Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Marquette University College of Nursing, 530 N. 16th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53233, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2023 May;79(5):1898-1911. doi: 10.1111/jan.15651. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
The aim of the study was to examine how female sex worker's motivations, desires, intentions and behaviours towards childbearing and childbearing avoidance inform their contraceptive decision-making. We explored the influence of social determinants of health in the domains of social context (sexual partners and experiences of violence), healthcare access, economic instability on the contraceptive decision-making process.
We conducted a qualitative descriptive study informed by Miller's Theory of Childbearing Motivations, Desires and Intentions through the lens of social determinants of health.
Participants were recruited from a parent study, EMERALD, in July-September, 2020. Data were collected from 22 female sex workers ages 18-49 using semi-structured 45 to 60-min audio-recorded interviews and transcribed verbatim. Theory guided the development of the study's interview guide and thematic analytic strategy.
Five themes emerged related to contraceptive decision-making: Motivations (value of fatherhood), Desires (relationships with love), Intentions and Behaviours (drugs overpower everything, contraceptive strategies and having children means being a protector). Women's contraceptive decision-making often included intentions to use contraception. However, social determinants such relationships with clients and intimate partners, interpersonal violence and challenges accessing traditional health care offering contraceptive services often interfered with these intentions and influenced contraceptive behaviours.
Women's contraceptive decision-making process included well-informed desires related to childbearing and contraceptive use. However, social determinants across domains of health interfered with autonomous contraceptive decision-making. More effort is needed to examine the influence of social determinants on the reproductive health of this population.
Findings from this study build on existing research that examines social determinants impacting reproductive health among female sex workers. Existing theoretical frameworks may not fully capture the influence constrained reproductive autonomy has on contraceptive decision-making. Future studies examining interpersonal and structural barriers to contraception are warranted.
The parent study, EMERALD, collaborated with community service providers in the study intervention.
本研究旨在探讨女性性工作者的生育意愿、愿望、意图和行为如何影响其避孕决策。我们探讨了健康的社会决定因素在社会背景(性伴侣和暴力经历)、医疗保健获取、经济不稳定等领域对避孕决策过程的影响。
本研究基于 Miller 的生育动机、愿望和意图理论,并通过健康的社会决定因素视角进行了定性描述研究。
我们于 2020 年 7 月至 9 月从 EMERALD 母研究中招募了参与者。通过半结构式的 45 至 60 分钟的音频记录访谈收集了 22 名年龄在 18 至 49 岁的女性性工作者的数据,并逐字转录。理论指导了研究访谈指南和主题分析策略的制定。
研究结果出现了五个与避孕决策相关的主题:动机(父权的价值)、愿望(与爱的关系)、意图和行为(毒品主宰一切、避孕策略和生育意味着成为保护者)。女性的避孕决策通常包括使用避孕措施的意愿。然而,社会决定因素,如与客户和亲密伴侣的关系、人际暴力以及获得传统医疗保健提供避孕服务的挑战,经常干扰这些意图并影响避孕行为。
女性的避孕决策过程包括与生育和避孕使用相关的知情愿望。然而,健康的各个领域的社会决定因素干扰了自主避孕决策。需要进一步努力研究社会决定因素对这一人群生殖健康的影响。
本研究的结果建立在现有的研究基础上,这些研究考察了影响女性性工作者生殖健康的社会决定因素。现有的理论框架可能无法完全捕捉到受限的生殖自主权对避孕决策的影响。未来研究需要考察避孕的人际和结构性障碍。
EMERALD 母研究与研究干预中的社区服务提供者合作。