Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 患者呼吸康复治疗的效果:一项荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Prima Nusantara Bukittinggi University, Bukittinggi, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4972-4987. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16692. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

AIM

Examine effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation and moderating factors on lung function and exercise capacity in post-COVID-19 patients.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

R software 4.0.2 assessed the effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation adopting the random-effects model and presenting standardised mean differences (SMDs). Heterogeneity was determined by Cochran's Q and I . The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and MINORS evaluated quality of the included studies.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was undertaken in Cochrane, Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, Scopus, NCBI SARS-CoV-2 Resources, ProQuest, Web of Science and CINAHL until March 2022.

RESULTS

Of the 5703 identified studies, 12 articles with 596 post-COVID-19 patients were included. Eleven of our twelve studies had moderate to high quality and one study had high risk of bias assessed with MINORS and RoB 2 tool. Overall, respiratory rehabilitation was effective in improving forced expiratory volume in 1 s (1.14; 95%CI 0.39-1.18), forced vital capacity (0.98; 95%CI 0.39-1.56), total lung capacity (0.83; 95%CI 0.22-1.44), 6-minute walk distance (1.56; 95%CI 1.10-2.02) and quality of life (0.99; 95%CI 0.38-1.60). However, no significant differences were observed for ratio of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s to the forced vital capacity of the lungs, anxiety and depression. Respiratory rehabilitation for post-COVID-19 patients was effective in those without comorbidities, performed four types of exercise programs, frequency ≥3 times/week and rehabilitation time 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory rehabilitation improved lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life in post-COVID-19 patients. The findings suggest rehabilitation programs for post-COVID-19 patients should use multiple respiratory exercise programs with frequency of ≥3 times per week for longer than 6 weeks.

IMPACT

These findings will help improve the implementation of respiratory rehabilitation programs for post-COVID-19 patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

Our findings can be used to develop patient-centred respiratory rehabilitation interventions by nurses and clinicians for post-COVID-19 patients.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA guideline was followed.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

目的

研究呼吸康复对新冠后患者肺功能和运动能力的有效性及其调节因素。

设计

荟萃分析。

方法

采用随机效应模型评估呼吸康复的效果,使用标准化均数差(SMD)表示。采用 Cochran's Q 和 I 检验评估异质性。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2.0 版和 MINORS 评估纳入研究的质量。

数据来源

对 Cochrane、Embase、Ovid-MEDLINE、Scopus、NCBI SARS-CoV-2 资源、ProQuest、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 进行全面检索,检索时间截至 2022 年 3 月。

结果

从 5703 项已识别的研究中,纳入了 12 项研究,共 596 名新冠后患者。我们的 12 项研究中有 11 项为中高质量,1 项为高风险偏倚,使用 MINORS 和 RoB 2 工具评估。总的来说,呼吸康复对以下指标有效:用力呼气量 1 秒(1.14;95%CI 0.39-1.18)、用力肺活量(0.98;95%CI 0.39-1.56)、总肺活量(0.83;95%CI 0.22-1.44)、6 分钟步行距离(1.56;95%CI 1.10-2.02)和生活质量(0.99;95%CI 0.38-1.60)。然而,在用力肺活量与用力呼气量之比、焦虑和抑郁方面,没有观察到显著差异。对于无合并症的患者,采用 4 种类型的运动方案,每周进行 3 次以上,康复时间为 6 周以上,呼吸康复对新冠后患者是有效的。

结论

呼吸康复可改善新冠后患者的肺功能、运动能力和生活质量。这些发现表明,新冠后患者的康复计划应采用多种呼吸运动方案,每周进行 3 次以上,持续时间超过 6 周。

影响

这些发现将有助于改善新冠后患者的呼吸康复计划的实施。

对专业人员的影响

我们的发现可以为护士和临床医生为新冠后患者制定以患者为中心的呼吸康复干预措施提供依据。

报告方法

遵循 PRISMA 指南。

患者或公众贡献

无患者或公众贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验