Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 May 1;177(5):461-471. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0115.
Children with medical complexity (CMC) have chronic conditions and high health needs and may experience fragmented care.
To compare the effectiveness of a structured complex care program, Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO), with usual care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial used a waitlist variation for randomizing patients from 12 complex care clinics in Ontario, Canada, over 2 years. The study was conducted from December 2016 to June 2021. Participants were identified based on complex care clinic referral and randomly allocated into an intervention group, seen at the next available clinic appointment, or a control group that was placed on a waitlist to receive the intervention after 12 months.
Assignment of a nurse practitioner-pediatrician dyad partnering with families in a structured complex care clinic to provide intensive care coordination and comprehensive plans of care.
Co-primary outcomes, assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization, were service delivery indicators from the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care that scored (1) coordination of care among health care professionals, (2) coordination of care between health care professionals and families, and (3) utility of care planning tools. Secondary outcomes included child and parent health outcomes and child health care system utilization and cost.
Of 144 participants randomized, 141 had complete health administrative data, and 139 had complete baseline surveys. The median (IQR) age of the participants was 29 months (9-102); 83 (60%) were male. At 12 months, scores for utility of care planning tools improved in the intervention group compared with the waitlist group (adjusted odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 3.9-21.9; P < .001), with no difference between groups for the other 2 co-primary outcomes. There were no group differences for secondary outcomes of child outcomes, parent outcomes, and health care system utilization and cost. At 24 months, when both groups were receiving the intervention, no primary outcome differences were observed. Total health care costs in the second year were lower for the intervention group (median, CAD$17 891; IQR, 6098-61 346; vs CAD$37 524; IQR, 9338-119 547 [US $13 415; IQR, 4572-45 998; vs US $28 136; IQR, 7002-89 637]; P = .01).
The CCKO program improved the perceived utility of care planning tools but not other outcomes at 1 year. Extended evaluation periods may be helpful in assessing pediatric complex care interventions.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02928757.
患有医疗复杂性 (CMC) 的儿童存在慢性疾病和高健康需求,可能会经历碎片化的护理。
比较结构化复杂护理计划——安大略省复杂护理儿童(CCKO)与常规护理的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机临床试验,采用候补名单变化,在 2 年内从加拿大安大略省的 12 个复杂护理诊所随机分配患者。该研究于 2016 年 12 月至 2021 年 6 月进行。参与者是根据复杂护理诊所的转诊确定的,并随机分配到干预组,在下次可用的诊所预约就诊,或对照组,在接受干预前在候补名单上等待 12 个月。
指派一名护士执业医师搭档与家庭一起在结构化的复杂护理诊所提供强化护理协调和综合护理计划。
主要结果,在基线、6、12 和 24 个月后随机评估,来自家庭体验协调护理服务指标,评分(1)医疗保健专业人员之间的协调护理,(2)医疗保健专业人员与家庭之间的协调护理,和(3)护理计划工具的实用性。次要结果包括儿童和家长的健康结果以及儿童的医疗保健系统利用率和成本。
在随机分配的 144 名参与者中,有 141 名有完整的健康管理数据,有 139 名有完整的基线调查。参与者的中位(IQR)年龄为 29 个月(9-102);83 名(60%)为男性。在 12 个月时,干预组的护理计划工具实用性评分较候补组提高(调整后的优势比,9.3;95%CI,3.9-21.9;P<0.001),两组在其他 2 个主要结果上无差异。次要结果包括儿童结局、父母结局以及医疗保健系统利用率和成本,两组之间没有差异。在 24 个月时,当两组都接受干预时,没有观察到主要结果的差异。干预组第二年的总医疗保健费用较低(中位数,CAD$17891;IQR,6098-61346;vs CAD$37524;IQR,9338-119547[US$13415;IQR,4572-45998;vs US$28136;IQR,7002-89637];P=0.01)。
CCKO 计划在 1 年内提高了对护理计划工具的感知实用性,但其他结果没有改善。延长评估期可能有助于评估儿科复杂护理干预措施。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02928757。