• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗术前可复性后凸的单节段椎间盘退行性疾病。

Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level disc degenerative disease with preoperative reversible kyphosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106493. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106493. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106493
PMID:33493880
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whether and when cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) could be indicated for preoperative cervical spine kyphosis is unclear. The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of single-level CDA and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the patient with preoperative reversible kyphosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2014-2018, patients who underwent single-level CDA and single-level ACDF were consecutively reviewed. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index and VAS were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Range of motion (ROM), C2-7 Cobb angle, functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, and heterotopic ossification (HO) were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight CDA patients (a mean follow-up of 39.8 months) and 42 ACDF patients (37.6 months) with preoperative reversible kyphosis were included. Both groups had significant improvements in clinical outcomes, without statistically significant differences. Before surgery, there was no significant difference in cervical alignment and ROM between groups. After surgery, both groups had a significant increase in C2-7 angle and FSU without significant inter-group differences. At the last follow-up, CDA group consisted of 5 cases of lordosis, 11 cases of kyphosis and 22 cases of straight spine, while the corresponding case number in ACDF group was 4, 12 and 26 (P = 0.866). The C2-7 ROM was preserved in both groups. The segmental ROM of CDA group decreased mildly from 8.3° preoperatively to 5.1° finally, whereas the segmental ROM of ACDF group decreased significantly to nearly zero. 60.5 % (23/38) patients in CDA group developed HO with 9 levels of grade Ⅲ and 3 levels of grade Ⅳ.

CONCLUSION

For the patients with single-level disc degenerative disease and preoperative reversible kyphosis, both CDA and ACDF achieved satisfactory and comparable clinical results. CDA was non-inferior to ACDF regarding the radiological outcomes of cervical alignment. Patients in CDA group had a relatively high incidence of HO formation.

摘要

目的

颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)是否及何时可用于术前颈椎后凸尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较术前可复性后凸患者单节段 CDA 和单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的临床和影像学结果。

患者和方法

2014 年至 2018 年,连续回顾了接受单节段 CDA 和单节段 ACDF 的患者。采用日本矫形协会评分、颈部残疾指数和视觉模拟评分评估临床结果。评估活动范围(ROM)、C2-7 Cobb 角、功能脊柱单位(FSU)角和异位骨化(HO)。

结果

38 例 CDA 患者(平均随访 39.8 个月)和 42 例 ACDF 患者(37.6 个月)术前存在可复性后凸。两组患者的临床结果均有显著改善,无统计学差异。术前颈椎排列和 ROM 两组间无显著差异。术后两组 C2-7 角和 FSU 均显著增加,组间无显著差异。末次随访时,CDA 组 5 例为前凸,11 例为后凸,22 例为直脊柱,而 ACDF 组相应的病例数为 4、12 和 26(P=0.866)。两组 C2-7 ROM 均保留。CDA 组的节段 ROM 轻度下降,从术前的 8.3°降至最终的 5.1°,而 ACDF 组的节段 ROM 显著下降至接近 0。CDA 组 60.5%(23/38)患者发生 HO,9 级 3 级,3 级 4 级。

结论

对于单节段椎间盘退行性疾病和术前可复性后凸的患者,CDA 和 ACDF 均取得了满意且可比的临床效果。CDA 在颈椎对线的影像学结果方面不劣于 ACDF。CDA 组患者 HO 形成的发生率相对较高。

相似文献

1
Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level disc degenerative disease with preoperative reversible kyphosis.颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗术前可复性后凸的单节段椎间盘退行性疾病。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106493. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106493. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up Results.双节段颈椎间盘退变疾病患者颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较:5年随访结果
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e1083-e1089. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.231. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
Clinical and radiological outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty in the patients with preoperative reversible kyphosis: A matched cohort study.术前可复性后凸患者行单节段颈椎间盘置换术的临床和影像学结果:一项配对队列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106247. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106247. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
5
Radiological and clinical outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty.3 节颈椎间盘置换的放射学和临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 1;32(2):174-181. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.SPINE19545. Print 2020 Feb 1.
6
Cervical disc arthroplasty for less-mobile discs.颈椎间盘置换术治疗活动度较差的椎间盘。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 May 10;31(3):310-316. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.SPINE181472. Print 2019 Sep 1.
7
Clinical and radiographic comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc and anterior cervical fusion: A minimum 6-year follow-up study.Prestige-LP椎间盘颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路融合术的临床及影像学比较:一项至少6年的随访研究
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;164:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
8
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
Can segmental mobility be increased by cervical arthroplasty?颈椎置换术能否增加节段活动度?
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E3. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.FOCUS16411.
10
Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty.器械限制的影响:ACDF 与颈椎间盘置换的比较网络荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1858-1871. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Focal Kyphotic Deformity at Non-responsible Levels Affect the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion?非责任节段的局部后凸畸形是否会影响前路颈椎减压融合术的疗效?
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun;16(6):1407-1417. doi: 10.1111/os.14048. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
[Influence of preoperative symptom duration on effectiveness of cervical disc arthroplasty in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients].[术前症状持续时间对神经根型颈椎病患者颈椎间盘置换术疗效的影响]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 15;38(2):176-182. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202310071.
3
Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):1047-1060. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346498.249. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
Are Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Medicare Reimbursement Trends Sustainable?颈椎间盘置换术的医疗保险报销趋势是否可持续?
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):222-229. doi: 10.14444/8428. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
5
Single-level cervical disc arthroplasty in the spine with reversible kyphosis: A finite element study.脊柱单节段颈椎间盘置换术与可逆性后凸:一项有限元研究。
JOR Spine. 2022 Feb 8;5(2):e1194. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1194. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
A Decreasing National Trend in Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty.腰椎间盘置换术的全国趋势呈下降态势。
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2271-2277. doi: 10.1177/21925682221079571. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Comparison of Radiographic Reconstruction and Clinical Improvement between Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.人工颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后影像学重建与临床改善的比较。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jan 24;2022:3353810. doi: 10.1155/2022/3353810. eCollection 2022.
8
A meta-analysis comparing the short- and mid- to long-term outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement(ACDR) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.一项荟萃分析比较了人工颈椎间盘置换术(ACDR)与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的短期、中期至长期疗效。
Int Orthop. 2022 Jul;46(7):1609-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05318-z. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
Commentary on "Impact of Nonlordotic Sagittal Alignment on Short-term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement".关于“非前凸矢状位排列对颈椎间盘置换短期疗效的影响”的评论
Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):413-414. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142442.221. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
Reply to Commentary on "Impact of Nonlordotic Sagittal Alignment on Short-term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement".对《非前凸矢状位排列对颈椎间盘置换短期疗效的影响》评论的回复
Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):415-416. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142446.223. Epub 2021 Jun 30.