomatous damage and/or can falsely identify progression in stable eyes.
比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和视野(VF)总结指标在检测青光眼进展方面的性能。
30 只健康对照眼(平均偏差 [MD],-1.25±2.03;模式标准差 [PSD],1.78±0.77)和 91 只患者眼(MD,-1.58±1.96;PSD,2.82±1.92)组成一个组,进行事件分析(P-Event)评估。使用至少 1 年的随访数据,一组包括 54 名青光眼患者和 37 名青光眼疑似患者。对具有至少 4 次检查的附加标准的眼子集进行趋势分析(P-Trend)(30 只健康对照眼和 73 只患者眼)。对于 P-Event 分析,在 4 个月的时间内重复测试来估计测试-测试间变异性阈值(第 5 个低百分位)。如果随访和基线测试之间的差异超过变异性阈值,则认为 P-Event 眼是“进展者”。对于 P-Trend 分析,基于最小二乘回归计算变化率。具有显著(P<0.05)值的负率被认为是进展的。作为参考标准,根据结构和相应功能进展的明确证据,将 17 只患者眼归类为明确进展。
单独的 OCT 和 VF 总结指标要么不够敏感,要么特异性不够高。OCT-OCT 和 OCT-VF 指标的组合显著提高了特异性,接近 100%。OCT 指标(视盘周围视网膜神经纤维层和节细胞层)的新组合具有高精度,15 个统计进展者中有 13 个被确认为真正的阳性。
尽管在临床情况下不建议单独依靠指标,但在需要非常高的特异性和精度的情况下,可以使用 OCT-OCT 指标的组合。
翻译后版本由字节跳动公司提供。