Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 21;13(1):4637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31447-5.
People's natural tendencies to either approach or avoid different stimuli in their environment are considered fundamental motivators of human behaviour. There is a wealth of research exploring how changes in approach and avoidance motivational orientations impact behaviour with consequences for wellbeing. However, research has seldom explored this relationship in reverse. The COVID-19 pandemic offered a unique opportunity to explore whether widespread changes in social behaviour are associated with changes in automatic approach-avoidance tendencies over time. We gathered online survey data on people's adherence to 7 of the prescribed social restrictions set out by the UK government and people's automatic approach-avoidance tendencies in response to different stimuli (sad/happy faces and social scenes) at three time points during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reduced-overall-interaction (digital and in person) was found to be significantly associated with faster avoidance relative to approach of sad faces. The results suggest that automatic approach-avoidance tendencies may function to protect people against the typically negative experience of reduced social interaction, with important implications for understanding public resilience during times of crisis, and beyond.
人们在环境中对不同刺激物的趋近或回避的自然倾向被认为是人类行为的基本动机。有大量研究探索了趋近和回避动机取向的变化如何影响行为及其对幸福感的影响。然而,研究很少从相反的方向来探索这种关系。COVID-19 大流行提供了一个独特的机会来探索随着时间的推移,社会行为的广泛变化是否与自动趋近-回避倾向的变化有关。我们在 COVID-19 大流行期间的三个时间点收集了在线调查数据,这些数据涉及人们对英国政府规定的 7 项社会限制的遵守情况,以及人们对不同刺激物(悲伤/快乐面孔和社交场景)的自动趋近-回避倾向。结果发现,整体互动(数字和面对面)减少与悲伤面孔的回避相对趋近的速度更快显著相关。研究结果表明,自动趋近-回避倾向可能有助于保护人们免受社交互动减少的典型负面影响,这对理解危机时期和之后的公众韧性具有重要意义。