Calvache-Mateo Andrés, Heredia-Ciuró Alejandro, Martín-Núñez Javier, Hernández-Hernández Sofía, Reychler Gregory, López-López Laura, Valenza Marie Carmen
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Av. De la Ilustración, 60, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;11(18):2519. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182519.
The aim of this review was to identify, map, and synthesize the extent and nature of research activity on the use of telerehabilitation to support Long COVID-19 rehabilitation and examine the efficacy and safety of respiratory telerehabilitation in patients with Long COVID-19. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed. We included controlled trials that tested the effect of respiratory telerehabilitation interventions in patients with Long COVID-19 versus no intervention, usual care, placebo, or face-to-face intervention. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for quality of life, dyspnea, lung function, anxiety and depression, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and lower limb strength. Finally, 10 studies were included. The meta-analysis results show significant differences in favor of respiratory telerehabilitation in quality of life ( = 0.02), dyspnea ( < 0.00001), respiratory muscle strength ( < 0.001), functional capacity ( < 0.0001), and lower limb strength ( = 0.01) but not in lung function ( = 0.28) and anxiety and depression ( = 0.55). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse effects ( = 0.06) between the telerehabilitation and comparator groups. The results suggest that these interventions can improve quality of life, reduce dyspnea, and increase respiratory and lower extremity muscle strength as well as functional capacity in patients with Long COVID-19.
本综述的目的是识别、梳理并综合利用远程康复支持新冠后综合征康复的研究活动的范围和性质,并检验远程呼吸康复对新冠后综合征患者的疗效和安全性。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。我们纳入了测试远程呼吸康复干预措施对新冠后综合征患者的效果,并与无干预、常规护理、安慰剂或面对面干预进行对比的对照试验。对数据进行汇总,并针对生活质量、呼吸困难、肺功能、焦虑和抑郁、呼吸肌力量、功能能力以及下肢力量完成了荟萃分析。最终,共纳入10项研究。荟萃分析结果显示,在生活质量(P = 0.02)、呼吸困难(P < 0.00001)、呼吸肌力量(P < 0.001)、功能能力(P < 0.0001)和下肢力量(P = 0.01)方面,远程呼吸康复具有显著优势,但在肺功能(P = 0.28)以及焦虑和抑郁(P = 0.55)方面没有显著差异。此外,远程康复组与对照组在不良反应方面(P = 0.06)没有统计学上的显著差异。结果表明,这些干预措施可以改善新冠后综合征患者的生活质量,减轻呼吸困难,并增强呼吸和下肢肌肉力量以及功能能力。