Suppr超能文献

仪式化的世界关系:儒家对罗莎关于共鸣局限性的批判。

Ritualized world relations: a Confucian critique of Rosa's limitations on resonance.

作者信息

Sigurðsson Geir, D'Ambrosio Paul J

机构信息

Chinese Studies and Philosophy, Head of Programme, Chinese Studies, School of Humanities, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Center for Intercultural Research, Fellow of the Institute of Modern Chinese Thought, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200241 Minhang China.

出版信息

J Chin Sociol. 2023;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40711-023-00184-7. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

Hartmut Rosa argues that our modern and post-modern societies can be understood through the notion of dynamic stabilization-institutions require growth to maintain themselves. Part of the impetus behind the acceleration that drives dynamic stabilization is the desire to make the world more available, attainable, and accessible. On both the institutional and individual levels, this is translated into making the world more within our reach, more engineerable, predictable, and controllable. Paradoxically, success in these areas is often accompanied by the world becoming increasingly silent, cold, and unresponsive. We feel alienated or that our world relation has failed. Rosa's solution is to reestablish resonance with the world. In this paper, we argue that his notion of resonance depends on a degree of atomic agency that muffles its own efficacy. The Confucian notion of ritual offers a more dispersed notion of agency. Rather than seeing oneself, others, and the world as distinct agents or indivisible entities, a ritualized approach sees them as mutually constitutive. It is true even on the level of agency, which drastically changes our relationship with the world.

摘要

哈特穆特·罗萨认为,我们的现代社会和后现代社会可以通过动态稳定的概念来理解——制度需要增长来维持自身。推动动态稳定的加速背后的部分动力是使世界变得更易获取、更可实现和更易接近的愿望。在制度层面和个人层面,这都转化为使世界更在我们的掌控之中,更具可设计性、可预测性和可控性。矛盾的是,这些领域的成功往往伴随着世界变得越来越沉默、冷漠和无回应。我们感到疏离,或者觉得我们与世界的关系失败了。罗萨的解决方案是重新建立与世界的共鸣。在本文中,我们认为他的共鸣概念依赖于一种原子式的能动性,这种能动性削弱了其自身的效力。儒家的礼的概念提供了一种更为分散的能动性概念。礼的方式不是将自己、他人和世界看作是不同的能动者或不可分割的实体,而是将它们视为相互构成的。甚至在能动性层面也是如此,这极大地改变了我们与世界的关系。

相似文献

3
Tuning into Harmut Rosa's systematic romanticism.深入了解哈穆特·罗萨的系统浪漫主义。
J Chin Sociol. 2023;10(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40711-023-00189-2. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
A Confucian reflection on genetic enhancement.儒家对基因增强的思考。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):62-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161003637541.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验