• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Medicare Reimbursement Trends Sustainable?颈椎间盘置换术的医疗保险报销趋势是否可持续?
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):222-229. doi: 10.14444/8428. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Trends in costs, reimbursements, and surgeon payments for cervical disc arthroplasty cost of care from 2009 to 2019.2009 年至 2019 年颈椎间盘置换术的费用、报销和外科医生薪酬趋势。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 14;39(5):690-699. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23452. Print 2023 Nov 1.
3
Medicare Reimbursement for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty From 2000 to 2019: An Unsustainable Trend.2000 年至 2019 年髋关节和膝关节置换术的医疗保险报销:不可持续的趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1174-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Medicare Physician Fee Reimbursement for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Not Kept Up with Inflation from 2002 to 2019.自 2002 年至 2019 年,医疗保险医师对膝关节翻修术的费用报销未跟上通胀水平。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 May 5;103(9):778-785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01034.
5
Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Study Showing Significant Decrease from 2002 to 2019.经通胀调整的髋关节翻修术 Medicare 报销:研究显示,2002 年至 2019 年显著下降。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 7;103(13):1212-1219. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01643.
6
Procedure Reimbursement, Inflation, and the Declining Buying Power of the Vascular Surgeon (2011-2021).手术报销、通货膨胀与血管外科医生购买力的下降(2011-2021 年)。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Primary and Revision Cervical Disc Arthroplasty from 2010-2020: Patient Demographics, Utilization Trends, and Health Care Reimbursements.2010 年至 2020 年原发性和翻修颈椎间盘置换术:患者人口统计学、利用趋势和医疗保健报销。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:e344-e349. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
8
Trends in Medicare reimbursement for neurosurgical procedures: 2000 to 2018.医疗保险对神经外科手术报销的趋势:2000 年至 2018 年。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 1;132(2):649-655. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181949. Print 2020 Feb 1.
9
Over 20 years of declining Medicare reimbursement for spine surgeons: a temporal and geographic analysis from 2000 to 2021.20多年来脊柱外科医生的医疗保险报销费用不断下降:2000年至2021年的时间和地理分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Mar 25;37(3):452-459. doi: 10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211368. Print 2022 Sep 1.
10
Declining Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Physician Fees: An Unsustainable Trend in Hip Arthroscopy.通货膨胀调整后 Medicare 医师费用下降:髋关节镜手术中的一个不可持续趋势。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul 1;32(13):604-610. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00080. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level disc degenerative disease with preoperative reversible kyphosis.颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗术前可复性后凸的单节段椎间盘退行性疾病。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106493. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106493. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Comparison of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Outpatient Setting.门诊环境下两级颈椎间盘置换与两级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 15;46(10):658-664. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003871.
3
Clinical and radiological outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty in the patients with preoperative reversible kyphosis: A matched cohort study.术前可复性后凸患者行单节段颈椎间盘置换术的临床和影像学结果:一项配对队列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106247. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106247. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.门诊颈椎间盘置换术与住院颈椎间盘置换术安全性的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2021 Sep;11(7):1121-1133. doi: 10.1177/2192568220959265. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
The Outcomes of Patients With Neck Pain Following ACDF: A Comparison of Patients With Radiculopathy, Myelopathy, or Mixed Symptomatology.颈椎间盘切除融合术后颈部疼痛患者的结局:根性病变、脊髓病或混合症状患者的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Nov 1;45(21):1485-1490. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003613.
6
Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.最近 Medicare 在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的利用和报销方面的趋势。
Spine J. 2020 Nov;20(11):1737-1743. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Cervical Disc Replacement: Trends, Costs, and Complications.颈椎间盘置换:趋势、成本与并发症
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):647-654. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0246. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
8
Asymptomatic ACDF Nonunions Underestimate the True Prevalence of Radiographic Pseudarthrosis.无症状性前路颈椎间盘切除融合术骨不连低估了影像学假关节的真实发生率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jul 1;45(13):E776-E780. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003444.
9
Medicare Reimbursement for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty From 2000 to 2019: An Unsustainable Trend.2000 年至 2019 年髋关节和膝关节置换术的医疗保险报销:不可持续的趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1174-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
The Safety of Single and Multilevel Cervical Total Disc Replacement in Ambulatory Surgery Centers.在日间手术中心行单节段和多节段颈椎全椎间盘置换术的安全性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):512-521. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003307.

颈椎间盘置换术的医疗保险报销趋势是否可持续?

Are Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Medicare Reimbursement Trends Sustainable?

作者信息

Mills Emily S, Mayfield Cory K, Shelby Tara, Ton Andy T, Hah Raymond J, Alluri Ram K

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Keck School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):222-229. doi: 10.14444/8428. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

DOI:10.14444/8428
PMID:36944474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10165667/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was originally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2007 as a motion-sparing procedure to treat cervical degenerative disc disease. Since then, promising results from randomized control trials have led to increasing popularity. However, data discussing monetary trends are limited. The aim of this study was to determine how utilization, hospital charges, and Medicare physician reimbursement for CDA have changed over time.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, International Classification of Diseases procedure codes were used to identify all patients who underwent CDA from 2007 to 2017 in the National Inpatient Sample database. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was queried for primary CDA using current procedural terminology codes to determine Medicare physician reimbursement from 2009 to 2021. Nominal monetary values were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index and inflation-adjusted data reported in 2021 US dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 33,079 weighted patients who underwent CDA were included for analysis. CDA utilization increased by 183% from 2007 to 2017, with Medicare beneficiary utilization increasing 149%. Inflation-adjusted total hospital charges for CDA increased by 22.4%. However, inflation-adjusted Medicare physician reimbursement fell by 1.20% per year, demonstrating a total decrease of 12.9%, starting at $1928 in 2009 and declining to $1679 in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

While utilization and total hospital charges for CDA continue to rise, Medicare physician reimbursement has not shown the same trend. In fact, inflation-adjusted reimbursement has seen a steady decline since FDA approval in 2007. If this trend persists, it may become unsustainable for physicians to continue offering CDA to Medicare patients. As disproportionate increases in hospital charges incentivize a transition to outpatient CDA, stricter patient selection criteria associated with outpatient procedures may create health care disparities for Medicare patients and those with higher comorbidity burden.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows the decreasing reimbursement trends for CDA, which may disproportionately affect Medicare patients and those with increased comorbidities.

摘要

背景

颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)最初于2007年获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,作为一种保留运动功能的手术用于治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病。从那时起,随机对照试验的良好结果使其越来越受欢迎。然而,关于费用趋势的数据有限。本研究的目的是确定CDA的使用情况、医院收费以及医疗保险医师报销费用随时间的变化情况。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,使用国际疾病分类手术编码在国家住院样本数据库中识别2007年至2017年期间所有接受CDA的患者。使用当前手术术语编码查询医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医师费用表查询工具,以确定2009年至2021年的原发性CDA医疗保险医师报销费用。使用消费者价格指数对名义货币价值进行通货膨胀调整,并以2021年美元报告通货膨胀调整后的数据。

结果

总共纳入33079例接受CDA的加权患者进行分析。从2007年到2017年,CDA的使用量增加了183%,医疗保险受益人的使用量增加了149%。CDA的通货膨胀调整后总医院收费增加了22.4%。然而,通货膨胀调整后的医疗保险医师报销费用每年下降1.20%,从2009年的1928美元开始,到2021年降至1679美元,总计下降了12.9%。

结论

虽然CDA的使用量和总医院收费持续上升,但医疗保险医师报销费用并未呈现相同趋势。事实上,自2007年FDA批准以来,通货膨胀调整后的报销费用一直在稳步下降。如果这种趋势持续下去,医生继续为医疗保险患者提供CDA可能变得不可持续。由于医院收费的不成比例增加促使向门诊CDA过渡,与门诊手术相关的更严格患者选择标准可能会给医疗保险患者和合并症负担较高的患者造成医疗保健差异。

临床意义

本研究显示了CDA报销费用下降的趋势,这可能对医疗保险患者和合并症增加的患者产生不成比例的影响。