Department of Transfusion, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibeshimmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
J Anesth. 2023 Jun;37(3):408-415. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03179-3. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is recommended during open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair. However, the incidence of CSFD complications is still high. Recently, CSF pressure has been kept high to avoid complications, but the efficacy of CSFD at higher pressures has not been confirmed. We hypothesize that CSFD at higher pressures is effective for preventing motor deficits.
This prospective observational study included 14 hospitals that are members of the Japanese Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Patients who underwent thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair were divided into four groups: Group 1, CSF pressure around 10 mmHg; Group 2, CSF pressure around 15 mmHg; Group 3, CSFD initiated when motor evoked potential amplitudes decreased; and Group 4, no CSFD. We assessed the association between the CSFD group and motor deficits using mixed-effects logistic regression with a random intercept for the institution.
Of 1072 patients in the study, 84 patients (open surgery, 51; thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 33) had motor deficits at discharge. Groups 1 and 2 were not associated with motor deficits (Group 1, odds ratio (OR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-3.29, p = 0.276; Group 2, OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.62-4.82) when compared with Group 4. Group 3 was significantly more prone to motor deficits than Group 4 (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.27-5.17, p = 0.009).
CSFD is not associated with motor deficits in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair with CSF pressure around 10 or 15 mmHg.
在开放或血管内胸主动脉修复期间,建议进行脑脊液引流(CSFD)。然而,CSFD 并发症的发生率仍然很高。最近,为了避免并发症,保持脑脊液压力较高,但较高压力下 CSFD 的疗效尚未得到证实。我们假设较高压力下的 CSFD 对预防运动功能障碍有效。
本前瞻性观察研究纳入了日本心血管麻醉学会的 14 家成员医院。接受胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉修复的患者被分为四组:组 1,脑脊液压力约为 10mmHg;组 2,脑脊液压力约为 15mmHg;组 3,当运动诱发电位幅度下降时开始 CSF 引流;组 4,不进行 CSF 引流。我们使用具有机构随机截距的混合效应逻辑回归评估 CSFD 组与运动障碍之间的关系。
在这项研究的 1072 例患者中,有 84 例(开放手术 51 例;胸主动脉腔内修复术 33 例)出院时存在运动障碍。与组 4 相比,组 1(比值比(OR):1.53,95%置信区间(95%CI):0.71-3.29,p=0.276)和组 2(OR:1.73,95%CI:0.62-4.82)与运动障碍无关。与组 4 相比,组 3 发生运动障碍的风险显著更高(OR:2.56,95%CI:1.27-5.17,p=0.009)。
在胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉修复中,CSFD 与 CSF 压力在 10 或 15mmHg 左右时与运动障碍无关。