Suppr超能文献

双侧深蹲运动模式中的负荷转移对优势和非优势肢体的地面反作用力和肌肉活动的影响。

Offset Loading in a Bilateral Squatting Movement Pattern Influences Ground-Reaction Force and Muscle Activity in the Dominant and Nondominant Limb.

机构信息

Applied Science and Performance Institute, Tampa, FL,USA.

Concordia University Chicago, River Forest, IL,USA.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Mar 21;18(5):523-529. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0407. Print 2023 May 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore whether offset loading in the barbell squat altered ground-reaction force (GRF) and muscle activation in the dominant (D) and nondominant (ND) lower limb compared to traditional squats.

METHODS

Twelve well-trained men (age 26.4 [3.2] y; 10.3 [1.9] y experience) performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 60% of their previously measured 1-repetition maximum. Sets were quasi-randomized between traditional loading (TDL), dominant-side offset loading (OS-D), and nondominant-side offset loading (OS-ND). All repetitions were performed on a dual force plate with electromyography sensors on the prime mover muscles of the squat. GRF symmetry was assessed using the symmetry index (SI) to determine the direction (D [+] or ND [-]) and magnitude (%) of the asymmetry. Finally, the first 3 and final 3 repetitions of each set were compared for compensatory changes in symmetry.

RESULTS

OS-D induced a significant change in limb SI relative to TDL (5.21% vs 1.44%; P = .011); however, no significant difference in limb SI was seen between TDL and OS-ND (-0.66% vs 1.44%; P = .278). No asymmetries between D and ND muscle activation were present in any condition. TDL and OS-D squats exhibited significant improvements in limb SI between the first 3 and final 3 repetitions (P = .035 and .011, respectively); however, no such improvement was seen in OS-ND.

CONCLUSIONS

OS-D is capable of significantly altering GRF limb SI in a bilateral squat; however, OS-ND appears to exhibit no GRF or electromyography effects relative to TDL. Thus, the results of this study do not support the use of OS-ND in the pursuit of strengthening a weaker limb, suggesting that unilateral training may be a preferred mode of exercise for this desired outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在杠铃深蹲中施加偏心负荷是否会改变与传统深蹲相比,在主导(D)和非主导(ND)下肢中的地面反作用力(GRF)和肌肉激活。

方法

12 名训练有素的男性(年龄 26.4 [3.2] 岁;10.3 [1.9] 年经验)完成了 3 组 10 次重复,负荷为之前测量的 1 次重复最大重量的 60%。组之间以传统负荷(TDL)、优势侧偏心负荷(OS-D)和非优势侧偏心负荷(OS-ND)的形式进行准随机分配。所有重复都在一个双力板上进行,在深蹲的主要肌肉上有肌电图传感器。GRF 对称性使用对称性指数(SI)进行评估,以确定不对称的方向(D [+] 或 ND [-])和程度(%)。最后,比较每组的前 3 次和最后 3 次重复以确定对称性的补偿变化。

结果

与 TDL 相比,OS-D 引起了明显的肢体 SI 变化(5.21%对 1.44%;P =.011);然而,TDL 和 OS-ND 之间的肢体 SI 没有显著差异(-0.66%对 1.44%;P =.278)。在任何条件下,D 和 ND 肌肉激活之间都没有出现不对称。TDL 和 OS-D 深蹲在第一 3 次和最后 3 次重复之间的肢体 SI 都有显著改善(P =.035 和.011);然而,OS-ND 则没有这种改善。

结论

OS-D 能够在双侧深蹲中显著改变 GRF 肢体 SI;然而,OS-ND 似乎与 TDL 相比没有 GRF 或肌电图效应。因此,本研究的结果不支持在追求增强较弱肢体的情况下使用 OS-ND,这表明单侧训练可能是实现这一目标的首选运动模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验