第 4 章：医学检验系统评价的有效检索策略。
Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
机构信息
Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97217, USA.
出版信息
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1873-8.
Abstract
This article discusses techniques that are appropriate when developing search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests. This includes general advice for searching for systematic reviews and issues specific to systematic reviews of medical tests. Diagnostic search filters are currently not sufficiently developed for use when searching for systematic reviews. Instead, authors should construct a highly sensitive search strategy that uses both controlled vocabulary and text words. A comprehensive search should include multiple databases and sources of grey literature. A list of subject-specific databases is included in this article.
摘要
本文讨论了在为医学测试的系统评价开发检索策略时适用的技术。这包括用于搜索系统评价的一般建议以及专门针对医学测试的系统评价的问题。目前，诊断搜索过滤器还不够完善，无法在搜索系统评价时使用。相反，作者应该构建一个使用受控词汇和文本词的高度敏感的搜索策略。全面的搜索应包括多个数据库和灰色文献来源。本文包括一份主题特定数据库的列表。
相似文献
1
Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.第 4 章：医学检验系统评价的有效检索策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1873-8.
3
[Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].[诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价]
Rev Med Chil. 2009 Feb;137(2):303-7. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
4
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.关于检测准确性的系统评价应检索一系列数据库以识别原始研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
5
[Profile of a systematic search. Search areas, databases and reports].[系统检索概况。检索领域、数据库及报告]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Apr 3;168(14):1431-4.
6
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?优化系统评价中的文献检索——MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL足以识别肌肉骨骼疾病领域的效应研究吗？
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6.
7
Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators.在生物医学数据库中检索补充医学相关内容：作者、索引编制人员和研究人员对受控词汇的使用情况。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2003 Jul 7;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-3-3.
8
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
9
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.使用方法学检索过滤器来识别诊断准确性研究可能会导致遗漏相关研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.014.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
引用本文的文献
1
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 7 - synthesizing evidence.心胸外科医生的系统评价与Meta分析：第7部分 - 证据综合
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):958-969. doi: 10.1007/s12055-025-01940-9. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability.评估系统评价：确保有效性和可靠性的综合指南。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Dec 21;8:1268045. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1268045. eCollection 2023.
3
Progress in data interoperability to support computational toxicology and chemical safety evaluation.数据互操作性的进展，以支持计算毒理学和化学品安全评价。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 1;380:114707. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114707. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.寻找医学干预措施比较的证据：AHRQ 和有效医疗保健计划。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies.在检索诊断准确性研究的搜索中包含方法学过滤器会遗漏相关研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;64(6):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
3
Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.诊断性试验的系统评价：用于诊断准确性研究的文献检索过滤器（“临床问题”）效果良好。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review.对于系统评价而言，搜索除PubMed之外的其他数据库是必要的。
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):e139; author reply e140. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.524876. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
5
Developing a sensitive search strategy in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on assessment of the diagnostic performance of imaging techniques.制定MEDLINE中的敏感检索策略，以检索关于影像技术诊断性能评估的研究。
Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):365-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070101. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
6
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.关于检测准确性的系统评价应检索一系列数据库以识别原始研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
7
Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately?已发表的用于识别诊断试验准确性研究的检索过滤器效果如何？
Health Info Libr J. 2007 Sep;24(3):188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00735.x.
8
Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and standard terminology regarding performance of diagnostic tests.医学主题词与诊断试验性能标准术语的比较。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):221-3.
9
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.使用方法学检索过滤器来识别诊断准确性研究可能会导致遗漏相关研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.014.
10
Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.由于方法学筛选标准的敏感性和精确性较差以及摘要中缺乏相关信息，因此很难确定用于诊断试验系统评价的研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 May;58(5):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.011.
Zotero 插件