Department of Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Oct;31(5):892-900. doi: 10.1177/15266028221149920. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization has been used in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with inadequate proximal landing zone (PLZ). The outcomes of comparisons between TEVAR and hybrid procedure on patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ, are rarely reported. This study sought to compare and clarify the early and midterm outcomes between TEVAR and hybrid procedure in patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ.
Between January 2019 and December 2021, 93 patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ, who underwent TEVAR or hybrid procedure, were retrospectively evaluated in Beijing Anzhen hospital. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative imaging features, periprocedural details, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier method.
TEVAR procedures were performed on 41 patients (TEVAR group) and hybrid procedures on 52 patients (hybrid group). Early events, 30 day mortality, and all-cause mortality, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, patients receiving TEVAR had significantly shorter procedure time (p<0.001), hospital stay (p<0.001), and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p=0.001) compared with those in the hybrid group. Patients receiving TEVAR had significantly lower midterm events (p=0.014) and re-intervention (p=0.015) compared with those in the hybrid group.
The study indicated that TEVAR with LSA revascularization for TBAD with inadequate PLZ is associated with a trend toward lower rates of midterm events, while the early and midterm mortalities were comparable with those in hybrid procedure.
This study is novel as it compared the outcomes between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and hybrid procedure in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with inadequate proximal landing zone, which has been rarely reported previously. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it is clinically relevant as it demonstrated that TEVAR with left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization for TBAD with inadequate proximal landing zone is associated with a trend toward lower rates of mid-term events, while the early and mid-term mortalities were comparable with those in the hybrid procedure.
对于近端锚定区不足的 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者,已采用经胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)联合左锁骨下动脉(LSA)重建。然而,比较 TEVAR 和杂交手术治疗近端锚定区不足的 TBAD 患者的早期和中期结果的研究很少。本研究旨在比较和阐明近端锚定区不足的 TBAD 患者行 TEVAR 和杂交手术的早期和中期结果。
回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院行 TEVAR 或杂交手术治疗近端锚定区不足的 TBAD 患者 93 例。分析患者的一般资料、合并症、术前影像学特征、围手术期细节和随访结果。生存情况采用 Kaplan-Meier 法分析。
41 例行 TEVAR 治疗(TEVAR 组),52 例行杂交手术治疗(杂交组)。两组间早期事件、30 天死亡率和全因死亡率无显著差异。然而,TEVAR 组患者的手术时间(p<0.001)、住院时间(p<0.001)和重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间(p=0.001)显著短于杂交组。TEVAR 组患者的中期事件(p=0.014)和再次干预(p=0.015)发生率显著低于杂交组。
对于近端锚定区不足的 TBAD 患者,TEVAR 联合 LSA 重建术的中期事件发生率较低,而早期和中期死亡率与杂交手术相当。
本研究比较了近端锚定区不足的 TBAD 患者行 TEVAR 和杂交手术的结果,此前很少有研究报道过此类内容。我们认为,本研究对文献有重要贡献,因为它具有临床意义,结果表明对于近端锚定区不足的 TBAD 患者,TEVAR 联合 LSA 重建术的中期事件发生率较低,而早期和中期死亡率与杂交手术相当。