• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理管理员对基本家庭护理员政策的看法。

Long-Term Care Administrator Perspectives on an Essential Family Caregiver Policy.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):816-820. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.014
PMID:36940780
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Characterize the implementation, benefits, and challenges of an Essential Family Caregiver (EFC) program, a novel policy implemented in long-term care (LTC) settings during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indiana. Characterize LTC administrator perspectives on family/caregiver involvement in the LTC setting.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Administrators from 4 Indiana LTC facilities.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, a convenience sample of 4 LTC administrators was recruited. Each participant completed 1 interview during January to May 2021. Following transcription, a thematic analysis approach with 2 cycles of qualitative coding identified relevant themes.

RESULTS

Four LTC administrators participated, representing both urban and rural nonprofit nursing homes. Participants spoke positively of the program despite implementation challenges including perceived infection risk, policy interpretation, and logistical challenges. The psychological impact of isolation for nursing home residents was emphasized as a critical consideration alongside physical health concerns. LTC administrators desired to support resident well-being while maintaining good standing with regulatory agencies.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Based on a limited sample, Indiana's EFC policy was viewed favorably by LTC administrators as a tool to balance resident and family psychosocial needs with infection-related health risks. LTC administrators desired a collaborative approach from regulators as they worked to implement a novel policy. Consistent with participant desire for broader caregiver access to residents, more recent policymaking has reflected growing recognition of the critical role of family members not only as companions but also as care providers, even in a structured care environment.

摘要

目的

描述在印第安纳州 COVID-19 大流行期间在长期护理 (LTC) 环境中实施的新型政策——基本家庭护理员 (EFC) 计划的实施、效益和挑战。描述 LTC 管理者对家庭/护理员在 LTC 环境中参与的看法。

设计

半结构式定性访谈。

地点和参与者

印第安纳州 4 家 LTC 设施的管理人员。

方法

在这项定性研究中,招募了 4 名 LTC 管理人员进行方便抽样。每位参与者在 2021 年 1 月至 5 月期间完成了 1 次访谈。转录后,采用两轮定性编码的主题分析方法确定了相关主题。

结果

4 名 LTC 管理人员参与了研究,他们代表了城市和农村非营利性养老院。尽管存在实施挑战,包括感知的感染风险、政策解释和后勤挑战,但参与者对该计划给予了积极评价。隔离对养老院居民的心理影响被强调为与身体健康问题同等重要的关键考虑因素。LTC 管理人员希望在维护与监管机构良好关系的同时,支持居民的幸福感。

结论和意义

基于有限的样本,印第安纳州的 EFC 政策受到 LTC 管理人员的好评,认为这是平衡居民和家庭心理社会需求与感染相关健康风险的一种工具。LTC 管理人员希望监管机构采取协作的方法,因为他们正在努力实施一项新政策。与参与者希望更广泛的护理人员能够接触到居民的愿望一致,最近的决策制定反映出越来越认识到家庭成员的关键作用,他们不仅是陪伴者,而且是护理提供者,即使在结构化的护理环境中也是如此。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Care Administrator Perspectives on an Essential Family Caregiver Policy.长期护理管理员对基本家庭护理员政策的看法。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):816-820. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Caring for a Relative With Dementia in Long-Term Care During COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间于长期护理中照顾患有痴呆症的亲属
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Mar;23(3):428-433.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.026. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
3
"Nobody But a Family Member Can Do It Quite the Same Way": Understanding the Meaning of Mealtimes to Residents and Families in Long-Term Care Homes During the Pandemic.“除了家人,没人能做得一样好”:大流行期间长期护理院居民和家庭对用餐时间意义的理解。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad168.
4
Informal Caregivers' Perspectives on the Mandated No Visitation Policy During COVID-19 Pandemic in Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Study.长期护理中 COVID-19 大流行期间强制性无探视政策下非正式照护者的观点:一项定性研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Dec;47(12):19-26. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20211109-05. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
Exploring experiences of loneliness among Canadian long-term care residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.探索 COVID-19 大流行期间加拿大长期护理居民的孤独体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12509. doi: 10.1111/opn.12509. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
6
Essential Long-Term Care Workers Commonly Hold Second Jobs and Double- or Triple-Duty Caregiving Roles.基本长期护理工作者通常从事第二职业,并承担双重或三重护理职责。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1657-1660. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16509. Epub 2020 May 14.
7
Quality improvement collaborative approach to COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in long-term care homes: a mixed-methods implementation study.长期护理院 COVID-19 大流行准备的质量改进协作方法:一项混合方法实施研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 8;13(2):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002589.
8
Experiences of Families, Staff, Volunteers, and Administrators With Namaste Care for Persons With Advanced Dementia in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes.加拿大长期护理之家接受 Namaste 关爱对晚期痴呆患者的家庭、工作人员、志愿者和管理人员的体验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):830-836. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
9
Perspectives of nursing home administrators across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国养老院管理者在新冠疫情大流行期间的观点。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):686-696. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14104. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
10
Cracks in the foundation: The experience of care aides in long-term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.基础裂痕:新冠疫情期间长期护理院护工的经历。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):198-205. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18024. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in State Essential Caregiver Programs for Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间养老院国家基本护理人员计划的变化
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan 5:7334648241309764. doi: 10.1177/07334648241309764.