Suppr超能文献

降主动脉和胸腹主动脉修复术中脑脊液引流压力的影响:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。

Effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage pressure in descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repair: a prospective multicenter observational study.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibeshimmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2023 Jun;37(3):408-415. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03179-3. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is recommended during open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair. However, the incidence of CSFD complications is still high. Recently, CSF pressure has been kept high to avoid complications, but the efficacy of CSFD at higher pressures has not been confirmed. We hypothesize that CSFD at higher pressures is effective for preventing motor deficits.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 14 hospitals that are members of the Japanese Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Patients who underwent thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair were divided into four groups: Group 1, CSF pressure around 10 mmHg; Group 2, CSF pressure around 15 mmHg; Group 3, CSFD initiated when motor evoked potential amplitudes decreased; and Group 4, no CSFD. We assessed the association between the CSFD group and motor deficits using mixed-effects logistic regression with a random intercept for the institution.

RESULTS

Of 1072 patients in the study, 84 patients (open surgery, 51; thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 33) had motor deficits at discharge. Groups 1 and 2 were not associated with motor deficits (Group 1, odds ratio (OR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-3.29, p = 0.276; Group 2, OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.62-4.82) when compared with Group 4. Group 3 was significantly more prone to motor deficits than Group 4 (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.27-5.17, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

CSFD is not associated with motor deficits in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair with CSF pressure around 10 or 15 mmHg.

摘要

目的

在开放或血管内胸主动脉修复期间,建议进行脑脊液引流(CSFD)。然而,CSFD 并发症的发生率仍然很高。最近,为了避免并发症,保持脑脊液压力较高,但较高压力下 CSFD 的疗效尚未得到证实。我们假设较高压力下的 CSFD 对预防运动功能障碍有效。

方法

本前瞻性观察研究纳入了日本心血管麻醉学会的 14 家成员医院。接受胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉修复的患者被分为四组:组 1,脑脊液压力约为 10mmHg;组 2,脑脊液压力约为 15mmHg;组 3,当运动诱发电位幅度下降时开始 CSF 引流;组 4,不进行 CSF 引流。我们使用具有机构随机截距的混合效应逻辑回归评估 CSFD 组与运动障碍之间的关系。

结果

在这项研究的 1072 例患者中,有 84 例(开放手术 51 例;胸主动脉腔内修复术 33 例)出院时存在运动障碍。与组 4 相比,组 1(比值比(OR):1.53,95%置信区间(95%CI):0.71-3.29,p=0.276)和组 2(OR:1.73,95%CI:0.62-4.82)与运动障碍无关。与组 4 相比,组 3 发生运动障碍的风险显著更高(OR:2.56,95%CI:1.27-5.17,p=0.009)。

结论

在胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉修复中,CSFD 与 CSF 压力在 10 或 15mmHg 左右时与运动障碍无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验