Suppr超能文献

系统评价研究检索中应避免的错误:护士研究人员指南。

Errors to avoid when searching for studies for systematic reviews: A guide for nurse researchers.

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 May;18(3):e12533. doi: 10.1111/opn.12533. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

Systematic reviews aim to provide reliable answers to research questions by identifying and synthesising the available evidence using rigorous methods. This makes systematic reviews a cornerstone of evidence-based practice in healthcare settings. However, despite the avowed aim and importance of systematic reviews, studies have shown that they often include serious flaws, including in the search for studies. In this article, some commonly seen errors in systematic review search strategies are described with the intention of alerting nurse researchers who are planning a systematic review to what should be avoided. These include errors relating to bibliographic databases and supplementary searches, including database selection, free-text searching, controlled vocabulary and structural errors. The paper is framed within the context of older people nursing but has relevance to nurse researchers more widely.

摘要

系统评价旨在通过使用严格的方法识别和综合现有证据,为研究问题提供可靠的答案。这使得系统评价成为医疗保健环境中循证实践的基石。然而,尽管系统评价的目的和重要性不言而喻,但研究表明,它们经常存在严重的缺陷,包括研究的检索。本文描述了系统评价检索策略中一些常见的错误,旨在提醒计划进行系统评价的护士研究人员应避免哪些错误。这些错误包括与文献数据库和补充检索相关的错误,包括数据库选择、自由文本检索、受控词汇和结构错误。本文的框架是老年人护理,但与更广泛的护士研究人员有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验