Izquierdo M, González-Badillo J J, Häkkinen K, Ibáñez J, Kraemer W J, Altadill A, Eslava J, Gorostiaga E M
Studies, Research and Sport Medicine Center. Government of Navarre, C/Sangüesa 34, 31005 Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Sep;27(9):718-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-872825.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different loads on repetition speed during single sets of repetitions to failure in bench press and parallel squat. Thirty-six physical active men performed 1-repetition maximum in a bench press (1 RM (BP)) and half squat position (1 RM (HS)), and performed maximal power-output continuous repetition sets randomly every 10 days until failure with a submaximal load (60 %, 65 %, 70 %, and 75 % of 1RM, respectively) during bench press and parallel squat. Average velocity of each repetition was recorded by linking a rotary encoder to the end part of the bar. The values of 1 RM (BP) and 1 RM (HS) were 91 +/- 17 and 200 +/- 20 kg, respectively. The number of repetitions performed for a given percentage of 1RM was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in half squat than in bench press performance. Average repetition velocity decreased at a greater rate in bench press than in parallel squat. The significant reductions observed in the average repetition velocity (expressed as a percentage of the average velocity achieved during the initial repetition) were observed at higher percentage of the total number of repetitions performed in parallel squat (48 - 69 %) than in bench press (34 - 40 %) actions. The major finding in this study was that, for a given muscle action (bench press or parallel squat), the pattern of reduction in the relative average velocity achieved during each repetition and the relative number of repetitions performed was the same for all percentages of 1RM tested. However, relative average velocity decreased at a greater rate in bench press than in parallel squat performance. This would indicate that in bench press the significant reductions observed in the average repetition velocity occurred when the number of repetitions was over one third (34 %) of the total number of repetitions performed, whereas in parallel squat it was nearly one half (48 %). Conceptually, this would indicate that for a given exercise (bench press or squat) and percentage of maximal dynamic strength (1RM), the pattern of velocity decrease can be predicted over a set of repetitions, so that a minimum repetition threshold to ensure maximal speed performance is determined.
本研究的目的是检验在卧推和深蹲至力竭的单组重复训练中,不同负荷对重复速度的影响。36名体育锻炼男性分别在卧推(1次重复最大值,即1RM(BP))和半蹲姿势(1RM(HS))下完成了1次重复最大值测试,并每10天随机进行一次最大功率输出的连续重复训练组,直至在卧推和深蹲训练中分别使用次最大负荷(分别为1RM的60%、65%、70%和75%)至力竭。通过将旋转编码器连接到杠铃杆的末端来记录每次重复的平均速度。1RM(BP)和1RM(HS)的值分别为91±17千克和200±20千克。在1RM的给定百分比下,半蹲训练中完成的重复次数显著高于卧推训练(p<0.001)。卧推中平均重复速度的下降速率大于深蹲。在深蹲训练中,在完成的总重复次数的较高百分比(48%-69%)时观察到平均重复速度显著下降(以初始重复时达到的平均速度的百分比表示),而在卧推训练中这一百分比为34%-40%。本研究的主要发现是,对于给定的肌肉动作(卧推或深蹲),在所有测试的1RM百分比下,每次重复中相对平均速度的下降模式以及完成的相对重复次数是相同的。然而,卧推中相对平均速度的下降速率大于深蹲训练。这表明在卧推中,当重复次数超过总重复次数的三分之一(34%)时,平均重复速度会显著下降,而在深蹲中这一比例接近二分之一(48%)。从概念上讲,这表明对于给定的运动(卧推或深蹲)和最大动态力量百分比(1RM),可以预测一组重复训练中速度下降的模式,从而确定确保最大速度表现的最小重复阈值。