Wang Ying, Liu Mandong, Chan Wallace Chi Ho, Zhou Jing, Chi Iris
School of Philosophy and Sociology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Dec;19(6):694-701. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001413.
This study reports the evaluation of the original 31-item Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD) using a sample of caregivers of recently deceased older adults in China, and the validation of a shortened version (QODD-C) derived from the original scale.
The translation was performed using a forward and back method. The full scale was tested with 212 caregivers of decedents in four regions of China. Confirmatory factor analysis tested the model fit between the full Chinese version and the original conceptual model and generated the QODD-C. The psychometric analysis was performed to evaluate the QODD-C's internal consistency, content validity, construct validity, and discriminant validity.
A five-domain, 18-item QODD-C was identified with excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.933; split-half Pearson's value = 0.855). The QODD-C total score was significantly associated with constructs related to five domains. The caregiver's relationship with the decedent, the decedent's age at death, death reason, and death place was significantly associated with the QODD-C total score.
The QODD-C is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the quality of dying and death among the Chinese populations.
本研究报告了对原始的31项临终与死亡质量问卷(QODD)在中国近期去世的老年人照料者样本中的评估,以及对源自原始量表的简版(QODD-C)的验证。
采用正向和反向翻译法进行翻译。对中国四个地区的212名死者照料者进行了完整量表测试。验证性因素分析测试了完整中文版与原始概念模型之间的模型拟合度,并生成了QODD-C。进行了心理测量分析,以评估QODD-C的内部一致性、内容效度、结构效度和区分效度。
确定了一个包含五个领域、18个条目的QODD-C,其内部一致性信度极佳(克朗巴哈系数 = 0.933;分半皮尔逊值 = 0.855)。QODD-C总分与五个领域相关的构念显著相关。照料者与死者之间的关系、死者死亡时的年龄、死亡原因和死亡地点与QODD-C总分显著相关。
QODD-C是评估中国人群临终与死亡质量的有效且可靠的工具。