Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Clin J Pain. 2023 Apr 1;39(4):166-174. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001101.
Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent and disabling for older adults. Movement-evoked pain is an emerging measure that may help to predict disability; but is not currently a part of geriatric LBP clinical care. This study tested the safety and feasibility of a new Movement-Evoked Provocation Test for Low Back Pain in Older Adults (MEPLO). We also compared associations between movement-evoked pain via 2 different scoring methods and disability-associated outcomes.
Thirty-nine older adults with persistent LBP provided baseline recalled and resting pain ratings, self-reported physical function, and usual gait speed. Participants then completed MEPLO, involving 4 tasks essential for functional independence: chair rises, trunk rotation, reaching, and walking. Movement-evoked pain was then quantified using the traditional change score (delta) method of pain premovement to postmovement; and also, a new aggregate method that combines pain ratings after the 4 tasks.
No safety or feasibility issues were identified. Compared with the delta score, the aggregate score was more strongly associated with self-reported physical function (beta: -0.495 vs. -0.090) and usual gait speed (beta: -0.450 vs. -0.053). Similarly, the aggregate score was more strongly associated with self-reported physical function than recalled and resting pain (beta: -0.470, -0.283, and 0.136, respectively).
This study shows the safety and feasibility of testing movement-evoked pain in older adults with persistent LBP, and its potential superiority to traditional pain measures. Future studies must validate these findings and test the extent to which MEPLO is implementable to change with geriatric LBP standard of care.
腰痛(LBP)在老年人中非常普遍且致残。运动诱发疼痛是一种新兴的衡量标准,可能有助于预测残疾;但目前并非老年 LBP 临床护理的一部分。本研究测试了一种新的用于老年腰痛的运动诱发激发测试(MEPLO)的安全性和可行性。我们还比较了通过两种不同评分方法的运动诱发疼痛与残疾相关结局之间的关联。
39 名持续性腰痛的老年人提供了基线回忆和静息疼痛评分、自我报告的身体功能和惯用步行速度。然后,参与者完成了 MEPLO,包括 4 项对功能独立性至关重要的任务:坐起、躯干旋转、伸手和行走。然后使用运动前到运动后的疼痛变化分数(delta)方法来量化运动诱发的疼痛;还使用了一种新的综合方法,该方法结合了四项任务后的疼痛评分。
没有发现安全性或可行性问题。与 delta 评分相比,综合评分与自我报告的身体功能(beta:-0.495 对-0.090)和惯用步行速度(beta:-0.450 对-0.053)的相关性更强。同样,综合评分与自我报告的身体功能的相关性强于回忆和静息疼痛(beta:-0.470、-0.283 和 0.136)。
本研究表明,在持续性腰痛的老年人中测试运动诱发疼痛是安全可行的,并且可能优于传统疼痛测量方法。未来的研究必须验证这些发现,并测试 MEPLO 在多大程度上可以实施以改变老年 LBP 的标准护理。