• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儒家对基因增强的思考。

A Confucian reflection on genetic enhancement.

机构信息

City University of Hong Kong, Department of Public & Social Administration, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):62-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161003637541.

DOI:10.1080/15265161003637541
PMID:20379929
Abstract

This essay explores a proper Confucian vision on genetic enhancement. It argues that while Confucians can accept a formal starting point that Michael Sandel proposes in his ethics of giftedness, namely, that children should be taken as gifts, Confucians cannot adopt his generalist strategy. The essay provides a Confucian full ethics of giftedness by addressing a series of relevant questions, such as what kind of gifts children are, where the gifts are from, in which way they are given, and for what purpose they are given. It indicates that Confucians should sort out different types of enhancement and bring them to the test of the Confucian values in terms of both Confucian virtue principles and specific ritual rules. It concludes that Confucians can accept some types of enhancement but must reject others.

摘要

本文探讨了儒家对基因增强的恰当看法。它认为,虽然儒家可以接受迈克尔·桑德尔(Michael Sandel)在其天赋伦理中提出的正式起点,即孩子应该被视为礼物,但儒家不能采用他的通才策略。本文通过回答一系列相关问题,提供了一种儒家式的天赋伦理,例如孩子是什么样的礼物,礼物来自何处,以何种方式给予,以及给予的目的是什么。它表明,儒家应该梳理不同类型的增强,并根据儒家美德原则和具体礼仪规则,将它们置于儒家价值观的检验之下。本文得出的结论是,儒家可以接受某些类型的增强,但必须拒绝其他类型的增强。

相似文献

1
A Confucian reflection on genetic enhancement.儒家对基因增强的思考。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):62-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161003637541.
2
Genetic enhancement revisited: response to open peer commentaries.再谈基因增强:对公开同行评论的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):W6-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161003697594.
3
Confucianism's challenge to Western bioethics.儒家思想对西方生物伦理学的挑战。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):73-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161003633078.
4
Reflecting on the nature of Confucian ethics.反思儒家伦理的本质。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):84-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161003686498.
5
Cosmetic genetics and virtue-based restraints on autonomy.美容遗传学与基于美德的自主性限制。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):71-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161003652250.
6
What would some Confucians think about genetic enhancement from the perspective of "human nature"?一些儒家学者会从“人性”的角度如何看待基因增强?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):80-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161003650510.
7
Concerns beyond the family.家庭之外的担忧。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):82-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161003697255.
8
Relativistic perspectives of genetic enhancement: a challenge to future progress.基因增强的相对论观点:对未来进步的挑战。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(4):74-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161003633011.
9
Medicine--the art of humaneness: on ethics of traditional Chinese medicine.医学——仁术:论中医伦理学
J Med Philos. 1988 Aug;13(3):277-99.
10
Engineers' Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.工程师的道德责任:儒家视角。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):233-253. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00093-4. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Would the Person Be after a Head Transplant? A Confucian Reflection.头移植后会变成谁?一个儒家的反思。
J Med Philos. 2022 May 11;47(2):210-229. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhab024.
2
Family-Based Consent and Motivation for Cadaveric Organ Donation in China: An Ethical Exploration1.中国尸体器官捐献中的家庭同意与动机:伦理探索1
J Med Philos. 2019 Sep 17;44(5):534-553. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhz022.
3
Birth with dignity from the Confucian perspective.儒家视角下的尊严分娩。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 Oct;39(5):375-388. doi: 10.1007/s11017-018-9460-1.