第 4 章：医学检验系统评价的有效检索策略。
Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
机构信息
Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97217, USA.
出版信息
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1873-8.
Abstract
This article discusses techniques that are appropriate when developing search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests. This includes general advice for searching for systematic reviews and issues specific to systematic reviews of medical tests. Diagnostic search filters are currently not sufficiently developed for use when searching for systematic reviews. Instead, authors should construct a highly sensitive search strategy that uses both controlled vocabulary and text words. A comprehensive search should include multiple databases and sources of grey literature. A list of subject-specific databases is included in this article.
摘要
本文讨论了在为医学测试的系统评价开发检索策略时适用的技术。这包括用于搜索系统评价的一般建议以及专门针对医学测试的系统评价的问题。目前，诊断搜索过滤器还不够完善，无法在搜索系统评价时使用。相反，作者应该构建一个使用受控词汇和文本词的高度敏感的搜索策略。全面的搜索应包括多个数据库和灰色文献来源。本文包括一份主题特定数据库的列表。
相似文献
1
Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1873-8.
3
[Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
Rev Med Chil. 2009 Feb;137(2):303-7. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
4
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
5
[Profile of a systematic search. Search areas, databases and reports].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Apr 3;168(14):1431-4.
6
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6.
7
Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2003 Jul 7;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-3-3.
8
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
9
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.014.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
引用本文的文献
1
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 7 - synthesizing evidence.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):958-969. doi: 10.1007/s12055-025-01940-9. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Dec 21;8:1268045. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1268045. eCollection 2023.
3
Progress in data interoperability to support computational toxicology and chemical safety evaluation.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 1;380:114707. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114707. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;64(6):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
3
Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review.
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):e139; author reply e140. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.524876. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
5
Developing a sensitive search strategy in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on assessment of the diagnostic performance of imaging techniques.
Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):365-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070101. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
6
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
7
Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately?
Health Info Libr J. 2007 Sep;24(3):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00735.x.
8
Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and standard terminology regarding performance of diagnostic tests.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):221-3.
9
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.014.
10
Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 May;58(5):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.011.
Zotero 插件