• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国放射学会提出的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在手术切除的甲状腺结节中的诊断效率。

Evaluating Diagnostic Efficiency of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems proposed by the American College of Radiology in Surgically Resected Thyroid Nodules.

作者信息

Ahmadinejad Izadmehr, Mardasi Kimia Ghanbari, Ahmadinejad Yasmina, Kahrizi Mohammad Saeed, Soltanian Ali, Merdasi Pooriya Ghanbari, Ahmadinejad Mojtaba

机构信息

Medical Student, Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Student of Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

出版信息

Curr Med Imaging. 2023 Mar 22. doi: 10.2174/1573405619666230322095526.

DOI:10.2174/1573405619666230322095526
PMID:36946476
Abstract

AIM

Thyroid nodules are one of the most common clinical findings, with a prevalence of 68% in adults. Thyroid cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems proposed by the American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS) for the diagnosis of malignancy in surgically resected thyroid nodules.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients who underwent thyroid nodules resected surgically from 2018-2020 were included. Before resection, an ultrasound was performed for TIRADS scores, and after resection histopathology, thyroid mass was obtained. The outcomes of the two systems were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 146 included patients was 47.6 ± 14.08 years, of which 109 (74.7%) were female. Based on TIRADS, 47 patients (32.2%) were in TI-RADS TR3, 36 patients (24.7%) were in TIRADS TR2, 34 (23.3%) in TIRADS 4, 24 (16.4%) in TIRADS TR5 and 5 patients (3.4%) were in TIRADS TR1. The overall sensitivity was 79.9% when ACR-TIRADS TR4 was set as a diagnostic cutoff value. Considering the total of TIRADS TR4 and TIRADS TR5 as predictors of thyroid malignancy, the sensitivity was 74.5% and the specificity was 76.8%. The positive and negative predictive value was 60.3% and 76.8%.

CONCLUSION

ACR-TIRADS 4 and 5 can be considered good predictors of malignancy in thyroid nodules. More studies, including larger samples, are required to obtain a better conclusion.

摘要

目的

甲状腺结节是最常见的临床发现之一,在成年人中的患病率为68%。甲状腺癌是女性中第五大常见癌症。

引言

本研究的目的是评估美国放射学会提出的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR-TIRADS)对手术切除的甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤诊断的有效性。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2018年至2020年接受甲状腺结节手术切除的患者。在切除前,进行超声检查以获得TIRADS评分,切除后进行组织病理学检查以获取甲状腺肿块。对这两种系统的结果进行统计学比较。

结果

纳入的146例患者的平均年龄为47.6±14.08岁,其中109例(74.7%)为女性。根据TIRADS,47例患者(32.2%)为TI-RADS TR3,36例患者(24.7%)为TIRADS TR2,34例(23.3%)为TIRADS 4,24例(16.4%)为TIRADS TR5,5例患者(3.4%)为TIRADS TR1。当将ACR-TIRADS TR4设定为诊断临界值时,总体敏感性为79.9%。将TIRADS TR4和TIRADS TR5的总和视为甲状腺恶性肿瘤的预测指标时,敏感性为74.5%,特异性为76.8%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为60.3%和76.8%。

结论

ACR-TIRADS 4和5可被视为甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤的良好预测指标。需要更多研究,包括更大样本量的研究,以得出更好的结论。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Diagnostic Efficiency of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems proposed by the American College of Radiology in Surgically Resected Thyroid Nodules.评估美国放射学会提出的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在手术切除的甲状腺结节中的诊断效率。
Curr Med Imaging. 2023 Mar 22. doi: 10.2174/1573405619666230322095526.
2
Correlation of TIRADS scoring in thyroid nodules with preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy and postoperative specimen pathology.甲状腺结节 TIRADS 评分与术前细针穿刺活检及术后标本病理的相关性。
Head Neck. 2024 Apr;46(4):849-856. doi: 10.1002/hed.27622. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.比较 TIRADS(ACR TI-RADS 和 KWAK-TI-RADS)与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节诊断效率中的应用。
Endocrine. 2019 Apr;64(1):90-96. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01843-x. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)评分较高是否预示恶性风险增加?评估甲状腺结节时 ACR TI-RADS 与细针穿刺细胞学的相关性研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jul;128(7):470-481. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22254. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Comparison of Diagnostic Values of ACR TI-RADS versus C-TIRADS Scoring and Classification Systems for the Elderly Thyroid Cancers.美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)与中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(C-TIRADS)评分及分类系统对老年甲状腺癌诊断价值的比较
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Sep 29;16:4441-4451. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S429681. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of artificial intelligence, elastic imaging, and the thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the differential diagnosis of suspicious nodules.人工智能、弹性成像及甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在可疑结节鉴别诊断中的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):711-721. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-788. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
7
A DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE ATA AND TI-RADS ULTRASOUND SCORING SYSTEMS.ATA 和 TI-RADS 超声评分系统的直接比较。
Endocr Pract. 2019 May;25(5):413-422. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0369. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.多机构甲状腺超声数据库中甲状腺风险分类系统与细针抽吸建议的比较。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Dec;18(12):1605-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.超声弹性成像技术在甲状腺结节诊断中的应用价值:一项系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 31;14:1227339. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1227339. eCollection 2023.
10
The impact of the use of the ACR-TIRADS as a screening tool for thyroid nodules in a cancer center.ACR-TIRADS 在癌症中心作为甲状腺结节筛查工具的应用影响。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Jan;50(1):18-23. doi: 10.1002/dc.24904. Epub 2021 Nov 19.