• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎间盘置换:趋势、成本与并发症

Cervical Disc Replacement: Trends, Costs, and Complications.

作者信息

Jain Nickul Saral, Nguyen Ailene, Formanek Blake, Alluri Ram, Buser Zorica, Hah Ray, Wang Jeffrey Chun

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):647-654. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0246. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

DOI:10.31616/asj.2019.0246
PMID:32213792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7595820/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of insurance database.

PURPOSE

To investigate national trends, complications, and costs after cervical disc replacement (CDR) using an administrative insurance database representative of the United States population.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

As CDR continues to be used to treat patients with cervical stenosis, it is important to gain a better understanding of its use on a national level, potential complications, and cost. This information will allow for optimal patient counseling, risk stratification, and healthcare cost assessments. Several prior studies have investigated complications associated with CDR, but they have been limited by small sample size, single institution experiences, limited follow-up, and potential conflicts of interest.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single or multilevel CDR between 2007 and 2015 were identified using an insurance database. We collected data on annual trends, reimbursement costs, patient demographic information, hospital information, and information on complications from the time of operation to 1 year postoperative.

RESULTS

Total of 293 patients underwent either single or multilevel CDR. The number of procedures increased nonlinearly over time at an average of 17% per year, with a greater increase seen in the outpatient setting. Less than 3.7% of patients had new onset pain within 1 year after CDR. Within 1 year, 12.3% of patients reported a mechanical and/or bone-related complication. There were no patients who indicated a new nerve injury within 6 months of follow-up. Less than 3.7% of patients presented with dysphagia or dysphonia within 6 months, infection within 3 months, or a revision or reoperation within 1 year. Average reimbursement for single-level inpatient versus outpatient CDR was US $33,696.28 and US $34,675.12, respectively (p=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the use of CDR continued to increase. The most common complication was mechanical and/or bone-related, and cost analysis demonstrated no significant difference between inpatient and outpatient CDR.

摘要

研究设计

对保险数据库进行回顾性分析。

目的

利用一个代表美国人口的行政保险数据库,调查颈椎间盘置换术(CDR)后的全国趋势、并发症及费用情况。

文献综述

随着CDR持续用于治疗颈椎管狭窄患者,在国家层面更好地了解其应用情况、潜在并发症及费用非常重要。这些信息将有助于进行最佳的患者咨询、风险分层及医疗费用评估。此前有多项研究调查了与CDR相关的并发症,但这些研究存在样本量小、单机构经验、随访有限以及潜在利益冲突等局限性。

方法

利用保险数据库识别出2007年至2015年间接受单节段或多节段CDR的患者。我们收集了年度趋势、报销费用、患者人口统计学信息、医院信息以及从手术时到术后1年的并发症信息。

结果

共有293例患者接受了单节段或多节段CDR。手术例数随时间呈非线性增加,平均每年增加17%,门诊手术的增幅更大。CDR术后1年内,不到3.7%的患者出现新发疼痛。1年内,12.3%的患者报告出现机械性和/或与骨相关的并发症。随访6个月内,没有患者出现新的神经损伤。不到3.7%的患者在6个月内出现吞咽困难或发音障碍,3个月内出现感染,或1年内需要翻修或再次手术。单节段住院和门诊CDR的平均报销费用分别为33,696.28美元和34,675.12美元(p = 0.29)。

结论

本研究表明CDR的应用持续增加。最常见的并发症是机械性和/或与骨相关的并发症,费用分析显示住院和门诊CDR之间无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/306d/7595820/e2c710d8c56a/asj-2019-0246f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/306d/7595820/e2c710d8c56a/asj-2019-0246f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/306d/7595820/e2c710d8c56a/asj-2019-0246f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cervical Disc Replacement: Trends, Costs, and Complications.颈椎间盘置换:趋势、成本与并发症
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):647-654. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0246. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.2006 年至 2013 年期间美国颈椎间盘置换术和前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的资源利用和比率趋势。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.072. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.成本效益分析:比较单节段颈椎间盘置换术与单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):546-54. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12623. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
4
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术后的30天再入院率和再次手术率比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16407.
5
The 5-year cost-effectiveness of two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis.两种颈椎前路减压融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的 5 年成本效益分析:一项 Markov 分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.036. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.门诊颈椎间盘置换术与住院颈椎间盘置换术安全性的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2021 Sep;11(7):1121-1133. doi: 10.1177/2192568220959265. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
7
Retrospective single-surgeon study of 1123 consecutive cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of clinical outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between outpatient and inpatient surgery groups, with a literature review.对1123例连续的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术病例进行的单外科医生回顾性研究:门诊手术组与住院手术组临床结果参数、并发症发生率及费用的比较,并附文献综述
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jun;28(6):630-641. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17938. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
The 5-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的5年成本效益:一项马尔可夫分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Nov 1;39(23):1924-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000562.
9
Evaluation of Current Trends in Treatment of Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy.单节段神经根型颈椎病治疗的当前趋势评估
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;32(5):E241-E245. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000796.
10
Revision rates and complication incidence in single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures: an administrative database study.单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的翻修率及并发症发生率:一项行政数据库研究
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.474. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Historical trends and future projections of cervical disc arthroplasty and removal cervical disc arthroplasty in the United States Medicare population.美国医疗保险人群中颈椎间盘置换术和颈椎间盘切除术的历史趋势及未来预测。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jul 20;23:100774. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100774. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Postoperative Physical Therapy for Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Case Report.颈椎全椎间盘置换术后的物理治疗:一例报告
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):842-854. doi: 10.26603/001c.137694. eCollection 2025.
3
Readability of online patient education materials for cervical disc replacement.

本文引用的文献

1
Outpatient and Inpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Comparison of 30-day Outcomes.门诊和住院单节段颈椎全椎间盘置换:30 天结果比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 1;44(1):79-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002739.
2
Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.使用Mobi-C©颈椎间盘进行颈椎间盘置换术的长期评估:一项为期七年随访的随机、前瞻性、多中心临床试验
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Nov 28;11(4):31. doi: 10.14444/4031. eCollection 2017.
3
Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.
颈椎间盘置换术在线患者教育材料的可读性
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08942-6.
4
Trends in inpatient versus outpatient upper extremity fracture surgery from 2008 to 2021 and their implications for equitable access: a retrospective cohort study.2008 年至 2021 年上肢骨折手术住院与门诊治疗趋势及其对公平获得途径的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):4049-4056. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04106-2. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
5
Clinical management of bone loss in cervical total disc arthroplasty: literature review and treatment recommendations.颈椎间盘置换术后骨丢失的临床处理:文献回顾与治疗建议。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):2969-2981. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08407-2. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
6
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗双节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的最新系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3203. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113203.
7
Presentation and management of infection in total disc replacement: A review.全椎间盘置换术中感染的表现与处理:综述
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Mar 6;18:100320. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100320. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy as a Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: Complications and Pitfalls.椎体滑动截骨术作为治疗脊髓型颈椎病的手术策略:并发症与陷阱
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):669-677. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346320.160. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
9
Combining Laminoplasty With Artificial Disc Replacement for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy With Congenital Cervical Stenosis.椎板成形术联合人工椎间盘置换治疗先天性颈椎管狭窄症伴脊髓型颈椎病
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):492-501. doi: 10.14444/8475. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
[Mode establishment and preliminary clinical application of anterior cervical surgery in outpatient setting].[门诊环境下颈椎前路手术模式的建立及初步临床应用]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr 15;37(4):463-468. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202212063.
2006 年至 2013 年期间美国颈椎间盘置换术和前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的资源利用和比率趋势。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.072. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Reoperation Rates, Complications, and Hospital Resource Utilization in 72 688 Patients in the United States.颈椎全椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:美国 72688 例患者的再次手术率、并发症及医院资源利用情况。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Apr 1;82(4):441-453. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx289.
5
Cervical disc arthroplasty: do conflicts of interest influence the outcome of clinical studies?颈椎间盘置换术:利益冲突会影响临床研究结果吗?
Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):1026-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.Prestige LP椎间盘人工颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段病变:一项24个月的前瞻性、多中心随机对照临床试验结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):653-667. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
7
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术后的30天再入院率和再次手术率比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16407.
8
Minimum four-year subsequent surgery rates of cervical disc replacement versus fusion: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials.颈椎间盘置换与融合术后至少四年的再次手术率:前瞻性随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Comparison of the incidence of patient-reported post-operative dysphagia between ACDF with a traditional anterior plate and artificial cervical disc replacement.采用传统前路钢板的颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)与人工颈椎间盘置换术后患者报告的吞咽困难发生率比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;148:72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
10
Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后再次手术:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1307-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4707-5. Epub 2016 Feb 1.